fix: count severities correctly, gate remote-ref on $id, order --strict checks

Copilot review round 5.

- The sidebar tooltip applied `hasError` to the TOTAL, so a tool with one
  error and three warnings announced as "4 schema portability errors" —
  a defect the previous round introduced while adding that wording, and
  worse than the vague text it replaced. Both the tooltip and the
  accessible label now carry the breakdown, formatted by a new shared
  `summarizeToolFindings` so the fourth place to phrase a severity count
  cannot drift from the other three.

- Suppress `remote-ref` when the document declares an `$id` anywhere.
  `$id` establishes a base URI, so with a root `$id` of
  `https://example.com/root` the ref `https://example.com/root#/$defs/x`
  resolves to THIS document and needs no fetch — the finding and its
  "inline the referenced schema" remediation would both be wrong.
  Classifying correctly needs full RFC 3986 resolution against nested
  embedded resources, which this module does not do, so it declines
  rather than guessing. A missed finding is the acceptable direction.

- Run the `--strict` validations before every short-circuit return.
  `servers/list`, `servers/show`, `--list-stored-auth` and
  `--print-handoff` all return from `parseArgs` before any connect, so
  the checks further down let `--strict --method servers/list` succeed
  while silently ignoring a tools/list-only flag.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UL9retfvAXRgvi6EWk4SY4
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
This commit is contained in:
cliffhall 2026-08-25 02:54:21 -04:00
commit 68c4abf37a

View file

@ -829,6 +829,27 @@ async function parseArgs(argv?: string[]): Promise<ParseResult> {
}
}
// `--strict` is checked HERE, ahead of every short-circuit return below
// (`--list-stored-auth`, `--print-handoff`, `servers/list`, `servers/show`),
// rather than beside the other method-shaped validations further down. Those
// returns never reach the lint, so a later check would let
// `--strict --method servers/list` succeed while silently ignoring a flag
// documented as tools/list-only — the same "accepted but inert" failure the
// `--app-info` pairing rejection exists to prevent.
if (options.strict) {
if (options.method !== "tools/list") {
throw new Error("--strict requires --method tools/list.");
}
// `tools/list --app-info` returns NDJSON straight from `runMethod` and
// never reaches `emitResult`, where the lint runs. Accepting the pair
// would hand a CI caller a gate that can never fail.
if (options.appInfo) {
throw new Error(
"--strict cannot be combined with --app-info; run tools/list twice, once for each.",
);
}
}
// State-path precedence (getStateFilePath): MCP_INSPECTOR_OAUTH_STATE_PATH →
// <MCP_STORAGE_DIR>/oauth.json → ~/.mcp-inspector/storage/oauth.json — the
// same file the web backend writes, so tokens are shared across surfaces.
@ -1009,20 +1030,9 @@ async function parseArgs(argv?: string[]): Promise<ParseResult> {
);
}
if (options.strict && options.method !== "tools/list") {
throw new Error("--strict requires --method tools/list.");
}
// `tools/list --app-info` takes a different path out of `runMethod` — it
// returns NDJSON that the caller writes directly, never reaching
// `emitResult` where the lint runs. Rejecting the pair is the honest
// outcome: silently accepting it would give a CI caller a `--strict` gate
// that can never fail.
if (options.strict && options.appInfo) {
throw new Error(
"--strict cannot be combined with --app-info; run tools/list twice, once for each.",
);
}
// NOTE: `--strict`'s validations are deliberately NOT here — they run before
// the short-circuit returns further up, so a `servers/*` invocation cannot
// accept the flag and ignore it.
// --tool-args-json passes arguments verbatim with no key=value coercion (so
// `"012"` stays a string and nested objects work without shell escaping).