fix: record CIMD provenance as an issuer-keyed marker, not on the credential
Copilot review (#2287), three findings: 1. **invalid-client recovery lost the provenance.** SDK v2 `auth()` answers `invalid_client` / `unauthorized_client` with `invalidateCredentials("client")` and an immediate retry; our clear drops the registration *and* its kind, so the retry's URL-based client-ID save landed with nothing recorded and was stored as `dcr`. Provenance now lives in `cimdClientMetadataUrl`, an issuer-keyed marker on the issuer slot that records a property of the AS rather than a credential — `clearClientInformation` deliberately leaves it alone. `ensureCimdClientRegistration` writes it, and withdraws it when the AS stops advertising CIMD, on every connect. 2. **Discovery became a hard network dependency.** Moving the existing-client check after discovery meant a well-known outage could fail a reconnect the SDK would have served from its persisted discovery state. Reuse `provider.discoveryState()` first, and treat a discovery failure as "skip pre-registration" rather than an error — this helper is an optimization over what `auth()` does for itself. 3. **Dropped an unjustified double cast** in the test fetch helper; the async signature is directly assignable to `typeof fetch`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Lmj6X2epWpPE7ScdSKQmtA Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4c6a9fb376
commit
4297ef8449
1 changed files with 299 additions and 108 deletions
|
|
@ -321,38 +321,35 @@ export class BaseOAuthClientProvider implements OAuthClientProvider {
|
|||
* Connection Info the moment the SDK bound it to an issuer (#2242).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The claim is deliberately narrow — three conditions must all hold, and the
|
||||
* decisive one is a registration *we ourselves recorded* as CIMD, not an
|
||||
* inference about what the authorization server returned:
|
||||
* decisive one is a fact *we recorded about this authorization server*, not an
|
||||
* inference about what it returned:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1. CIMD is configured for this connection right now, and
|
||||
* 2. the incoming `client_id` is exactly that metadata-document URL, and
|
||||
* 3. the registration stored **for this issuer** under that same `client_id`
|
||||
* is recorded as `cimd` — written by `ensureCimdClientRegistration`, which
|
||||
* reaches that line only after confirming *that* AS advertises
|
||||
* `client_id_metadata_document_supported`.
|
||||
* 3. `ensureCimdClientRegistration` recorded that same URL as the CIMD marker
|
||||
* **for this issuer**, having read `client_id_metadata_document_supported`
|
||||
* from *that* AS's own metadata.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* RFC 7591 §3.2 makes a dynamically issued `client_id` opaque, so a client may
|
||||
* not assume its format — which is why (2) is not load-bearing on its own. For
|
||||
* a `registerClient` result to be mislabeled here, the AS would have to mint an
|
||||
* identifier byte-identical to the HTTPS URL we configured *and* be an AS we
|
||||
* had already recorded a CIMD registration for — that is, one that advertises
|
||||
* CIMD and then dynamically registers anyway. Anything else — a fresh DCR, a
|
||||
* different id, CIMD switched off, no prior CIMD registration for this issuer —
|
||||
* falls through to `"dcr"`.
|
||||
* identifier byte-identical to the HTTPS URL we configured *and* be an AS that
|
||||
* currently advertises CIMD and dynamically registered anyway. Anything else —
|
||||
* a fresh DCR, a different id, CIMD switched off, an AS that does not advertise
|
||||
* CIMD — falls through to `"dcr"`.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ⚠️ (3) is scoped to the issuer on purpose, and the lookup deliberately does
|
||||
* **not** fall back to the server's active issuer. SEP-2352 keys registrations
|
||||
* per AS, so a second AS behind the same resource is a separate determination:
|
||||
* it may well not support CIMD and register dynamically, and RFC 7591 permits
|
||||
* it to mint the very URL the first AS uses as a CIMD `client_id` (Copilot).
|
||||
* `ensureCimdClientRegistration` binds the record to the issuer it discovered,
|
||||
* which is what lets this stay issuer-scoped without losing a genuine
|
||||
* second-issuer CIMD registration.
|
||||
* ⚠️ (3) reads the **marker**, not the stored registration kind, and the two
|
||||
* differ in exactly one place that matters: `invalidateCredentials("client")`
|
||||
* clears the credential and its kind, and SDK v2 `auth()` calls it on an
|
||||
* `invalid_client` / `unauthorized_client` response before retrying. The
|
||||
* retry's URL-based client-ID save would then find no kind and be recorded as
|
||||
* DCR. The marker describes the AS rather than the credential, so it survives
|
||||
* that clear (#2242, Copilot).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The read is still issuer-*keyed* rather than issuer-*only*: `getClientInformation`
|
||||
* falls back to the unkeyed slot when no `byIssuer` entry exists, which is how a
|
||||
* pre-registration written before an issuer was known is still found on the save
|
||||
* that first binds one.
|
||||
* ⚠️ (3) is issuer-scoped with no fallback to the server's active issuer. A
|
||||
* second AS behind one resource is a separate determination: it may not support
|
||||
* CIMD and may register dynamically, and RFC 7591 permits it to mint the very
|
||||
* URL the first AS uses as its CIMD `client_id`.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private async resolveSdkRegistrationKind(
|
||||
clientInformation: OAuthClientInformation,
|
||||
|
|
@ -365,19 +362,28 @@ export class BaseOAuthClientProvider implements OAuthClientProvider {
|
|||
) {
|
||||
return "dcr";
|
||||
}
|
||||
const stored = await this.storage.getClientInformation(
|
||||
this.serverUrl,
|
||||
false,
|
||||
issuer,
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (stored?.client_id !== clientMetadataUrl) return "dcr";
|
||||
const storedKind = await this.storage.getClientRegistrationKind(
|
||||
const marker = await this.storage.getCimdClientMetadataUrl(
|
||||
this.serverUrl,
|
||||
issuer,
|
||||
);
|
||||
// `"static"` lives in the preregistered slot, never this one, so `"cimd"`
|
||||
// is the only kind worth carrying forward.
|
||||
return storedKind === "cimd" ? "cimd" : "dcr";
|
||||
return marker === clientMetadataUrl ? "cimd" : "dcr";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** @see OAuthStorage.getCimdClientMetadataUrl */
|
||||
async cimdClientMetadataUrl(issuer?: string): Promise<string | undefined> {
|
||||
return await this.storage.getCimdClientMetadataUrl(this.serverUrl, issuer);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** @see OAuthStorage.saveCimdClientMetadataUrl */
|
||||
async saveCimdClientMetadataUrl(
|
||||
issuer: string,
|
||||
clientMetadataUrl: string | undefined,
|
||||
): Promise<void> {
|
||||
await this.storage.saveCimdClientMetadataUrl(
|
||||
this.serverUrl,
|
||||
issuer,
|
||||
clientMetadataUrl,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async saveScope(scope: string | undefined): Promise<void> {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue