With the suffixes I end up a little lost in the “box” noise while I'm
reading — the channel ops alone suffice to make the storage mechanism
clear.
(To me, the mechanism of storing a value in a 1-buffered channel is
conceptually similar to storing it in a pointer, atomic.Pointer, or
similar — and we don't generally name those with a suffix either.)
For golang/go#46047.
For golang/go#46520.
For golang/go#49387.
Change-Id: I7f58a9ac532f597fe49ed70606d89bd8cbe33b55
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/443355
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Otherwise, the Await method on the corresponding AsyncCall will never
unblock, leading to a deadlock (detected by the test changes in
CL 388597).
For golang/go#46047
For golang/go#46520
For golang/go#49387
Change-Id: I7954f80786059772ddd7f8c98d8752d56d074919
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/388775
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
(*Server).run calls Wait on all of its connections before returning,
but does not call Close explicitly. If Close is necessary to
release resources (as is often the case for a net.Conn),
the server ends up leaking resources.
For golang/go#46047
Change-Id: I4ad048c4f5e5d3f14f992eee6388acd42398c26b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/388599
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
This CL was created using the following commands:
./gopls/internal/migrate.sh
git add .
git codereview gofmt
For golang/go#54509
Change-Id: Iceeec602748a5e6f609c3ceda8d19157e5c94009
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/426796
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
As of golang/go#50827, gopls no longer needs to build at Go 1.12. This
was the only reason to continue using xerrors in the jsonrpc2 libraries.
Remove this usage as a step toward eliminating the xerrors dependency
from x/tools.
For golang/go#52442
Change-Id: I1a0a1bbf57e6606c66b99b27439adf6f65c26a60
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/401155
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Change-Id: Iaad847631b9d5ee40558fcf9d51f4dfa99600e6b
GitHub-Last-Rev: 6fcb64f8d9a093e7bd949e5d28bd1176c27005c0
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#372
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/389595
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Trust: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
If a call request comes it at the same time that a response becomes
ready for another call (either via an explicit Respond call or the
return from a Handle call), the map read and deletion for the response
could race with the map assignment for the new (incoming) call.
Change-Id: Ifd81dbc490486251e81c7eeae438806356f514af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/388595
Trust: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Update the new binder tests to run both with a standalone server, and
with a forwarding chain.
Make a few superficial improvements along the way as well.
Change-Id: Icd197698093a3f6149ab58171806b2388ed75b7f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/321134
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
The lsprpc package needs to wait on the newly bound connection to
perform some tear-down, so it must be safe to call conn.Wait from Bind.
Achieve this by switching async from an init pattern to a constructor.
This means moving async fields to pointers, but since they weren't safe
to use prior to initialization anyway this feels correct.
Change-Id: I4f93980915e0b568fbf2db3cd7d062adf06e4b99
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/330929
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
