- MDX 96.1%
- TypeScript 3.9%
| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
Aligns the proposed convention with the draft SEP: - skill-path is a locator of one or more segments, not the skill name; identity lives in SKILL.md frontmatter - authority component is the first path segment by RFC 3986 mechanics but carries no special semantics - add no-nesting constraint (SKILL.md cannot be ancestor of another) - resource templates are MAY and primarily user-facing via completion - enumeration via resources/list is optional; clients must not treat an empty list as proof of absence - add nested-path examples throughout The survey section is unchanged; it's historical record. |
||
| .github | ||
| docs | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| README.md | ||
Skills Over MCP Interest Group
⚠️ Experimental — This repository is an incubation space for the Skills Over MCP Interest Group. Contents are exploratory and do not represent official MCP specifications or recommendations.
Charter: modelcontextprotocol.io/community/skills-over-mcp/charter — mission, scope, membership, active work items, and success criteria. Project board: Skills Over MCP IG Meeting notes: Skills Over MCP IG discussions Discord: #skills-over-mcp-ig
Why Skills Over MCP?
MCP servers give agents tools, but tools alone are insufficient for complex workflows — tool descriptions tell an agent what a tool does, not how to orchestrate multiple tools to achieve a goal. Skills bridge this gap. They are structured "how-to" knowledge: multi-step workflows, conditional logic, and orchestration instructions that can run to hundreds of lines.
Skills are context, and MCP is a context protocol. Agents already connect to remote services over MCP to get tools — they can get the know-how to use those tools through the same channel. A remote MCP server can serve both its tools and the instructions for using them together, as a single atomic unit. This also enables automatic discovery (connect to a server, find its skills), dynamic updates (server-side changes flow without reinstall), multi-server composition (skills orchestrating tools across servers), and enterprise distribution (RBAC, multi-tenant, version-adaptive content) — all through infrastructure MCP servers already provide.
See why-and-when.md for the full value proposition and a guide for when MCP distribution applies vs. simpler alternatives.
Problem Statement
Native "skills" support in host applications demonstrates demand for rich workflow instructions, but there's no convention for exposing equivalent functionality through MCP primitives. Current limitations include:
- Server instructions load only at initialization — new or updated skills require re-initializing the server
- Complex workflows exceed practical instruction size — some skills require hundreds of lines of markdown with references to bundled files
- No discovery mechanism — users installing MCP servers don't know if there's a corresponding skill they should also install
- Multi-server orchestration — skills may need to coordinate tools from multiple servers
See problem-statement.md for full details.
Repository Contents
| Document | Description |
|---|---|
| Problem Statement | Current limitations and gaps |
| Why Skills Over MCP? | Value proposition and decision guide |
| Use Cases | Key use cases driving this work |
| Approaches | Approaches being explored (not mutually exclusive) |
| Open Questions | Unresolved questions with community input |
| Experimental Findings | Results from implementations and testing |
| Related Work | SEPs, implementations, and external resources |
| Decision Log | Record of key decisions with context and rationale |
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for how to participate.