- MDX 96.1%
- TypeScript 3.9%
| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
fff35ee496The working draft's Resource Metadata section omitted the sentence recommending the io.modelcontextprotocol.skills/ prefix for _meta keys, which is present in the submitted SEP-2640. Bring the repo-local copy back in line with the PR. |
||
| .github | ||
| docs | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| README.md | ||
Skills Over MCP Working Group
⚠️ Experimental — This repository is an incubation space for the Skills Over MCP Working Group. Contents are exploratory and do not represent official MCP specifications or recommendations.
Charter: modelcontextprotocol.io/community/skills-over-mcp/charter — mission, scope, membership, active work items, and success criteria. Project board: Skills Over MCP WG Meeting notes: Skills Over MCP WG discussions Discord: #skills-over-mcp-wg Open work: Pull requests — proposals, decisions, implementations, and other in-flight contributions welcome.
Why Skills Over MCP?
MCP servers give agents tools, but tools alone are insufficient for complex workflows — tool descriptions tell an agent what a tool does, not how to orchestrate multiple tools to achieve a goal. Skills bridge this gap. They are structured "how-to" knowledge: multi-step workflows, conditional logic, and orchestration instructions that can run to hundreds of lines.
Skills are context, and MCP is a context protocol. Agents already connect to remote services over MCP to get tools — they can get the know-how to use those tools through the same channel. A remote MCP server can serve both its tools and the instructions for using them together, as a single atomic unit. This also enables automatic discovery (connect to a server, find its skills), dynamic updates (server-side changes flow without reinstall), multi-server composition (skills orchestrating tools across servers), and enterprise distribution (RBAC, multi-tenant, version-adaptive content) — all through infrastructure MCP servers already provide.
See why-and-when.md for the full value proposition and a guide for when MCP distribution applies vs. simpler alternatives.
Problem Statement
Native "skills" support in host applications demonstrates demand for rich workflow instructions, but there's no convention for exposing equivalent functionality through MCP primitives. Current limitations include:
- Server instructions load only at initialization — new or updated skills require re-initializing the server
- Complex workflows exceed practical instruction size — some skills require hundreds of lines of markdown with references to bundled files
- No discovery mechanism — users installing MCP servers don't know if there's a corresponding skill they should also install
- Multi-server orchestration — skills may need to coordinate tools from multiple servers
See problem-statement.md for full details.
Repository Contents
| Document | Description |
|---|---|
| Problem Statement | Current limitations and gaps |
| Why Skills Over MCP? | Value proposition and decision guide |
| Use Cases | Key use cases driving this work |
| Approaches | Approaches being explored (not mutually exclusive) |
| SEP-2640: Skills Extension | Proposal to serve skills over MCP via the Resources primitive. Original working draft: docs/sep-draft-skills-extension.md. Comments and review happen on the PR. |
| Open Questions | Unresolved questions with community input (see also issues and meeting notes) |
| Experimental Findings | Results from implementations and testing |
| Related Work | SEPs, implementations, and external resources |
| Decision Log | Record of key decisions with context and rationale |
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for how to participate.