Merge branch 'v2/main' into v2/chore/2003-pack-verify-app-render

This commit is contained in:
Cliff Hall 2026-08-24 08:45:35 -04:00 • committed by GitHub
commit 5e43263b09
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
2 changed files with 44 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -67,6 +67,29 @@ describe("approveCspSources", () => {
warn.mockRestore();
});
it("names the offending field and states the expected shape, without calling the value unsafe", () => {
// #2064: the filter screens for injection safety only, so the message must
// not read as a verdict on the value. These four fields are origin lists,
// so the real cause is almost always "not an origin" — a CSP keyword has
// no field in the contract to be requested through. Naming the key also
// tells an app declaring several lists which one the bad entry was in.
const warn = vi.spyOn(console, "warn").mockImplementation(() => {});
approveCspSources({
connectDomains: ["'unsafe-eval'"],
frameDomains: ["<script>"],
});
const messages = warn.mock.calls.map(([message]) => String(message));
expect(messages).toHaveLength(2);
expect(messages[0]).toContain('"connectDomains"');
expect(messages[1]).toContain('"frameDomains"');
for (const message of messages) {
expect(message).toContain("expected an origin");
expect(message).not.toContain("unsafe");
}
expect(warn.mock.calls[0]?.[1]).toBe("'unsafe-eval'");
warn.mockRestore();
});
it("omits a key when every entry is rejected", () => {
const warn = vi.spyOn(console, "warn").mockImplementation(() => {});
expect(approveCspSources({ connectDomains: ['"; x'] })).toEqual({});

View file

@ -41,11 +41,15 @@ const CSP_KEYS = exhaustiveCspKeys([
/**
* Filter an app-supplied {@link McpUiResourceCsp} down to the entries the host
* will actually enforce. Unsafe values are dropped (and warned), and the
* resulting object contains only keys with at least one accepted source. The
* return value is what the host echoes back to the view via
* `hostCapabilities.sandbox.csp` so the app sees what was granted, not what it
* asked for.
* will actually enforce. The accepted subset is the origin forms
* {@link SAFE_CSP_SOURCE} matches — `scheme://host[:port][/path]`, a bare or
* wildcard host, a scheme such as `data:`, and `*`. Anything outside it is
* dropped (and warned) — including a CSP keyword like `'unsafe-eval'`, which
* is a perfectly valid source expression in CSP but not something these
* origin-list fields can express. The resulting object contains only keys with
* at least one accepted source, and is what the host echoes back to the view
* via `hostCapabilities.sandbox.csp` so the app sees what was granted, not what
* it asked for.
*
* NOTE: this screens each source for *injection safety* only — it does NOT
* bound the *breadth* of a grant. A bare `*` (and a scheme-wildcard host) is a
@ -56,6 +60,12 @@ const CSP_KEYS = exhaustiveCspKeys([
* ambient credentials and nothing to exfiltrate beyond what the app already
* received; "approved" therefore means "cannot break out of the meta
* attribute," not "restrictive."
*
* The drop warning is worded accordingly: it names the field the entry came
* from and states the shape expected, and makes no claim about the *safety* of
* the value. Saying "unsafe" instead read as a security verdict this check
* never makes, and sent #2012 chasing an XSS regression that wasn't one, when
* the entry had merely been the wrong kind of thing for the field (#2064).
*/
export function approveCspSources(
csp: McpUiResourceCsp | undefined,
@ -70,7 +80,12 @@ export function approveCspSources(
if (typeof entry === "string" && SAFE_CSP_SOURCE.test(entry)) {
accepted.push(entry);
} else {
console.warn("[mcp-app sandbox] dropping unsafe CSP source:", entry);
console.warn(
`[mcp-app sandbox] dropping "${key}" entry (expected an origin such ` +
`as https://example.com or https://*.example.com, a scheme such as ` +
`data:, or *):`,
entry,
);
}
}
if (accepted.length > 0) approved[key] = accepted;