Merge branch 'v2/main' into v2/fix/2064-csp-drop-warning
This commit is contained in:
commit
684bde5ba5
2 changed files with 191 additions and 10 deletions
|
|
@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ import { describe, it, expect, vi } from "vitest";
|
|||
import {
|
||||
buildOAuthConnectionState,
|
||||
hasPersistedOAuthServerState,
|
||||
isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired,
|
||||
isAccessTokenUsable,
|
||||
isServerOAuthConfigured,
|
||||
protocolFromOAuthConfig,
|
||||
} from "@inspector/core/auth/connection-state.js";
|
||||
|
|
@ -257,3 +259,102 @@ describe("buildOAuthConnectionState", () => {
|
|||
expect(state.ema).not.toHaveProperty("idToken");
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
/** Minimal unsigned JWT carrying only `exp` (epoch seconds). */
|
||||
function jwtWithExp(expSec: number): string {
|
||||
const payload = btoa(JSON.stringify({ exp: expSec }))
|
||||
.replace(/\+/g, "-")
|
||||
.replace(/\//g, "_")
|
||||
.replace(/=+$/, "");
|
||||
return `header.${payload}.sig`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const nowSec = () => Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000);
|
||||
|
||||
describe("isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired", () => {
|
||||
it("is true for a JWT whose exp is in the future", () => {
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired({
|
||||
access_token: jwtWithExp(nowSec() + 3600),
|
||||
token_type: "Bearer",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("is false for a JWT whose exp has passed", () => {
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired({
|
||||
access_token: jwtWithExp(nowSec() - 60),
|
||||
token_type: "Bearer",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("is false inside the 60s expiry skew window", () => {
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired({
|
||||
access_token: jwtWithExp(nowSec() + 30),
|
||||
token_type: "Bearer",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("is false for an opaque token, where isAccessTokenUsable is true", () => {
|
||||
// The #2051 regression: no local expiry evidence must not read as "valid".
|
||||
const tokens = { access_token: "opaque-tok", token_type: "Bearer" };
|
||||
expect(isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired(tokens)).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(isAccessTokenUsable(tokens)).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("is false for a JWT carrying no exp claim", () => {
|
||||
const payload = btoa(JSON.stringify({ sub: "user" }))
|
||||
.replace(/\+/g, "-")
|
||||
.replace(/\//g, "_")
|
||||
.replace(/=+$/, "");
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired({
|
||||
access_token: `header.${payload}.sig`,
|
||||
token_type: "Bearer",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("is false for a two-segment token whose payload decodes to an exp", () => {
|
||||
// jwtExpiresAtMs only requires two dot-separated segments, so a structured
|
||||
// opaque token carrying a decodable `{"exp":...}` would otherwise read as
|
||||
// proof of validity. isJwtFormat is what rejects it.
|
||||
const payload = btoa(JSON.stringify({ exp: nowSec() + 3600 }))
|
||||
.replace(/\+/g, "-")
|
||||
.replace(/\//g, "_")
|
||||
.replace(/=+$/, "");
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired({
|
||||
access_token: `opaque.${payload}`,
|
||||
token_type: "Bearer",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("is false for a four-segment token carrying a decodable exp", () => {
|
||||
const payload = btoa(JSON.stringify({ exp: nowSec() + 3600 }))
|
||||
.replace(/\+/g, "-")
|
||||
.replace(/\//g, "_")
|
||||
.replace(/=+$/, "");
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired({
|
||||
access_token: `header.${payload}.sig.extra`,
|
||||
token_type: "Bearer",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("is false when there is no access token", () => {
|
||||
expect(isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired(undefined)).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
isAccessTokenProvablyUnexpired({
|
||||
access_token: "",
|
||||
token_type: "Bearer",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,6 +27,15 @@ const mockedMcpAuth = vi.mocked(mcpAuth);
|
|||
|
||||
const SERVER_URL = "https://example.com/mcp";
|
||||
|
||||
/** Minimal unsigned JWT carrying only `exp` (epoch seconds). */
|
||||
function jwtWithExp(expSec: number): string {
|
||||
const payload = btoa(JSON.stringify({ exp: expSec }))
|
||||
.replace(/\+/g, "-")
|
||||
.replace(/\//g, "_")
|
||||
.replace(/=+$/, "");
|
||||
return `header.${payload}.sig`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function createMockParams(
|
||||
overrides?: Partial<OAuthManagerParams>,
|
||||
): OAuthManagerParams {
|
||||
|
|
@ -988,10 +997,10 @@ describe("OAuthManager", () => {
|
|||
).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("returns true for token_expired when a usable access token exists", async () => {
|
||||
it("returns true for token_expired when a provably unexpired JWT exists", async () => {
|
||||
const params = createMockParams();
|
||||
storageOf(params).getTokens.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
access_token: "tok",
|
||||
access_token: jwtWithExp(Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 3600),
|
||||
token_type: "Bearer",
|
||||
});
|
||||
const manager = new OAuthManager(params);
|
||||
|
|
@ -1001,6 +1010,36 @@ describe("OAuthManager", () => {
|
|||
).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("returns false for token_expired when the stored JWT has expired", async () => {
|
||||
const params = createMockParams();
|
||||
storageOf(params).getTokens.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
access_token: jwtWithExp(Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) - 60),
|
||||
token_type: "Bearer",
|
||||
});
|
||||
const manager = new OAuthManager(params);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
await manager.checkAuthChallengeSatisfied({ reason: "token_expired" }),
|
||||
).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("returns false for token_expired when the stored token is opaque", async () => {
|
||||
// Regression guard for #2051: an opaque token has no local expiry
|
||||
// evidence, so it must not outvote the resource server's verdict and
|
||||
// short-circuit re-authorization into replaying a dead credential.
|
||||
const params = createMockParams();
|
||||
storageOf(params).getTokens.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
access_token: "opaque-tok",
|
||||
token_type: "Bearer",
|
||||
expires_in: 900,
|
||||
});
|
||||
const manager = new OAuthManager(params);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
await manager.checkAuthChallengeSatisfied({ reason: "token_expired" }),
|
||||
).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("returns false for invalid_token even when a locally valid token exists", async () => {
|
||||
const params = createMockParams();
|
||||
storageOf(params).getTokens.mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue