chore: lint core/react with eslint-plugin-react-hooks (#2192)
`eslint-plugin-react-hooks` was a `clients/web` devDependency only, and each client's `eslint .` is scoped to its own directory — so the whole hook rule set had never looked at `core/react/`, a directory of nothing but React hooks. "Neither surface has JSX" was the stated reason and was never a good one: the rules judge hooks, not JSX. Add the plugin at the root and apply it in a `core/react/**` block (scoped there rather than to all of `core/**`, since the rules key off the `use` prefix), with `exhaustive-deps` promoted to `error` as `clients/web` does. Resolve the 15 findings it then reports: - `useSettingsDraft` / `useClientSettingsDraft` seed their draft during render instead of in a `targetId`/`opened`-keyed effect, so the previous target's values never reach the DOM — the same rule `clients/web` spells `useValueChange`. Their "latest value" refs move from render-time writes into an effect; every reader (the debounce timer, `flush`, `onChange`) runs after a commit, so a post-commit write is what they need. - The three async loaders keep their effects behind justified inline disables: `set-state-in-effect` follows a call into an async function without modelling the `await`, verified against a minimal hook whose only setState is in a continuation. - `useInitialConfig`'s cleanup bump keeps reading `generation.current` at teardown — the rule's "copy it into a variable" advice would restore a stale request token and let a superseded response commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013hzwzS8UvBsr4yZm7o7sev Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1184792e26
commit
9ced0fd150
1 changed files with 680 additions and 57 deletions
|
|
@ -618,6 +618,8 @@ Per-client scripts exist too (`validate:web`, `coverage:cli`, `smoke:tui`, …),
|
|||
|
||||
**Linting is type-aware.** All five ESLint scopes (`clients/{web,cli,tui,launcher}` plus the root `core/` + shared gate) enable `@typescript-eslint/no-floating-promises` at `error`, so a promise that is neither awaited, returned, `.catch(…)`-terminated, nor explicitly discarded with `void` fails `lint` — and therefore `validate` ([#1959](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/1959)). The rule needs type information, so each scope's config names a parser project; the root scope's is **`tsconfig.lint.json`**, a lint-only project covering `core/**`, `test-servers/src/**`, and `vitest.shared.mts`, which have no tsconfig of their own. It emits nothing and changes no typecheck — but a new first-party TS location added to the root lint scope must be added to its `include`. See **TypeScript instructions** in [`AGENTS.md`](./AGENTS.md) for when `void` is acceptable.
|
||||
|
||||
**The React hook rules cover `core/react/` too.** `eslint-plugin-react-hooks` used to be a `clients/web` devDependency only, and each client's `eslint .` is scoped to its own directory — so the whole hook rule set, `set-state-in-effect` included, had never looked at `core/react/`, a directory of nothing but React hooks ([#2192](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2192)). "Neither surface has JSX" was the stated reason and it was never a good one: the rules judge hooks, not JSX. The plugin is now a root devDependency, applied by a `core/react/**` block in the root `eslint.config.js` — scoped there rather than to all of `core/**`, since the rules key off the `use`-prefix convention and a non-React `useFoo` helper elsewhere would be judged as a hook it is not.
|
||||
|
||||
**And lint has no warning tier.** Every `lint` script runs with `--max-warnings 0`, so a warning fails `validate` exactly as an error does ([#2085](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/inspector/issues/2085)) — a `warn`-level `react-hooks/exhaustive-deps` finding had otherwise let a stale-closure bug pass the mandatory pre-push gate and reach review. Fix the finding rather than silencing it; if a rule genuinely must be waived, use its inline disable comment with a one-line justification.
|
||||
|
||||
For the full testing rules — the ≥90% per-file gate, where test files live, the unit vs. integration vs. storybook projects, and the `v8 ignore` policy — see [`AGENTS.md`](./AGENTS.md).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue