Change the design of tool handlers by removing genericity from the common path.
- `ToolHandler` gets the args as a `json.RawMessage`. Using Server.AddTool does no unmarshaling or schema validation.
- `ToolHandlerFor`, installed with `AddTool`, are the only generic pieces.
TODO:
uncomment and fix some tests
BREAKING CHANGE
Change the API for adding tools, prompts, resources and resource
templates to a server.
The ServerXXX types are gone along with the plural Add methods
(AddTools, AddPrompts etc.)
Instead there are single Add methods (AddTool, AddPrompt).
In addition, instead of NewServerTool, there is AddTool[In, Out].
Fixes#73.
After some experience with the flattened version of Content, we see that
it can easily lead to incorrect usage and is a harder API to read.
Therefore, this CL changes back to a design similar to what we had prior
to https://go.dev/cl/672415, though opting to promote content
unmarshalling to the protocol types that use it, which leads to an
overall simpler api.
* mcp: move to 2025-06-18 schema
Add types and fields for the latest MCP schema.
The main challenge here was dealing with the presence of _meta fields
on many types, like Tool, Prompt and Resource.
- Distinguish between the _meta field of a request's params, which
includes a progress token, from the _meta field on other types,
which is simply a map.
- Redefine GetMeta to return a pointer to the map. We wanted to avoid
that, but I don't see a clean way to do so. An alternative would be
to have GetMeta return a map, and SetMeta to set it.
- Provide GetProgressToken for requests only (not notifications or other
types).
- Still to do: deal with the meta and annotation fields of ContentBlock,
which are currently duplicated for Resource and ResourceContents.
* Meta and progress token redesign
The NewTool and NewPrompt constructors were unidiomatic, because they
returned a ServerTool and ServerPrompt, respectively, rather than a Tool
and Prompt. Rename to be consistent with the constructed object name.
Change-Id: Ife3f16f783368401f792660c4272e1bb5ae61638
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/682375
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
CallToolParams.Arguments is any.
Clients can send whatever they want.
Tool authors who create their own ToolHandler (bypassing NewTool)
will receive the arguments as a map[string]any which has been
validated against the input schema.
Tool authors who call NewTool can choose the type that the arguments
unmarshal into.
There is no double-unmarshaling and no downcasting.
There is no way for tool authors to avoid the unmarshal, and no way to
avoid the validation unless the omit an input schema, which is probably
bad for LLMs. If tool authors want this optimization, we can provide
it later.
Change-Id: Ieb201e56c7fb8a23bb1a93b27e946630ec9e79ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/679595
TryBot-Bypass: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Make Tool APIs future-proof by pushing generics into CallToolParams, and
using CallToolParams throughout. This has several advantages:
- We no longer need the awkward CallToolOptions type, which is almost
but not quite like CallToolParams.
- NewTool no longer needs to define its own handler type: it accepts a
ToolHandler[TArgs]. This also means its signature is future-proof.
Additionally, provide a `CallTool` helper (the analog of NewTool) to
serve as a more strongly typed variant of `ClientSession.CallTool`.
+ design, protocol generation
Change-Id: I80172a25bc50734dae84a541aa4776ed9161694e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/676495
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This change is necessary to support pagination which will be implemented
in subsequent CLs.
Change-Id: I8bc616a57463ea569dc7cadf1d4f06c69602ddd5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/674135
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
