fix: usable IPv6 spelling, and drop a SEP label that means something else here (round 2)

- The recovery text told users to move the endpoint to `::1`. A bare IPv6
  literal is not a legal URL host — `new URL("http://::1/token")` throws — so
  anyone copying that into the Token URL override got a parse error from advice
  meant to unblock them. Now `[::1]`, in both the notice and the manual
  reproduction guide.

  The exemption list still reads `::1`, because that is the host the SDK
  compares; only the remedy is bracketed, because that is what a user types.
  The comment says so, so neither gets "corrected" into the other.

- Dropped SEP-2207 from all nine files it had reached. I took the label from
  the SDK's own source comments, which attribute this check to it — but this
  repo already uses SEP-2207 for OIDC refresh / offline_access
  (specification/v2_auth_hardening.md, plus an e2e test), so grepping it here
  would have turned up two unrelated things. Replaced with plain description
  rather than a different SEP number: having guessed wrong once, guessing again
  is not the fix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018MvNbmAtQuWhDvzi4yXDju
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
This commit is contained in:
cliffhall 2026-09-07 09:54:17 -04:00
commit 084a083e2d
10 changed files with 30 additions and 21 deletions

View file

@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ usually looks like a missing capability rather than an error.
| A tool result's `structuredContent` section | `structured-output-http.json` (legacy) |
| RFC 6570 resource-template expansion | `rfc6570-templates-http.json` |
| OAuth token revocation on clear | `oauth-revocation-http.json` (legacy) |
| A token endpoint the SDK refuses (SEP-2207) | `oauth-insecure-token-endpoint-http.json` (legacy) |
| A token endpoint the SDK refuses | `oauth-insecure-token-endpoint-http.json` (legacy) |
| Cancelling a call mid-flight | `cancellation-modern-http.json` (modern) |
## Adding a config or preset

View file

@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ const lastClient = (h: Harness): InspectorClient => {
/**
* The last updater handed to `setReAuthBanner`, applied to a banner.
*
* Every terminal SEP-2207 arm clears the banner with a **functional** update
* Every terminal arm clears the banner with a **functional** update
* guarded on `serverId`, because these paths are asynchronous and a late
* continuation for one server must not erase a banner another raised in the
* meantime. The harness's setter is a spy, so the updater is never invoked for
@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ describe("useConnectionLifecycle", () => {
});
it("reports an insecure token endpoint as terminal, without flagging the card", async () => {
// SEP-2207 (#2280). Asserted on the hook, not just the notice helper,
// The terminal token-endpoint refusal (#2280). Asserted on the hook, not just the notice helper,
// because what makes this arm correct is its *position*: above
// `setFailedServerId` and above the generic toast. A helper-only test
// cannot see either of those go wrong.

View file

@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ export function useConnectionLifecycle({
});
return;
}
// SEP-2207 (#2280): a token endpoint the SDK will not post credentials
// A token endpoint the SDK will not post credentials
// to. Terminal, so it gets a notice of its own rather than the generic
// "Failed to connect" toast, whose detail line would be the raw SDK
// text.
@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ export function useConnectionLifecycle({
// held. The fetch log survives a disconnect, so the Network
// diagnostics this issue is about are unaffected.
await client.disconnect().catch(() => {});
// SEP-2207 (#2280). The retried `connect()` above can raise the
// The terminal token-endpoint refusal (#2280). The retried `connect()` above can raise the
// terminal refusal on its own — a satisfied challenge still ends in
// a token exchange — and reporting that as a failed connect attempt
// is doubly wrong here: the card goes red and the message is the
@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ export function useConnectionLifecycle({
});
return;
}
// See the SEP-2207 note on the handshake arm above (#2280). The
// See the note on the handshake arm above (#2280). The
// disconnect already happened at the top of this catch.
if (showInsecureTokenEndpointNotice(authErr, target.name)) {
setReAuthBanner((prev) =>
@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ export function useConnectionLifecycle({
authorizationUrl: authUrl,
});
} catch (err) {
// SEP-2207 (#2280), and this is the path a user reaches by *acting*:
// The terminal token-endpoint refusal (#2280), on the path a user reaches by *acting*:
// a connected session raises an ordinary re-auth banner, they click
// Re-authenticate, and the token exchange is refused. Without this
// the generic toast below reports it with the raw SDK text — the

View file

@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ describe("useOAuthRecovery", () => {
});
it("claims an insecure token endpoint on the command path instead of rethrowing", async () => {
// SEP-2207 (#2280). A mid-session silent refresh rejects here rather than
// The terminal token-endpoint refusal (#2280). A mid-session silent refresh rejects here rather than
// as an AuthRecoveryRequiredError, so before this it was rethrown into
// the generic reporting below.
const client = fakeClient();
@ -1876,7 +1876,7 @@ describe("useOAuthRecovery", () => {
});
it("reports an insecure token endpoint terminally, with no banner and no red card", async () => {
// SEP-2207 (#2280). The three assertions are the whole point of the arm's
// The terminal token-endpoint refusal (#2280). The three assertions are the whole point of the arm's
// position: the banner would carry a Re-authenticate button that cannot
// work, and flagging the card would present a configuration error as a
// failed connect attempt.

