Snapshot of zapier-decisions (optimal NATS config study)

reports/ns1-host/nats-cluster-bench-ns1.md

@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+**Progress report (second study)** · run `20260912T051237Z` (UTC)
+
+> **Execution provenance.** Every process for this study ran on **NS1.GEORGELAMBERT.ORG** (`70.88.205.138`): the orchestrator (`study-on-ns1.sh`), `nats bench`, `latency.mjs` (inside LXC 510 on this hypervisor), charting (`matplotlib`), and HTML/PDF (`pandoc` + `weasyprint`). The operator laptop did **not** publish, subscribe, draw charts, or render the PDF. Traffic stayed on `vmbr1` from LXC **510** to `nats-a/b/c` (**511–513**).
+
+This is a full methodology write-up plus the numbers from that on-host run. The earlier report (`nats-cluster-bench`, run `20260912T045131Z`) used the same cluster but was **orchestrated and rendered off-box**. Use this document when you need “it was all run on 138.”
+
+---
+
+## 1. Executive summary
+
+| Item | This NS1-host run |
+|------|-------------------|
+| Control plane | NS1.GEORGELAMBERT.ORG (`70.88.205.138`), user `marchon` |
+| Bench client | LXC 510 `verae-px-worker` |
+| Brokers | LXC 511/512/513 `nats-a/b/c` on `10.10.10.21–23` |
+| Client URL | `nats://10.10.10.21:4222,nats://10.10.10.22:4222,nats://10.10.10.23:4222` |
+| Host load before | `8.59 8.39 8.15 5/3843 4096277` |
+| Host load after | `8.67 8.33 8.15 9/3863 4114865` |
+| Core 1p1s 128 B pub | 502,502 msgs/s |
+| JetStream 1p 128 B r=3 | 7,393 durable pubs/s |
+| Ping p50 / p99 | 0.395ms / 1.377ms |
+
+Product traffic is the JetStream row. Ping is one-message delay. Flood is mailbox catch-up after a burst.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Where it ran (and where it did not)
+
+```text
+Operator laptop  ──ssh──►  NS1.GEORGELAMBERT.ORG  70.88.205.138
+                              study-on-ns1.sh
+                              python3 build-ns1-study-report.py
+                              sudo pct exec 510 ──► nats bench / latency.mjs
+                                                    │
+                                                    ▼ vmbr1
+                                              10.10.10.21-23 :4222
+```
+
+- **Did run on 138:** bash, python3, matplotlib, pandoc, weasyprint, `pct`, nats-server (in LXC), nats CLI and Node (in LXC 510).
+- **Did not run on the laptop:** no local `nats bench`, no local charting, no local WeasyPrint for this file.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Results (this run)
+
+### Host and brokers
+
+**Before**
+
+| Node | VMID | connections | in_msgs | out_msgs | cpu | cores | mem (B) | jetstream |
+|------|------|-------------|---------|----------|-----|-------|---------|-----------|
+| nats-a | 511 | 2 | 1,721,203 | 4,933,759 | 1 | 1 | 26,398,720 | True |
+| nats-b | 512 | 2 | 1,613,205 | 3,513,096 | 0 | 1 | 23,097,344 | True |
+| nats-c | 513 | 2 | 1,760,973 | 4,048,582 | 2 | 1 | 23,867,392 | True |
+
+**After**
+
+| Node | VMID | connections | in_msgs | out_msgs | cpu | cores | mem (B) | jetstream |
+|------|------|-------------|---------|----------|-----|-------|---------|-----------|
+| nats-a | 511 | 2 | 2,097,596 | 5,910,161 | 1 | 1 | 38,273,024 | True |
+| nats-b | 512 | 2 | 2,121,816 | 4,746,539 | 1 | 1 | 41,361,408 | True |
+| nats-c | 513 | 2 | 2,241,366 | 5,053,978 | 1 | 1 | 38,162,432 | True |
