fix(auth): address Copilot review on the secret-store PR
Six findings, all taken.
- The descriptor reported the *write policy*, not the file. Adding
`MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_KEY` to an install that already has a plaintext
file flipped `store.encrypted` immediately, so the banner and footer
claimed "File (encrypted)" while the existing secrets sat readable
until the next `set`. `FileSecretStore.readOnDiskEncryption()` now
reads the envelope (never the payload, so it needs no passphrase) and
the descriptor is built from that. The transitional state gets its own
`pendingEncryption` flag, which changes the advice without softening
the verdict — "set a passphrase" is the wrong thing to tell someone who
already has, so the caveat names the pending write instead.
- The secrets file ignored the configured storage directory. A container
mounting only that directory was judged unmounted, fell back to
`memory`, and lost secrets the user had arranged to keep.
`defaultSecretFilePath()` now follows `MCP_STORAGE_DIR` — the variable
that already relocates OAuth tokens and `client.json` — between the
explicit `MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_FILE` and the `~/.mcp-inspector`
default. (The issue comment called it `MCP_INSPECTOR_STORAGE_DIR`; no
such variable exists.)
- `version` was never checked before the plaintext branch, so a
`{ version: 2, encryption: "none" }` file was read and silently
rewritten as version 1, discarding whatever the newer format added —
the same destroy-to-satisfy-an-additive-request case the encrypted
branch already refuses. Checked first now, so the answer no longer
depends on which encryption mode the newer writer chose.
- The doc comment claimed a per-file salt made "a short, memorable value
safe to use". It does not: the salt defeats precomputation, not
guessing, and the scrypt cost is deliberately a few milliseconds
because it runs on every read and write. Both the comment and the
README now say to use a high-entropy value, generated rather than
chosen.
- `usableSecretStorage` validated only `kind`, so a partial
`{ kind: "file" }` was cast through and — because a missing `plaintext`
is falsy — rendered as the quiet, neutral *encrypted* file. That is the
confident half-answer the guard exists to reject, produced by the
absence of information rather than by any claim the backend made.
`reason`, `durable`, and each kind's own required fields are checked.
- The footer's inline `Tooltip` carried four static props; extracted to a
`CaveatTooltip` constant per the `.withProps()` rule.
Tests cover each: the policy/file disagreement in both directions and the
no-file-yet fallback, `MCP_STORAGE_DIR` and its precedence against
`MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_FILE`, the version refusal (asserting the bytes
survive it) split from the unrecognized-cipher refusal it used to be
conflated with, `readOnDiskEncryption` including the keyless and
unparseable cases, five new rejected descriptor shapes, and the changed
caveat. Full `npm run ci` green.
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bc408f5869
commit
3452a63101
2 changed files with 411 additions and 75 deletions
|
|
@ -225,6 +225,31 @@ describe("FileSecretStore failure handling", () => {
|
|||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("refuses a file written by a newer format version", async () => {
|
||||
// Readable as far as the plaintext branch is concerned, which is the trap:
|
||||
// accepting it means the next write rewrites it as version 1 and silently
|
||||
// drops whatever the newer format added. Same refusal the encrypted branch
|
||||
// already gives, so the answer doesn't depend on which mode the newer
|
||||
// writer happened to choose.
|
||||
await fs.writeFile(
|
||||
filePath(),
|
||||
JSON.stringify({
|
||||
version: 2,
|
||||
encryption: "none",
|
||||
secrets: { "a:b": "1" },
|
||||
}),
|
||||
"utf-8",
|
||||
);
|
||||
const store = new FileSecretStore({ filePath: filePath() });
|
||||
expect(await store.get("a", "b")).toBe(null);
|
||||
await expect(store.set("a", "b", "2")).rejects.toThrow(/version 2/);
|
||||
// The bytes are still there — nothing was destroyed to answer the write.
|
||||
const raw = JSON.parse(await fs.readFile(filePath(), "utf-8")) as {
|
||||
version: number;
|
||||
};
|
||||
expect(raw.version).toBe(2);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("delete stays silent on a file it cannot decrypt", async () => {
|
||||
await writeEncryptedFixture();
|
||||
const store = new FileSecretStore({
|
||||
|
|
@ -246,15 +271,34 @@ describe("FileSecretStore failure handling", () => {
|
|||
expect(await store.get("alpha", "env:A")).toBe(null);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("set reports a file written in a format this build doesn't know", async () => {
|
||||
it("set reports a file written by a newer format version", async () => {
|
||||
// The forward-compat case: a newer Inspector's file, opened by an older
|
||||
// one. Refusing beats truncating it to the entries we happen to parse.
|
||||
// The version is checked before the encryption mode, so this is the
|
||||
// message even though the cipher is also unrecognized — the version is
|
||||
// the more actionable of the two ("upgrade"), and it is the reason the
|
||||
// file is unreadable regardless of what the cipher turned out to be.
|
||||
await fs.writeFile(
|
||||
filePath(),
|
||||
JSON.stringify({ version: 99, encryption: "chacha20-poly1305" }),
|
||||
"utf-8",
|
||||
);
|
||||
const store = new FileSecretStore({ filePath: filePath() });
|
||||
await expect(store.set("alpha", "env:A", "1")).rejects.toThrow(
|
||||
/format version 99/,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("set reports an unrecognized cipher at a version it does understand", async () => {
|
||||
// The other half: a file this build's version check accepts, whose
|
||||
// encryption mode it has no code for. A different failure with different
|
||||
// advice, so it must not collapse into the version message.
|
||||
await fs.writeFile(
|
||||
filePath(),
|
||||
JSON.stringify({ version: 1, encryption: "chacha20-poly1305" }),
|
||||
"utf-8",
|
||||
);
|
||||
const store = new FileSecretStore({ filePath: filePath() });
|
||||
await expect(store.set("alpha", "env:A", "1")).rejects.toThrow(
|
||||
/unsupported format/,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
|
@ -409,3 +453,48 @@ describe("tightenSecretFilePermissions", () => {
|
|||
).resolves.toBeUndefined();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe("readOnDiskEncryption", () => {
|
||||
it("reports what the file is, not what the store would write", async () => {
|
||||
// The whole reason it exists: these two disagree for a full session after
|
||||
// a passphrase is added to an install that already has a plaintext file.
|
||||
const plain = new FileSecretStore({ filePath: filePath() });
|
||||
await plain.set("alpha", SECRET_FIELD_OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET, "shh");
|
||||
|
||||
const withKey = new FileSecretStore({
|
||||
filePath: filePath(),
|
||||
passphrase: "hunter2",
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(withKey.encrypted).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(await withKey.readOnDiskEncryption()).toBe("none");
|
||||
|
||||
await withKey.set("alpha", "env:A", "1");
|
||||
expect(await withKey.readOnDiskEncryption()).toBe("aes-256-gcm");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("answers null for an absent, unparseable, or unrecognized file", async () => {
|
||||
const store = new FileSecretStore({ filePath: filePath() });
|
||||
expect(await store.readOnDiskEncryption()).toBe(null);
|
||||
|
||||
await fs.writeFile(filePath(), "{not json", "utf-8");
|
||||
expect(await store.readOnDiskEncryption()).toBe(null);
|
||||
|
||||
await fs.writeFile(
|
||||
filePath(),
|
||||
JSON.stringify({ version: 1, encryption: "rot13" }),
|
||||
"utf-8",
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(await store.readOnDiskEncryption()).toBe(null);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("needs no passphrase — it reads the envelope, never the payload", async () => {
|
||||
// A store whose key is wrong still has to be describable in the UI.
|
||||
const writer = new FileSecretStore({
|
||||
filePath: filePath(),
|
||||
passphrase: "right-key",
|
||||
});
|
||||
await writer.set("alpha", SECRET_FIELD_OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET, "shh");
|
||||
const keyless = new FileSecretStore({ filePath: filePath() });
|
||||
expect(await keyless.readOnDiskEncryption()).toBe("aes-256-gcm");
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ const ENV_KEYS = [
|
|||
"MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_STORE",
|
||||
"MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_FILE",
|
||||
"MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_KEY",
|
||||
"MCP_STORAGE_DIR",
|
||||
"KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST",
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -381,4 +382,86 @@ describe("defaultSecretFilePath", () => {
|
|||
path.join(".mcp-inspector", "secrets.json"),
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("follows MCP_STORAGE_DIR when no explicit file is named", async () => {
|
||||
// The variable that already relocates OAuth tokens and client.json. A
|
||||
// container mounting only that directory must not be judged unmounted and
|
||||
// demoted to `memory` — the user arranged for exactly this directory to
|
||||
// survive.
|
||||
process.env.MCP_STORAGE_DIR = tmpDir;
|
||||
const mod = await loadWithProbe(true);
|
||||
expect(mod.defaultSecretFilePath()).toBe(path.join(tmpDir, "secrets.json"));
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("lets an explicit MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_FILE outrank MCP_STORAGE_DIR", async () => {
|
||||
// Naming the file outright is the more specific statement of the two.
|
||||
process.env.MCP_STORAGE_DIR = tmpDir;
|
||||
process.env.MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_FILE = path.join(tmpDir, "elsewhere.json");
|
||||
const mod = await loadWithProbe(true);
|
||||
expect(mod.defaultSecretFilePath()).toBe(
|
||||
path.join(tmpDir, "elsewhere.json"),
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe("the descriptor reports the file, not the write policy", () => {
|
||||
it("says plaintext while a pre-existing plaintext file is only *going* to be encrypted", async () => {
|
||||
// The transitional state: the passphrase is set, so the next write will
|
||||
// encrypt, but the bytes on disk are still readable. Reporting "File
|
||||
// (encrypted)" here is the one false reassurance this subsystem exists to
|
||||
// avoid.
|
||||
const filePath = path.join(tmpDir, "secrets.json");
|
||||
process.env.MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_FILE = filePath;
|
||||
process.env.MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_STORE = "file";
|
||||
vi.spyOn(console, "warn").mockImplementation(() => {});
|
||||
|
||||
const plain = await loadWithProbe(false);
|
||||
await plain.defaultSecretStore().set("alpha", "env:A", "1");
|
||||
|
||||
// Same file, now with a passphrase configured.
|
||||
process.env.MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_KEY = "hunter2";
|
||||
const withKey = await loadWithProbe(false);
|
||||
const info = await withKey.getSecretStorageInfo();
|
||||
expect(info.plaintext).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(info.pendingEncryption).toBe(true);
|
||||
|
||||
// And the advice changes with it: telling someone to set a passphrase
|
||||
// they have already set is worse than saying nothing.
|
||||
const { secretStorageCaveat, secretStorageLabel } =
|
||||
await import("@inspector/core/auth/secret-storage-info.js");
|
||||
expect(secretStorageLabel(info)).toBe("File (unencrypted)");
|
||||
expect(secretStorageCaveat(info)).toMatch(/next time a secret is saved/);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("says encrypted once the upgrading write has actually landed", async () => {
|
||||
const filePath = path.join(tmpDir, "secrets.json");
|
||||
process.env.MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_FILE = filePath;
|
||||
process.env.MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_STORE = "file";
|
||||
vi.spyOn(console, "warn").mockImplementation(() => {});
|
||||
|
||||
const plain = await loadWithProbe(false);
|
||||
await plain.defaultSecretStore().set("alpha", "env:A", "1");
|
||||
|
||||
process.env.MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_KEY = "hunter2";
|
||||
const withKey = await loadWithProbe(false);
|
||||
await withKey.defaultSecretStore().set("alpha", "env:B", "2");
|
||||
|
||||
const after = await loadWithProbe(false);
|
||||
const info = await after.getSecretStorageInfo();
|
||||
expect(info.plaintext).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(info.pendingEncryption).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("falls back to the write policy when there is no file yet", async () => {
|
||||
// Nothing on disk to describe, and the policy is then accurate: the first
|
||||
// write creates the file in exactly that mode.
|
||||
process.env.MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_FILE = path.join(tmpDir, "absent.json");
|
||||
process.env.MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_STORE = "file";
|
||||
process.env.MCP_INSPECTOR_SECRET_KEY = "hunter2";
|
||||
vi.spyOn(console, "warn").mockImplementation(() => {});
|
||||
const mod = await loadWithProbe(false);
|
||||
const info = await mod.getSecretStorageInfo();
|
||||
expect(info.plaintext).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(info.pendingEncryption).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue