Copilot review round 8 on #2114.
The provider's `scope` getter is not the only request path. Mid-session
`insufficient_scope` recovery builds its union from *raw* storage in
`enrichChallengeWithScopes` and hands it to `mcpAuth` directly, so it
never reads that getter. An `offline_access` inherited from an earlier
grant therefore reappeared during step-up and the SDK re-added
`prompt=consent` with the setting off — the failure this option exists
to prevent, on the one path that bypassed it. The comment claiming the
getter was "the one seam both readers go through" was wrong, and is
corrected to name both.
`handleAuthChallenge` now applies the same filter, gated on the setting
so the default path is untouched. The forced-retry reuses that value,
so filtering once at the computation site covers it.
`scopeForDeclinedRefreshGrant` gains the scopes a challenge requires,
honored exactly like a configured one: stripping a scope the server is
asking for would loop — re-authorize, earn the same challenge, strip it
again.
Three regressions; the inherited-scope one fails when the filter is
reverted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013hzwzS8UvBsr4yZm7o7sev
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
Copilot review round 6 on #2114.
The early return handed back the persisted scope unchanged, so an
`offline_access` the user had just typed into Scopes never reached the
request when storage predated the change — and storage routinely does,
since `createOAuthProvider` preserves a stored scope rather than
reseeding from current settings. The docs promised configured scopes
are honored and the form warned that `offline_access` "is still
requested"; both were false in exactly that state.
Honoring it means adding it, not merely declining to strip it.
Only the token itself is added, not the rest of the configured scope:
unioning unrelated configured tokens into the request is outside what
this setting governs and could push an otherwise-satisfied connection
into a step-up authorization.
Three tests, all verified to fail against the previous behavior.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013hzwzS8UvBsr4yZm7o7sev
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
Copilot review round 5 on #2114 — a hole in last round's fix.
When the persisted scope was `offline_access` alone,
`scopeForDeclinedRefreshGrant` returned undefined.
`OAuthManager.createOAuthProvider` reads that as "nothing stored" and
seeds storage with the configured scope, so the request-only filter
silently overwrote the value it promised to leave alone — and
re-enabling the grant could no longer restore it.
It now falls back to the configured scope, which is both the right
thing to request and inert to that branch. The previous "storage is
never rewritten" test could not see this: it ran at the provider level,
while the seeding branch lives in the manager. The new regression runs
there, and fails when the fallback is removed.
Also corrects the EMA rationale, which was wrong even though its
conclusion held. `createOAuthProviderForTransport` does build a
`BaseOAuthClientProvider` and wrap it, and `EmaTransportOAuthProvider`
forwards `clientMetadata` — so the setting is not bypassed outright.
What it cannot change is the IdP authorization leg's fixed
`openid offline_access`, which is the leg the user signs in through and
therefore the reason the control cannot affect EMA's consent behavior.
Fixed in the docs, the code comment, the UI string and the test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013hzwzS8UvBsr4yZm7o7sev
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
Copilot review round 4 on #2114 — a real gap, not a wording one.
Declining the grant stops the SDK *adding* `offline_access`, but the
Inspector's own storage puts it back. A successful default-on
authorization persists the scope the AS granted
(`resolvePersistedScopeAfterGrant`), `offline_access` included;
`prepareForAuth` reloads it and `authenticate` hands it to the SDK as
`scope`, which sees the token in scope and appends `prompt=consent`
again. So any server that had authorized once could uncheck the box and
still hit AADSTS90094 — the users most likely to reach for the setting
were the ones it did not help.
`scopeForDeclinedRefreshGrant` filters it out of the *request* only,
applied in the provider's `scope` getter — the one seam both
`clientMetadata.scope` and `authenticate`'s `scope:` argument read
through. An `offline_access` the user configured is honored; storage is
never rewritten, so re-checking the box restores the old behavior
instead of finding the value destroyed, and scope-satisfaction checks
still see the real grant. Verified by reverting the filter: the new e2e
regression fails.
Also from that round, both previously suppressed:
The checkbox looked effective under enterprise-managed authorization,
which never builds this provider at all — it authorizes against the
enterprise IdP with a fixed `openid offline_access`
(`ema/constants.ts:16`). It now annotates itself the way the endpoint
overrides do. The existing count assertion covered two such notices and
was named for the overrides alone; it is renamed and expects three, with
a dedicated case pinning the notice to this control so the count cannot
be met by three copies elsewhere.
And "obtains no new refresh token" was another overstatement — the AS
decides issuance, and a preconfigured client is reused with whatever its
registration already permits. Replaced with what the setting actually
controls.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013hzwzS8UvBsr4yZm7o7sev
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
Close#1527 acceptance gaps with automated tests (SEP-2468 iss, SEP-2207 offline_access, SEP-2351 discovery shapes, SEP-2352 AS-migration, EraNegotiationFailed→401 unwrap); lean EMA leg 2 and scope helpers on the v2 SDK; drop deprecated TS baseUrl. Reviewed LGTM.
