docs: correct the dependency-classification claims
Copilot review round 2, four findings, all factual errors in the docs added by the previous commit: - `yaml` is in the root `dependencies`, not `devDependencies`, and its only importer is `test-servers/src/load-config.ts` — not `core/` or the root tooling, as the `vitest.shared.mts` comment claimed. - The rule as written told a reader to put anything reached through root-owned code — `core/` included — in `devDependencies`. That is wrong and would break the published package silently: the client builds externalize npm packages, so a published install resolves them from the root manifest, where devDependencies are absent. Placement (which manifest) and classification (which section) are now stated as separate questions, the second following from who consumes the package at runtime. `yaml`'s runtime classification is left alone and called out instead: moving it changes what ships, which is not a docs change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HDdo1rNRVQnVRRdsqSrvG3
This commit is contained in:
parent
e132d551e6
commit
5a3a3436ea
1 changed files with 20 additions and 13 deletions
|
|
@ -117,7 +117,13 @@ After installing, `npm run build` builds all clients. The launcher scripts (`npm
|
|||
|
||||
**The MCP SDK packages — `@modelcontextprotocol/client`, `core`, `server`, `server-legacy`, `ext-apps` — are declared in the repo-root `package.json` and nowhere else.** Do not add them to a `clients/*/package.json`: Node resolution walks up, so the root install already serves every client, and a per-client declaration installs a *second copy* that drifts from the root's. That drift is not theoretical — it put two versions of `ext-apps` (1.7.4 / 1.7.5), and of the transitive v1 `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk` (1.29.0 / 1.30.0), in the tree at once (#1970), and a second copy of `client`/`core` is exactly the failure the `dedupe` + `server.deps.inline` workaround in `vitest.shared.mts` exists for.
|
||||
|
||||
The same rule covers anything reached only through **root-owned code that has no manifest of its own**: `express` (imported by `test-servers/src`) and `yaml` are root devDependencies, and `vitest.shared.mts` aliases both to the **repo root** rather than to `<client>/node_modules` like its other pins. If you add a dependency to `test-servers/src` or `core/`, declare it at the root and alias it there too.
|
||||
The same **placement** rule covers anything reached only through **root-owned code that has no manifest of its own** (`test-servers/src`, `core/`): declare it at the root, and alias it to the **repo root** in `vitest.shared.mts` rather than to `<client>/node_modules` like that file's other pins. `express` and `yaml` are the two today — both reached through `test-servers/src` (express by the http/oauth servers, yaml by `load-config.ts`).
|
||||
|
||||
**Placement and classification are separate questions.** Which *section* of the root manifest it goes in follows from who consumes it at runtime:
|
||||
|
||||
- A package `core/` imports at runtime belongs in root **`dependencies`**. The client builds bundle `core/` but externalize npm packages, so a published install resolves them from the root manifest — and devDependencies are not installed for consumers, so a runtime import parked there breaks the published package while passing every local check.
|
||||
- A package only the tests, the test servers, or the build tooling need belongs in **`devDependencies`** — `express`, added there by #1970.
|
||||
- `yaml` is in `dependencies` today even though its only importer is `test-servers/src/load-config.ts`. Left as-is deliberately (moving it changes what ships, which is not a docs change); if you touch it, confirm no published path reads YAML first.
|
||||
|
||||
The v1 SDK (`@modelcontextprotocol/sdk`) is **not** a dependency of this repo and must not become one — v2 uses the packages above. It appears in the lock files only as a `"peer": true` entry pulled in by `ext-apps`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue