This change adjusts the code example in readme so if you view it in
github it won't show a horizontal scroll bar in code example.
It's trivial change, but I believe it's still an improvement.
Add example/server/toolschemas, which demonstrates various ways to
customize tool schemas, and illustrates the differences between
ToolHandler and ToolHandlerFor.
Fixes#385Fixes#386
For #368
Replace all occurrences of ServerRequest[*CallToolParams] and other
concrete instantiations with CallToolRequest and the like.
Make the XXXRequest types aliases, to preserve the convenience of
generics for the internal machinery (see shared.go, for example.)
I will expand the aliases in a followup PR.
Change the design of tool handlers by removing genericity from the common path.
- `ToolHandler` gets the args as a `json.RawMessage`. Using Server.AddTool does no unmarshaling or schema validation.
- `ToolHandlerFor`, installed with `AddTool`, are the only generic pieces.
TODO:
uncomment and fix some tests
Handlers and client/server methods take a single request argument
combining the session and params. This slightly simplifies the signature
for handlers, since there is no longer an often-ignored session
argument.
But more importantly, it opens the door to adding more information in
requests, such as auth info and HTTP request headers.
For #243.
As described in #272, there is really no reason for transports to be
closed structs with constructors, since their state must be established
by a call to Connect. Making them open structs simplifies their APIs,
and means that all transports can be extended in the future: we don't
have to create empty Options structs just for the purpose of future
compatibility.
For now, the related constructors and options structs are simply
deprecated (with go:fix directives where possible). A future CL will
remove them prior to the v1.0.0 release.
For #272
BREAKING CHANGE
Change the API for adding tools, prompts, resources and resource
templates to a server.
The ServerXXX types are gone along with the plural Add methods
(AddTools, AddPrompts etc.)
Instead there are single Add methods (AddTool, AddPrompt).
In addition, instead of NewServerTool, there is AddTool[In, Out].
Fixes#73.
Fix an example using params.Name instead of params.Arguments.Name. All
credit due to @A11Might for noticing this. Sending a separate PR to keep
the internal/readme source consistent.
After some experience with the flattened version of Content, we see that
it can easily lead to incorrect usage and is a harder API to read.
Therefore, this CL changes back to a design similar to what we had prior
to https://go.dev/cl/672415, though opting to promote content
unmarshalling to the protocol types that use it, which leads to an
overall simpler api.
* mcp: move to 2025-06-18 schema
Add types and fields for the latest MCP schema.
The main challenge here was dealing with the presence of _meta fields
on many types, like Tool, Prompt and Resource.
- Distinguish between the _meta field of a request's params, which
includes a progress token, from the _meta field on other types,
which is simply a map.
- Redefine GetMeta to return a pointer to the map. We wanted to avoid
that, but I don't see a clean way to do so. An alternative would be
to have GetMeta return a map, and SetMeta to set it.
- Provide GetProgressToken for requests only (not notifications or other
types).
- Still to do: deal with the meta and annotation fields of ContentBlock,
which are currently duplicated for Resource and ResourceContents.
* Meta and progress token redesign
In CL 682976, Alan Donovan correctly points out that the term in the MCP
spec is 'stdio', and therefore the correct capitalization is Stdio.
Change-Id: Ib5bbe04f1a61de886298b4d0adc13aefd6aadd9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/683075
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Change CONTRIBUTING.md and README.md to reflect that the MCP SDK is
being moved to github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk, and to include
content from the 'Governance' section of the design doc. Also, include
the antitrust policy as a section in CONTRIBUTING.md.
Change-Id: I46784d8e57b2a2cab8895593f633d20a2e15c8ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/682976
Reviewed-by: Sam Thanawalla <samthanawalla@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The NewTool and NewPrompt constructors were unidiomatic, because they
returned a ServerTool and ServerPrompt, respectively, rather than a Tool
and Prompt. Rename to be consistent with the constructed object name.
Change-Id: Ife3f16f783368401f792660c4272e1bb5ae61638
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/682375
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
CallToolParams.Arguments is any.
Clients can send whatever they want.
Tool authors who create their own ToolHandler (bypassing NewTool)
will receive the arguments as a map[string]any which has been
validated against the input schema.
Tool authors who call NewTool can choose the type that the arguments
unmarshal into.
There is no double-unmarshaling and no downcasting.
There is no way for tool authors to avoid the unmarshal, and no way to
avoid the validation unless the omit an input schema, which is probably
bad for LLMs. If tool authors want this optimization, we can provide
it later.
Change-Id: Ieb201e56c7fb8a23bb1a93b27e946630ec9e79ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/679595
TryBot-Bypass: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Make Tool APIs future-proof by pushing generics into CallToolParams, and
using CallToolParams throughout. This has several advantages:
- We no longer need the awkward CallToolOptions type, which is almost
but not quite like CallToolParams.
- NewTool no longer needs to define its own handler type: it accepts a
ToolHandler[TArgs]. This also means its signature is future-proof.
Additionally, provide a `CallTool` helper (the analog of NewTool) to
serve as a more strongly typed variant of `ClientSession.CallTool`.
+ design, protocol generation
Change-Id: I80172a25bc50734dae84a541aa4776ed9161694e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/676495
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Change-Id: I8066b22cb87e09fb160de3b8ff2d8fdde6ec3dcf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/675815
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Use the weave program from golang.org/x/example to weave together
the README text with buildable programs. This ensures the code in the
README compiles.
Change-Id: Ib5e10c8f808cc6d1ed4addbee784607e910ba30b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/673796
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
