docs: align priorities with IG charter
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 3ce9ad35-1e45-451f-98f6-802946669ba8
This commit is contained in:
parent
2c6eb7f686
commit
43df8e912c
1 changed files with 28 additions and 15 deletions
|
|
@ -1,33 +1,46 @@
|
|||
# Priorities for the Next Specification Iteration
|
||||
|
||||
This is a non-binding summary of where the Tool Annotations Interest Group
|
||||
believes its attention would be most useful next. The IG has no formal remit to
|
||||
set the MCP roadmap or determine the disposition of SEPs; these priorities are
|
||||
intended to focus discussion, implementation, and feedback.
|
||||
This is a non-binding summary of where the
|
||||
[Tool Annotations Interest Group](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/community/interest-groups/tool-annotations)
|
||||
believes its attention would be most useful next. Consistent with its charter,
|
||||
the IG gathers use cases, evaluates proposals, and makes recommendations. It
|
||||
does not set the MCP roadmap, make binding specification decisions, or own SDK
|
||||
implementation; these priorities are intended to focus discussion and feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Mature Existing Extension Work
|
||||
|
||||
Complete the transition of existing SEP proposals into fully fledged
|
||||
experimental extensions. Each extension should have SDK implementations and
|
||||
clear evidence that the community wants and will use it before it is proposed
|
||||
for graduation.
|
||||
Support maintainers and contributors in completing the
|
||||
[planned transition of existing SEP proposals](./sep-disposition.md) into fully
|
||||
fledged experimental extensions. The IG should gather use cases, coordinate
|
||||
review, and establish clear evidence that the community wants and will use each
|
||||
extension. Before an Extensions Track SEP is reviewed,
|
||||
[SEP-2133](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/blob/main/seps/2133-extensions.md)
|
||||
requires at least one reference implementation in an official SDK.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Prepare Pre-flight Requests for Review
|
||||
|
||||
Bring the pre-flight request proposal
|
||||
([SEP-1862](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/pull/1862))
|
||||
Bring the pre-flight request proposal,
|
||||
[SEP-1862: Tool Resolution](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/pull/1862),
|
||||
to a state where it is ready for substantive review. This remains a core
|
||||
protocol proposal rather than an experimental extension.
|
||||
protocol proposal rather than an experimental extension, as described in the
|
||||
[current SEP disposition](./sep-disposition.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Separate Human and Agent Content Presentation
|
||||
|
||||
Explore how content intended for human formatting and display can be represented
|
||||
separately from content intended for agents. The goal is to let clients provide
|
||||
good human-facing experiences without compromising the structured content
|
||||
agents need.
|
||||
agents need. This belongs in the chartered discussion of tool-response
|
||||
annotations and human-in-the-loop requirements, while any specification change
|
||||
would still proceed through the SEP process.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Evaluate Annotation Proposals
|
||||
|
||||
Gather the proposed annotation SEPs, evaluate how they relate to one another and
|
||||
to the extension work, and provide consolidated feedback to their authors and
|
||||
reviewers.
|
||||
Maintain an inventory of proposed annotation SEPs, evaluate how they relate to
|
||||
one another and to the extension work, and provide consolidated feedback to
|
||||
their authors and reviewers. The charter's current discussion list includes
|
||||
[SEP-1913](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/pull/1913),
|
||||
[SEP-1984](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/pull/1984),
|
||||
and
|
||||
[SEP-2417](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/pull/2417);
|
||||
the inventory should evolve as proposals are opened, revised, or closed.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue