fix: usable IPv6 spelling, and drop a SEP label that means something else here (round 2)
- The recovery text told users to move the endpoint to `::1`. A bare IPv6
literal is not a legal URL host — `new URL("http://::1/token")` throws — so
anyone copying that into the Token URL override got a parse error from advice
meant to unblock them. Now `[::1]`, in both the notice and the manual
reproduction guide.
The exemption list still reads `::1`, because that is the host the SDK
compares; only the remedy is bracketed, because that is what a user types.
The comment says so, so neither gets "corrected" into the other.
- Dropped SEP-2207 from all nine files it had reached. I took the label from
the SDK's own source comments, which attribute this check to it — but this
repo already uses SEP-2207 for OIDC refresh / offline_access
(specification/v2_auth_hardening.md, plus an e2e test), so grepping it here
would have turned up two unrelated things. Replaced with plain description
rather than a different SEP number: having guessed wrong once, guessing again
is not the fix.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018MvNbmAtQuWhDvzi4yXDju
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f12ce5aaf8
commit
084a083e2d
1 changed files with 30 additions and 21 deletions
|
|
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ as a missing capability rather than an error.
|
|||
| `oauth-custom-resource-metadata-http.json` **(legacy era)** | OAuth discovery driven by the challenge's `resource_metadata` | [#2071](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2071) |
|
||||
| `oauth-revocation-http.json` / `oauth-no-revocation-http.json` **(legacy era)** | RFC 7009 token revocation on clear, with and without a `revocation_endpoint` | [#2144](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2144) |
|
||||
| `oauth-rfc8414-at-oidc-path-http.json` **(legacy era)** | Plain OAuth 2.0 AS metadata served at the OIDC well-known path | [#2172](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2172) |
|
||||
| `oauth-insecure-token-endpoint-http.json` **(legacy era)** | A token endpoint the SDK refuses to post credentials to (SEP-2207) | [#2280](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2280) |
|
||||
| `oauth-insecure-token-endpoint-http.json` **(legacy era)** | A token endpoint the SDK refuses to post credentials to | [#2280](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2280) |
|
||||
| `logging-{legacy,modern}-http.json` **(era per file)** | Logging, both eras | [#1629](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/1629) |
|
||||
| `subscriptions-{legacy,modern}-http.json` **(era per file)** | Resource subscriptions, both eras | [#1630](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/1630) |
|
||||
| `subscriptions-never-acknowledged-http.json` **(modern era)** | A `subscriptions/listen` answered with a bare result | [#2097](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2097) |
|
||||
|
|
@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ The same server is worth running against `--cli` / `--tui`, which reach it by a
|
|||
|
||||
The value now rides the normalized `AuthChallenge` as a string — it has to be serializable, because the web client's challenge crosses the remote-backend boundary as JSON — and is converted to a `URL` at the OAuth boundary, where it is handed to `auth()` as `resourceMetadataUrl` and to the CIMD pre-registration probe, which runs *before* `auth()` and would otherwise do its own default-location discovery. A malformed value is ignored rather than surfaced, matching the SDK's own `WWW-Authenticate` parser: discovery falls back to the default locations instead of failing the whole authorization on a bad header. The callback leg needs nothing extra — SDK `auth()` persists the URL in its discovery state, so it survives both the web full-page redirect and the CLI/TUI loopback callback.
|
||||
|
||||
## A token endpoint the SDK will not use (SEP-2207)
|
||||
## A token endpoint the SDK will not use
|
||||
|
||||
`oauth-insecure-token-endpoint-http.json` is an ordinary combined AS + resource server with one thing changed: `oauth.issuerUrl` is `http://localhost.:8091`, so its advertised `token_endpoint` is `http://localhost.:8091/oauth/token`. Plain streamable-HTTP — connect with the **default (legacy)** protocol era.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ The trailing dot is the whole trick, and it is doing real work rather than being
|
|||
|
||||
Add the server, click **Connect**, and complete the authorization. The redirect comes back with a code, the Inspector goes to exchange it, and the SDK refuses.
|
||||
|
||||
What you should see is a red, non-expiring **"Token endpoint is not secure"** notification naming the endpoint and the two things that resolve it — serve it over HTTPS, or move it to one of the three host spellings the SDK exempts (`localhost`, `127.0.0.1`, `::1`). It stays until you close it (`autoClose: false` stops it expiring on a timer; Mantine's own close control still dismisses it, which is what you want for a message you have finished reading). There is deliberately **no** action button.
|
||||
What you should see is a red, non-expiring **"Token endpoint is not secure"** notification naming the endpoint and the two things that resolve it — serve it over HTTPS, or move it to one of the three hosts the SDK exempts — `localhost`, `127.0.0.1`, or `[::1]` (bracketed, since a bare IPv6 literal is not a legal URL host). It stays until you close it (`autoClose: false` stops it expiring on a timer; Mantine's own close control still dismisses it, which is what you want for a message you have finished reading). There is deliberately **no** action button.
|
||||
|
||||
Note the second option is phrased as a *spelling* change, not a networking one. `localhost.` already **is** loopback, and so is `tenant.app.localhost`; what they are outside is a three-literal allow-list. Telling a reader to "use a loopback host" when they demonstrably already are is what sends them off to debug their resolver instead of their configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue