Forward RFC 9207 iss to the v2 SDK (fixes OAuth + EMA leg 1)

SDK v2 added RFC 9207 §2.4 authorization-response issuer validation
(`validateAuthorizationResponseIssuer` / `IssuerMismatchError`) as a mix-up
attack defense. It is strict: when AS metadata advertises
`authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported: true` and no `iss` reaches
`exchangeAuthorization`/`auth()`, the exchange throws.

v1.29.0 had no `iss` parameter and no RFC 9207 validation at all, so dropping
the callback `iss` was harmless. The migration swapped in the stricter SDK
without feeding it the new input, breaking the authorization-code exchange
against any RFC 9207 authorization server (Okta/xaa.dev advertise it):

    Issuer mismatch in authorization response (RFC 9207):
    expected "https://idp.xaa.dev", received undefined

Found by smoke-testing EMA against live xaa.dev staging; not caught by CI
because the mock IdP never advertised the parameter, so the SDK took its
lenient path (a missing `iss` is only fatal when advertised).

`iss` was dropped in three places, with the plumbing half-built —
`oauthManager`/`inspectorClient` already accepted `iss`, but nothing supplied
or forwarded it:

- `parseOAuthCallbackParams` never extracted `iss` from the callback query
- `mcpAuth` never forwarded `options.iss` to SDK `auth()` — its own comment
  ("forwarded on v2 upgrade; ignored by v1 SDK auth()") predicted this exact
  gap, so standard OAuth was broken identically, not just EMA
- EMA leg 1 (`completeIdpOidcAuthorization`) never passed `iss` to
  `exchangeAuthorization`

Thread `iss` end to end: callback query -> CallbackParams -> resumeAfterOAuth
-> completeOAuthFlow -> {mcpAuth | EMA leg 1} -> SDK. The Node callback server
and runner carry it for CLI/TUI.

Tests: `ema-mock-servers.ts` now advertises
`authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported: true` so the mock is at least
as strict as real IdPs — with it absent the SDK silently takes the lenient path
and a dropped `iss` goes unnoticed. Flipping it made three existing tests
reproduce the failure. Adds regression coverage for forwarding and for
rejecting a mismatched `iss` before any network call.

Verified end to end against live xaa.dev staging: EMA legs 1-3 (IdP SSO ->
ID-JAG mint -> resource token) now complete and the MCP session initializes.

web 3099, cli 212, tui 274 green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VjMemXZohSR2EndBQYif2b
This commit is contained in:
cliffhall 2026-07-15 20:16:43 -04:00
commit f4fb4b50c9
16 changed files with 125 additions and 17 deletions

View file

@ -983,9 +983,12 @@ describe("App (OAuth flows)", () => {
const r = await mount(oneHttp());
await press(r, ["c"]);
await waitUntil(() => h.cb.opts !== null);
await h.cb.opts!.onCallback({ code: "abc" });
await h.cb.opts!.onCallback({ code: "abc", iss: "https://as.example" });
await tick();
expect(h.clientSpies.completeOAuthFlow).toHaveBeenCalledWith("abc");
expect(h.clientSpies.completeOAuthFlow).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"abc",
"https://as.example",
);
});
it("reports an OAuth callback error during a 401 connect", async () => {

View file

@ -2326,6 +2326,7 @@ function App() {
connectStartRef.current = Date.now();
await client.resumeAfterOAuth(params.code, {
remoteSessionId: resumeSnapshot?.remoteSessionId,
iss: params.iss,
});
} catch (err) {
connectStartRef.current = undefined;

View file

@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ describe("emaFlow", () => {
const tokens = await completeEmaIdpAuthorizationAndMint(
config,
"auth-code",
IDP_ISSUER,
);
expect(tokens.access_token).toBe("resource-access-token");
@ -415,7 +416,7 @@ describe("emaFlow", () => {
await startEmaIdpAuthorization(config);
await expect(
completeEmaIdpAuthorizationAndMint(config, "auth-code"),
completeEmaIdpAuthorizationAndMint(config, "auth-code", IDP_ISSUER),
).rejects.toThrow(/EMA legs 2–3 \(resource token mint\)/);
});
@ -480,7 +481,7 @@ describe("emaFlow", () => {
});
await expect(
completeEmaIdpAuthorizationAndMint(config, "auth-code"),
completeEmaIdpAuthorizationAndMint(config, "auth-code", IDP_ISSUER),
).rejects.toThrow(
"EMA leg 1 (IdP authorization code exchange): leg1-non-error",
);

View file

@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ describe("completeIdpOidcAuthorization", () => {
const result = await completeIdpOidcAuthorization({
idp,
authorizationCode: "auth-code-xyz",
iss: IDP_ISSUER,
redirectUrl: "http://127.0.0.1:3000/oauth/callback",
storage,
fetchFn,
@ -465,6 +466,7 @@ describe("completeIdpOidcAuthorization", () => {
const result = await completeIdpOidcAuthorization({
idp,
authorizationCode: "code",
iss: IDP_ISSUER,
redirectUrl: "http://127.0.0.1:3000/oauth/callback",
storage,
fetchFn,
@ -498,10 +500,67 @@ describe("completeIdpOidcAuthorization", () => {
completeIdpOidcAuthorization({
idp,
authorizationCode: "code",
iss: IDP_ISSUER,
redirectUrl: "http://127.0.0.1:3000/oauth/callback",
storage,
fetchFn,
}),
).rejects.toThrow("IdP token response did not include an ID Token");
});
// Regression: the IdP metadata advertises
// `authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported`, so the SDK enforces
// RFC 9207 §2.4 and rejects the exchange unless the callback `iss` is
// forwarded. Dropping `iss` anywhere between the callback and
// `exchangeAuthorization` breaks EMA leg 1 against every real IdP.
it("forwards the callback iss to the token exchange (RFC 9207)", async () => {
storage = buildStorage();
const idToken = jwtWithExp(Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 3600);
const fetchFn = vi.fn(
async () =>
new Response(
JSON.stringify({
id_token: idToken,
access_token: "at",
token_type: "Bearer",
}),
),
);
await expect(
completeIdpOidcAuthorization({
idp,
authorizationCode: "code",
redirectUrl: "http://127.0.0.1:3000/oauth/callback",
storage,
fetchFn,
}),
).rejects.toThrow(/Issuer mismatch/);
const result = await completeIdpOidcAuthorization({
idp,
authorizationCode: "code",
iss: IDP_ISSUER,
redirectUrl: "http://127.0.0.1:3000/oauth/callback",
storage,
fetchFn,
});
expect(result.idToken).toBe(idToken);
});
it("rejects a callback iss from a different issuer (mix-up defense)", async () => {
storage = buildStorage();
const fetchFn = vi.fn();
await expect(
completeIdpOidcAuthorization({
idp,
authorizationCode: "code",
iss: "https://evil.example.com",
redirectUrl: "http://127.0.0.1:3000/oauth/callback",
storage,
fetchFn,
}),
).rejects.toThrow(/Issuer mismatch/);
expect(fetchFn).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});

View file

@ -56,15 +56,21 @@ function createMockCallbackServer(handlers: {
} as unknown as OAuthCallbackServer;
}
/** Drive the loopback callback the way a browser redirect would. */
const CALLBACK_ISS = "https://as.example";
/**
* Drive the loopback callback the way a browser redirect would, including the
* RFC 9207 `iss` that real authorization servers send.
*/
async function simulateCallback(
handlers: MockCallbackHandlers,
code = "auth-code-123",
iss: string | undefined = CALLBACK_ISS,
): Promise<void> {
if (!handlers.onCallback) {
throw new Error("onCallback not registered");
}
await handlers.onCallback({ code });
await handlers.onCallback({ code, iss });
}
describe("runRunnerInteractiveOAuth", () => {
@ -145,7 +151,10 @@ describe("runRunnerInteractiveOAuth", () => {
});
expect(result).toEqual({ kind: "success" });
expect(client.completeOAuthFlow).toHaveBeenCalledWith("auth-code-123");
expect(client.completeOAuthFlow).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"auth-code-123",
CALLBACK_ISS,
);
expect(redirectUrlProvider.redirectUrl).toBe(
"http://127.0.0.1:6276/oauth/callback",
);
@ -179,7 +188,10 @@ describe("runRunnerInteractiveOAuth", () => {
authorizationUrl,
);
expect(client.authenticate).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(client.completeOAuthFlow).toHaveBeenCalledWith("step-up-code");
expect(client.completeOAuthFlow).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"step-up-code",
CALLBACK_ISS,
);
});
it("returns insufficient_scope when post-step-up check fails", async () => {

View file

@ -1525,11 +1525,12 @@ describe("OAuthManager", () => {
);
expect(outcome.kind).toBe("interactive");
await manager.completeOAuthFlow("auth-code");
await manager.completeOAuthFlow("auth-code", "https://idp.example.com");
expect(mintSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ scope: "mcp tools:read weather:read" }),
"auth-code",
"https://idp.example.com",
);
expect(storageOf(params).saveScope).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
SERVER_URL,

View file

@ -21,7 +21,15 @@ export const EMA_MOCK_IDP_CLIENT_SECRET = "ema-mock-idp-secret";
export const EMA_MOCK_RESOURCE_CLIENT_ID = "ema-mock-resource-client";
export const EMA_MOCK_RESOURCE_CLIENT_SECRET = "ema-mock-resource-secret";
/** Fields required by SDK `OAuthMetadataSchema` for discovery in tests. */
/**
* Fields required by SDK `OAuthMetadataSchema` for discovery in tests.
*
* `authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported` mirrors real-world IdPs
* (e.g. Okta/xaa.dev): once advertised, the SDK enforces RFC 9207 §2.4 and
* rejects a callback whose `iss` is missing. Keep it on so the mock stays at
* least as strict as production servers — with it absent the SDK silently takes
* its lenient path and a dropped `iss` goes unnoticed.
*/
export function minimalOAuthAsMetadata(
baseUrl: string,
authorizationEndpoint = `${baseUrl}/authorize`,
@ -32,6 +40,7 @@ export function minimalOAuthAsMetadata(
token_endpoint: `${baseUrl}/token`,
response_types_supported: ["code"],
token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported: ["client_secret_post"],
authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported: true,
};
}

View file

@ -125,11 +125,13 @@ export async function startEmaIdpAuthorization(
export async function completeEmaIdpAuthorizationAndMint(
config: EmaFlowConfig,
authorizationCode: string,
iss?: string,
): Promise<OAuthTokens> {
try {
await completeIdpOidcAuthorization({
idp: config.idp,
authorizationCode,
iss,
redirectUrl: config.redirectUrl,
storage: config.storage,
fetchFn: config.fetchFn,

View file

@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ export async function startIdpOidcAuthorization(params: {
export async function completeIdpOidcAuthorization(params: {
idp: EnterpriseManagedAuthIdpConfig;
authorizationCode: string;
/**
* RFC 9207 `iss` from the IdP callback. Forwarded to the SDK, which rejects
* the exchange when the IdP metadata advertises
* `authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported` but no `iss` arrives.
*/
iss?: string;
redirectUrl: string;
storage: OAuthStorage;
fetchFn?: typeof fetch;
@ -127,6 +133,7 @@ export async function completeIdpOidcAuthorization(params: {
metadata,
clientInformation,
authorizationCode: params.authorizationCode,
iss: params.iss,
codeVerifier,
redirectUri: params.redirectUrl,
fetchFn: params.fetchFn,

View file

@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ export type McpAuthResult = "AUTHORIZED" | "REDIRECT";
export interface McpAuthOptions {
serverUrl: string | URL;
authorizationCode?: string;
/** RFC 9207 callback `iss` — forwarded on v2 upgrade; ignored by v1 SDK `auth()`. */
/** RFC 9207 callback `iss`, validated by the SDK against the metadata issuer. */
iss?: string;
scope?: string;
resourceMetadataUrl?: URL;
@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ export async function mcpAuth(
return sdkAuth(provider, {
serverUrl: options.serverUrl,
authorizationCode: options.authorizationCode,
iss: options.iss,
scope: options.scope,
resourceMetadataUrl: options.resourceMetadataUrl,
fetchFn: options.fetchFn,

View file

@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ function escapeHtml(s: string): string {
export type OAuthCallbackHandler = (params: {
code: string;
state?: string;
/** RFC 9207 `iss`, when the authorization server sends it. */
iss?: string;
}) => Promise<void>;
export type OAuthErrorHandler = (params: {
@ -181,7 +183,7 @@ export class OAuthCallbackServer {
this.handled = true;
const cb = this.onCallback;
if (cb) {
cb({ code: params.code, state })
cb({ code: params.code, state, iss: params.iss })
.then(() => {
send(200, SUCCESS_HTML);
void this.stop();

View file

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ import type { RunnerOAuthCallbackConfig } from "./runner-oauth-callback.js";
export interface RunnerInteractiveOAuthClient {
authenticate(): Promise<URL | undefined>;
beginInteractiveAuthorization(authorizationUrl: URL): Promise<void>;
completeOAuthFlow(authorizationCode: string): Promise<void>;
completeOAuthFlow(authorizationCode: string, iss?: string): Promise<void>;
checkAuthChallengeSatisfied(challenge: AuthChallenge): Promise<boolean>;
}
@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ export async function runRunnerInteractiveOAuth(
path: options.callbackListen.pathname,
onCallback: async (params) => {
try {
await options.client.completeOAuthFlow(params.code);
await options.client.completeOAuthFlow(params.code, params.iss);
flowResolve();
} catch (err) {
flowReject(err instanceof Error ? err : new Error(String(err)));

View file

@ -105,6 +105,12 @@ export type CallbackParams =
successful: true;
// The authorization code is generated by the authorization server.
code: string;
// RFC 9207 `iss`. Present only when the authorization server includes it.
// Forwarded to the SDK, which validates it against the issuer in the
// validated metadata (RFC 9207 §2.4) to detect mix-up attacks. Servers
// advertising `authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported: true` MUST
// send it, and the SDK rejects the callback when it is missing.
iss?: string;
}
| {
successful: false;

View file

@ -89,7 +89,10 @@ export const parseOAuthCallbackParams = (location: string): CallbackParams => {
const code = params.get("code");
if (code) {
return { successful: true, code };
const iss = params.get("iss");
return iss === null
? { successful: true, code }
: { successful: true, code, iss };
}
const error = params.get("error");

View file

@ -3360,9 +3360,9 @@ export class InspectorClient extends InspectorClientEventTarget {
*/
async resumeAfterOAuth(
authorizationCode: string,
options?: { remoteSessionId?: string },
options?: { remoteSessionId?: string; iss?: string },
): Promise<void> {
await this.completeOAuthFlow(authorizationCode);
await this.completeOAuthFlow(authorizationCode, options?.iss);
const remoteSessionId = options?.remoteSessionId;
const transport = this.baseTransport;

View file

@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ export class OAuthManager {
const tokens = await completeEmaIdpAuthorizationAndMint(
config,
authorizationCode,
iss,
);
const requestedScope = this.pendingAuthorizationScope;
const scopeToPersist = resolvePersistedScopeAfterGrant(