+
+nproc=40 · uname=`Linux NS1.GEORGELAMBERT.ORG 6.17.2-1-pve #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC PMX 6.17.2-1 (2025-10-21T11:55Z) x86_64 GNU/Linux`
+
+### Throughput
+
+| Run | Mode | Aggregate msgs/s | Pub msgs/s | Pub MB/s | Sub msgs/s | Sub MB/s |
+|-----|------|------------------|------------|----------|------------|----------|
+| `core-1p1s-50k-128` | core pub/sub | 776,331 | 502,502 | 61.34 | 420,976 | 51.39 |
+| `core-4p4s-100k-128` | core pub/sub | 1,278,454 | 379,985 | 46.38 | 1,078,910 | 131.70 |
+| `core-4p4s-50k-1k` | core pub/sub | 581,464 | 209,545 | 204.63 | 482,645 | 471.33 |
+| `core-8p8s-200k-128` | core pub/sub | 2,065,217 | 333,731 | 40.74 | 1,847,242 | 225.49 |
+| `js-1p-20k-128-r3` | jetstream r=3 file | — | 7,393 | 0.90 | — | — |
+| `js-2p2s-20k-128-r3` | jetstream r=3 file | 15,416 | 7,728 | 0.94 | 7,711 | 0.94 |
+| `js-4p-20k-1k-r3` | jetstream r=3 file | — | 14,985 | 14.63 | — | — |
+| `js-4p-50k-128-r3` | jetstream r=3 file | — | 17,986 | 2.20 | — | — |
+
+### Round-trip delay
+
+| Run | Kind | Count | Pubs | Size | min | avg | p50 | p90 | p99 | max |
+|-----|------|-------|------|------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|
+| `lat-ping-1k-128` | ping (sequential RTT) | 1000 | 1 | 128 B | 0.341ms | 0.470ms | 0.395ms | 0.651ms | 1.377ms | 3.243ms |
+| `lat-1p-5k-128` | flood (burst queueing) | 5000 | 1 | 128 B | 132.425ms | 203.717ms | 204.458ms | 241.750ms | 249.468ms | 249.640ms |
+| `lat-4p-5k-1k` | flood (burst queueing) | 5000 | 4 | 1024 B | 196.422ms | 221.264ms | 224.039ms | 233.180ms | 236.798ms | 238.177ms |
+| `lat-4p-10k-128` | flood (burst queueing) | 10000 | 4 | 128 B | 211.108ms | 294.925ms | 300.254ms | 314.223ms | 315.551ms | 316.091ms |
+| `lat-8p-20k-128` | flood (burst queueing) | 20000 | 8 | 128 B | 280.608ms | 414.972ms | 409.802ms | 513.821ms | 535.394ms | 536.084ms |
+
+### Core NATS
+
+![Core NATS throughput at four loads (NS1 host run)](charts/core-throughput.png)
+
+*Core NATS throughput at four loads (NS1 host run)*
+### Payload size (core)
+
+![Core NATS 128 B vs 1 KiB (NS1 host run)](charts/payload-size.png)
+
+*Core NATS 128 B vs 1 KiB (NS1 host run)*
+### JetStream r=3 file
+
+![JetStream durable publish rate (NS1 host run)](charts/js-throughput.png)
+
+*JetStream durable publish rate (NS1 host run)*
+### Core vs JetStream
+
+![Core vs JetStream publish rate, log scale (NS1 host run)](charts/core-vs-js.png)
+
+*Core vs JetStream publish rate, log scale (NS1 host run)*
+### Delay
+
+![Ping vs flood delay percentiles, log scale (NS1 host run)](charts/delay-percentiles.png)
+
+*Ping vs flood delay percentiles, log scale (NS1 host run)*
+
+---
+
+## 4. Study methodology
+
+### 4.1 Question
+
+On the NS1 test stand, what message **throughput** and **delay** does the three-node `verae` JetStream cluster deliver at several loads, and which part of the stack is the limiter for product traffic (jobs, events, webhooks, archive)?
+
+### 4.2 Hypotheses (stated before the run)
+
+1. **H1 — Core vs JetStream.** Fire-and-forget core NATS is at least an order of magnitude faster than JetStream **file + replicas=3**, because durable publish waits for a majority disk replica.
+2. **H2 — JetStream parallelism.** Adding publishers does **not** linearly increase JetStream write rate once the replica log is saturated.