View file

@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ export function useOAuthRecovery({
);
/**
* Report a terminal SEP-2207 refusal (#2280) and clear any re-auth banner.
* Report a terminal terminal token-endpoint refusal (#2280) and clear any re-auth banner.
*
* Every arm goes through this rather than calling the notice helper directly.
* The banner clear is not incidental: a banner left from an *earlier* failure
@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ export function useOAuthRecovery({
options?: { reason?: AuthChallengeReason },
) => {
const server = sessionRef.current.servers.find((s) => s.id === serverId);
// SEP-2207 (#2280). The SDK rethrows `InsecureTokenEndpointError` instead
// The terminal token-endpoint refusal (#2280). The SDK rethrows `InsecureTokenEndpointError` instead
// of retrying, so the banner's "Re-authenticate" could only fail the same
// way. Claimed here, at the single funnel every re-auth banner goes
// through, rather than at each of its call sites — a new caller then gets
@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ export function useOAuthRecovery({
}
return undefined;
}
// SEP-2207 (#2280), on the command path. A mid-session silent refresh
// The terminal token-endpoint refusal (#2280), on the command path. A mid-session silent refresh
// against an unusable token endpoint rejects here rather than as an
// `AuthRecoveryRequiredError`, so without this it is rethrown and lands
// in `runCommandInBackground` — which either shows the raw SDK text
@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ export function useOAuthRecovery({
});
}
} catch (err) {
// SEP-2207 (#2280) first, and specifically BEFORE the restore below.
// The terminal token-endpoint refusal (#2280) first, and specifically BEFORE the restore below.
// `handleAuthChallenge` runs the same SDK auth flow, so it can raise
// this terminal error — and the restore's whole premise is that the
// recovery is still owed and a later trigger should retry it. For a

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/**
* Surfaces the SDK's SEP-2207 refusal to post credentials to a non-TLS token
* Surfaces the SDK's terminal token-endpoint refusal to post credentials to a non-TLS token
* endpoint as the terminal configuration error it is (#2280).
*
* Lives in `lib/` rather than `utils/` because showing a notification is a side

View file

@ -467,6 +467,9 @@ describe("insecureTokenEndpoint copy", () => {
expect(message).toContain(ENDPOINT);
expect(message).toContain("HTTPS");
expect(message).toContain("127.0.0.1");
// Bracketed: a bare IPv6 literal is not a legal URL host, so `::1` copied
// into the Token URL override would not parse.
expect(message).toContain("[::1]");
expect(message).toContain("Token URL override");
// The section name the UI actually renders. Sending someone to a settings
// section that does not exist is the worst error this message could make.

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/**
* SEP-2207: the SDK refuses to send credentials to a non-TLS token endpoint
* The SDK refuses to send credentials to a non-TLS token endpoint
* whose host is outside its loopback exemption (`localhost` / `127.0.0.1` /
* `::1`), throwing `InsecureTokenEndpointError` from inside
* `executeTokenRequest`.

View file

@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ export function reAuthBannerMessage(options: {
}
/**
* Heading for the SDK's SEP-2207 refusal to post credentials to a non-TLS token
* Heading for the SDK's terminal token-endpoint refusal to post credentials to a non-TLS token
* endpoint (#2280).
*
* Deliberately not phrased as an authentication failure. Like
@ -389,6 +389,12 @@ export function insecureTokenEndpointTitle(): string {
* legitimately sent earlier in the session, and a user who had been connected
* for an hour would rightly read it as describing a different failure.
*
* The exemption is listed as `::1` (that is the host the SDK compares) but the
* remedy says `[::1]`, because that is what a user must actually type: a bare
* IPv6 literal is not a legal URL host and `new URL("http://::1/token")`
* throws. The two spellings are deliberately different — do not "fix" either
* into the other.
*
* The section name is the one the UI actually renders — **OAuth Settings**,
* with a **Token URL override** field — not "Authorization". Sending someone to
* a settings section that does not exist is the worst possible error in the one
@ -418,8 +424,8 @@ export function insecureTokenEndpointMessage(options: {
`its token endpoint ${truncateUrlForDisplay(options.tokenEndpoint)} is ` +
"not HTTPS, and its host is outside the MCP SDK's loopback exemption, " +
"which covers only localhost, 127.0.0.1 and ::1. Re-authenticating cannot " +
"change this. Serve the token endpoint over HTTPS, or move it to one of " +
"those three spellings — Server Settings → OAuth Settings has a " +
"change this. Serve the token endpoint over HTTPS, or move it to " +
"localhost, 127.0.0.1 or [::1] — Server Settings → OAuth Settings has a " +
'"Token URL override" if the authorization server advertises a different ' +
"one."
);