+3. **H3 — Quiet delay.** Sequential pub→sub round trip on `vmbr1` is well under 1 ms p99 when the consumer is waiting.
+4. **H4 — Burst delay.** If publishers dump a batch before the subscriber drains, observed delay is **queueing time**, roughly linear in backlog, not in cluster hop count.
+5. **H5 — Payload.** Moving 128 B → 1 KiB lowers message rate and raises byte rate on core NATS; JetStream in this size band stays replica/fsync bound.
+
+### 4.3 Independent variables (what we changed)
+
+| Factor | Levels |
+|--------|--------|
+| Transport | Core NATS pub/sub vs JetStream file replicas=3 |
+| Publisher count | 1, 2, 4, 8 |
+| Subscriber count | 0 (JS publish-only), 1, 2, 4, 8 |
+| Message count | 1k, 5k, 10k, 20k, 50k, 100k, 200k (by ladder step) |
+| Payload | 128 B, 1024 B |
+| Delay mode | **ping** (publish, wait, repeat) vs **flood** (publish all, then drain) |
+
+### 4.4 Dependent variables (what we recorded)
+
+| Metric | Instrument | Unit |
+|--------|------------|------|
+| Publish rate | `nats bench` 0.1.6 Pub stats | msgs/s, MB/s |
+| Subscribe rate | `nats bench` Sub stats | msgs/s, MB/s |
+| Aggregate | `nats bench` NATS Pub/Sub stats | msgs/s (fan-out counts both sides) |
+| Publisher spread | nats min/avg/max **msgs/s** | not delay |
+| One-way-ish RTT | `latency.mjs` header timestamp | min, avg, p50, p90, p99, max |
+| Host load | `/proc/loadavg` before and after | load average |
+| Broker counters | `http://127.0.0.1:8222/varz` inside each nats LXC | connections, in/out msgs, cpu, mem |
+
+**Important:** nats CLI 0.1.6 min/avg/max are **rate spread across publishers**, not microseconds of delay. Delay is only `latency.mjs`.
+
+### 4.5 Controls and constants
+
+- Cluster name `verae`, three routes, client `:4222`, cluster `:6222`, monitor loopback `:8222`.
+- Client URL always the three-node list on `vmbr1` (never host `127.0.0.1:4222`, never `vmbr0`).
+- Bench client is LXC **510**, not a nats-* server.
+- JetStream bench stream name `benchstream`, **file** storage, **replicas=3**, deleted between JS loads (`nats stream rm --force`) so names do not collide.
+- Product streams were **not** the bench target (no load test on `ZAPIER_*` / `VERAE_ARCHIVE`).
+- No TLS, no nkeys, no account isolation (isolation is `vmbr1`).
+- Same nats CLI version (0.1.6) and `nats@2` Node client as the first ladder.
+
+### 4.6 Procedure
+
+1. Confirm this script is executing on **NS1.GEORGELAMBERT.ORG**. Refuse otherwise.
+2. Snapshot host load, memory, LXC configs, and each nats `varz`.
+3. From NS1, `pct exec 510` the core ladder (1p1s, 4p4s, 8p8s at 128 B; 4p4s at 1 KiB).
+4. Delete `benchstream`; JS ladder (1p, 4p, 4p×1 KiB, 2p2s pull) at replicas=3 file.
+5. Copy `latency.mjs` into 510; ping then flood at several batch sizes.
+6. Snapshot host/`varz` again.
+7. Parse logs on **this host**; draw charts; write HTML and PDF on **this host**.
+
+No publish, subscribe, chart, or PDF process runs on the operator laptop for this study.
+
+### 4.7 Instrumentation path
+
+```text
+[NS1 host 70.88.205.138]
+   study-on-ns1.sh  (bash + python3)
+        |
+        | sudo pct exec 510
+        v
+[LXC 510 verae-px-worker 10.10.10.20]
+   nats bench / node latency.mjs
+        |
+        | NATS client protocol to
+        v
+[LXC 511/512/513  10.10.10.21-23 :4222]
+   nats-server -js  cluster routes :6222
+```
+
+The hypervisor issues the guest commands. The messages themselves never leave `vmbr1`.
+
+### 4.8 Threats to validity
+
+| Threat | Effect on numbers |
+|--------|-------------------|
+| **One physical host** | Three “replicas” share CPU, memory, and usually the same datastore. This measures process/LXC HA, not disk HA. |
+| **Shared load** | NS1 also runs Caddy, Forgejo, keep, fleet, portal, and other CTs. Load average during a run is part of the result, not noise to ignore. |
+| **Single bench client** | All publishers live in 510. Per-publisher rate spread is contention in that guest. |
+| **Short runs** | Seconds of traffic. No compaction, no multi-hour page-cache eviction, no snapshot during load. |
+| **No TLS/nkeys** | Production auth will cost CPU. Do not treat these rates as post-nkeys rates. |
+| **Fan-out aggregate** | Core aggregate msgs/s counts pub+sub. Do not compare that column to JetStream unique writes. |
+| **Flood ≠ RTT** | Mixing flood averages with ping p99 produces a fake “NATS is slow” story. |
+| **Lab only** | Not a Zapier HTTPS bench and not live `api.veraetime.net`. |
+
+### 4.9 Ethics / safety
+
+Bench uses throwaway subjects (`bench.core.*`, `bench.js.*`, `bench.lat.*`) and a throwaway stream. It does not purge product streams. Zapier cloud has no NATS socket.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Suggestions for fine-tuning
+
+These follow from the method and from the first ladder on this stand (JetStream ~16k durable 128 B pubs/s; ping ~0.3 ms; flood hundreds of ms). Apply in order of leverage. Re-run **this NS1 study** after each change so the delta is measured the same way.
+
+### 5.1 Treat JetStream as the product limiter
+
+Product jobs/events/webhooks/archive are durable. Tuning core NATS to 2M msgs/s will not move a timestamp Zap. Put effort into **replica write path** and **consumer lag**, not core fan-out.
+
+### 5.2 Split storage class by stream
+
+| Stream | Suggested store | Why |
+|--------|-----------------|-----|
+| `ZAPIER_JOBS` | file, r=3 | Work queue; lose-a-job is bad |
+| `ZAPIER_EVENTS` | file r=3, or memory r=3 if events are rebuildable from job status | Hot waiters; measure both |
+| `ZAPIER_WEBHOOKS` | file, r=3, workqueue | HTTPS to Zapier is the slow consumer |
+| `ZAPIER_USAGE` | file, r=3, limits + max-age | Telemetry |
+| `VERAE_ARCHIVE` | file, r=3, on the **best disk** | Puts are larger and must survive |
+
+Try `ZAPIER_EVENTS` as memory store in a maintenance window and re-run only the JS + ping/flood steps. If ping stays ~0.3 ms and durable events still ack at a higher rate, keep it; if a CT restart drops in-flight waiters, revert.
+
+### 5.3 Give JetStream real disks
+
+Today r=3 on three LXC guests on **one Proxmox host** is three files, one failure domain.
+
+- Bind-mount a distinct SSD/NVMe (or ZFS dataset with its own vdev) into each nats LXC `store_dir`.
+- Set `sync: always` only on archive if you need it; default sync is often enough for jobs and is faster. Measure.
+- Do not put JetStream `store_dir` on the same busy rootfs as Forgejo/Caddy if we can avoid it.
+- When moving to three metal boxes: same configs, private NIC, one disk (or mirror) **per node**. That is the first change that makes r=3 mean “two boxes can die.”
+
+### 5.4 Isolate the nats CTs from the rest of NS1
+
+Host load on this box is often already several. Pin:
+
+- `nats-a/b/c`: dedicated cores, no steal from keep/fleet Node processes.
+- Memory high enough that file-backed streams stay cache-hot for the working set.
+- `cpuunits` / cpuset in `pct config` so a Zapier-facing Node GC pause does not stall fsync.
+
+Re-run this study after pinning; H1/H2 should move more than ping.
+
+### 5.5 Consumer and mailbox tuning (delay H4)
+
+Flood delay is backlog / consume_rate. Fine-tune the **waiters**, not the broker RTT.
+
+- `jobs.events` and `webhooks.deliver`: raise `max_ack_pending` so a slow HTTPS hook does not stall the whole consumer; cap it so a poison message cannot unbounded-buffer RAM.