View file

@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ as a missing capability rather than an error.
| `oauth-custom-resource-metadata-http.json` **(legacy era)** | OAuth discovery driven by the challenge's `resource_metadata` | [#2071](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2071) |
| `oauth-revocation-http.json` / `oauth-no-revocation-http.json` **(legacy era)** | RFC 7009 token revocation on clear, with and without a `revocation_endpoint` | [#2144](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2144) |
| `oauth-rfc8414-at-oidc-path-http.json` **(legacy era)** | Plain OAuth 2.0 AS metadata served at the OIDC well-known path | [#2172](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2172) |
| `oauth-insecure-token-endpoint-http.json` **(legacy era)** | A token endpoint the SDK refuses to post credentials to (SEP-2207) | [#2280](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2280) |
| `oauth-insecure-token-endpoint-http.json` **(legacy era)** | A token endpoint the SDK refuses to post credentials to | [#2280](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2280) |
| `logging-{legacy,modern}-http.json` **(era per file)** | Logging, both eras | [#1629](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/1629) |
| `subscriptions-{legacy,modern}-http.json` **(era per file)** | Resource subscriptions, both eras | [#1630](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/1630) |
| `subscriptions-never-acknowledged-http.json` **(modern era)** | A `subscriptions/listen` answered with a bare result | [#2097](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2097) |
@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ The same server is worth running against `--cli` / `--tui`, which reach it by a
The value now rides the normalized `AuthChallenge` as a string — it has to be serializable, because the web client's challenge crosses the remote-backend boundary as JSON — and is converted to a `URL` at the OAuth boundary, where it is handed to `auth()` as `resourceMetadataUrl` and to the CIMD pre-registration probe, which runs *before* `auth()` and would otherwise do its own default-location discovery. A malformed value is ignored rather than surfaced, matching the SDK's own `WWW-Authenticate` parser: discovery falls back to the default locations instead of failing the whole authorization on a bad header. The callback leg needs nothing extra — SDK `auth()` persists the URL in its discovery state, so it survives both the web full-page redirect and the CLI/TUI loopback callback.
## A token endpoint the SDK will not use (SEP-2207)
## A token endpoint the SDK will not use
`oauth-insecure-token-endpoint-http.json` is an ordinary combined AS + resource server with one thing changed: `oauth.issuerUrl` is `http://localhost.:8091`, so its advertised `token_endpoint` is `http://localhost.:8091/oauth/token`. Plain streamable-HTTP — connect with the **default (legacy)** protocol era.
@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ The trailing dot is the whole trick, and it is doing real work rather than being
Add the server, click **Connect**, and complete the authorization. The redirect comes back with a code, the Inspector goes to exchange it, and the SDK refuses.
What you should see is a red, non-expiring **"Token endpoint is not secure"** notification naming the endpoint and the two things that resolve it — serve it over HTTPS, or move it to one of the three host spellings the SDK exempts (`localhost`, `127.0.0.1`, `::1`). It stays until you close it (`autoClose: false` stops it expiring on a timer; Mantine's own close control still dismisses it, which is what you want for a message you have finished reading). There is deliberately **no** action button.
What you should see is a red, non-expiring **"Token endpoint is not secure"** notification naming the endpoint and the two things that resolve it — serve it over HTTPS, or move it to one of the three hosts the SDK exempts — `localhost`, `127.0.0.1`, or `[::1]` (bracketed, since a bare IPv6 literal is not a legal URL host). It stays until you close it (`autoClose: false` stops it expiring on a timer; Mantine's own close control still dismisses it, which is what you want for a message you have finished reading). There is deliberately **no** action button.
Note the second option is phrased as a *spelling* change, not a networking one. `localhost.` already **is** loopback, and so is `tenant.app.localhost`; what they are outside is a three-literal allow-list. Telling a reader to "use a loopback host" when they demonstrably already are is what sends them off to debug their resolver instead of their configuration.