+- Pull consumers: larger batch, shorter `expires`, more pullers horizontally (fleet replica floors) instead of one fat subscriber.
+- Middleware should **not** flood-publish then wait; it already does per-job publish. Keep that. The flood test is the outage profile when a consumer is stopped.
+- Alert on **consumer lag** (pending + ack pending) from JetStream, not on ping RTT.
+
+### 5.6 Publisher-side batching in middleware
+
+A timestamp job is one small JSON. 16k msgs/s is ample. Still:
+
+- Avoid per-byte publishes; one message per job/event.
+- Reuse NATS connections (connection churn showed up as publisher spread in the core 4p/8p runs).
+- Idempotent `msg id` / duplicate window sized to Verae retry window, not default-only.
+
+### 5.7 nats-server knobs worth measuring (A/B with this script)
+
+| Knob | Why try it |
+|------|------------|
+| `max_payload` | Keep default unless archive puts grow |
+| `write_deadline` | Slow consumer protection for webhooks |
+| `max_pending` | Bound memory on a stuck Zapier hook |
+| `max_connections` | Fleet workers + keep + middleware |
+| JetStream `max_file_store` / `max_memory_store` | Prevent one stream from filling the CT |
+| `max_outstanding_catchup` | Replica restart after a nats-c blip |
+| GOMAXPROCS = LXC cores | Do not overthread a 2-core CT |
+
+Change **one** knob, re-run `study-on-ns1.sh`, compare JetStream 1p 128 B and ping p99.
+
+### 5.8 Network
+
+- Keep NATS off `vmbr0`. No change.
+- When on metal: dedicated NIC or VLAN for cluster `:6222` vs client `:4222` if possible (replication vs client load).
+- Check virtio queue counts on the LXC nics if core 1 KiB byte rate plateaus.
+
+### 5.9 Security cost (when nkeys/mTLS flip)
+
+`verae-nats-accounts` is still a sketch. Enabling accounts will add CPU on publish. Budget: re-run this exact study **after** creds are in every `NATS_URL`, and accept a drop on both core and JS. Do not flip without that measurement.
+
+### 5.10 Operational fine-tuning (lag, not peak msgs/s)
+
+1. Scrape `varz` / `jsz` from the host over `vmbr1` (not public). Monitor loopback `:8222` is invisible to Prometheus on NS1 unless we add a host-side proxy on `10.10.10.21:8222` bound only to `vmbr1`.
+2. Keep replica floors for webhook-deliver and job-poller — they are the flood defense.
+3. Backup/restore drill of JetStream **during idle**, then a short JS 1p run to see catchup cost.
+4. A 15–30 minute soak (not in this ladder) for page cache and compaction; add that as a third study when disks are dedicated.
+
+### 5.11 What not to tune
+
+- Do not chase core 8p8s aggregate. It is fan-out on a lab bridge.
+- Do not treat flood 400 ms as “cluster RTT.” Fix consumers.
+- Do not load-test on `ZAPIER_*` streams.
+- Do not bind client NATS to `0.0.0.0` on `vmbr0`.
+
+### 5.12 Recommended next experiments (same method, one change each)
+
+1. CPU pin nats-a/b/c → re-run JS 1p + ping.
+2. `ZAPIER_EVENTS`-shaped memory stream vs file (throwaway stream, same flags as this JS ladder).
+3. Distinct `store_dir` disks per node.
+4. nkeys on, same ladder.
+5. Three hardware boxes, same `cluster.env` IPs updated.
+
+Each experiment should produce a new `results/<utc>/` on NS1 and a new progress-repo report so we can diff H1–H5 instead of arguing from memory.
+
+
+---
+
+## 6. Reproducing this study
+
+On **NS1 only**:
+
+```bash
+cd ~/verae-src/verae-nats-cluster
+bash scripts/study-on-ns1.sh
+```
+
+The script exits if `hostname` is not NS1. Outputs land in `results/<utc>/` including `nats-cluster-bench-ns1.{md,html,pdf}` and `charts/`. Copy those into `zapier-decisions/reports/` for the progress repo and catalog.
+
+Raw logs for this run: `results/20260912T051237Z/`.