A floated promise is invisible at review time — the call reads like an
awaited one minus four characters — and the unhandled rejection it
produces surfaces in a different test, in a different file, as a stack
pointing at SDK internals. In #1947 two un-held `callTool` calls made
`npm run ci` unpassable and took a full investigation to attribute; the
fix was two lines. `@typescript-eslint/no-floating-promises` catches the
class outright, so enable it at `error` everywhere.
The rule is type-aware and `tseslint.configs.recommended` is not, so each
scope's config gains a parser project. The four clients name their own
tsconfig projects (both of them — `src` and `__tests__`/`server` live in
different ones). The root scope has no tsconfig at all, so add
`tsconfig.lint.json`: a lint-only project covering `core/**`,
`test-servers/src/**`, and `vitest.shared.mts`, emitting nothing and
gating nothing. It sets `moduleResolution: bundler` deliberately — under
NodeNext `core/`'s extensionless imports fail to resolve, every import
degrades to `any`, and the rule silently stops seeing promises at all.
Measured surface, and the fixes:
- core (2) — `stream.close()` in two Hono `onAbort` listeners. Hono
invokes subscribers with a bare `subscriber()`, so a promise returned
from the listener is floated one layer up; `closeAbortedStream` owns
the rejection where it can actually be owned.
- tui (5) — `handleDisconnect` had no catch of its own and its only
caller is a key handler that cannot await, so a failing disconnect was
a live unhandled rejection; it now surfaces the message the way
`handleConnect` does. The rest are `void` at callers that genuinely
cannot await, over callees that already own their failures.
- web (92) — 83 are Storybook `expect(...)`, which is instrumented and
returns a promise, now awaited (`scrollAreaStoryAssertions` is async
for the same reason). Two tests were asserting against a provider call
they never awaited. `open(url)` in both web servers now warns instead
of escaping a synchronous callback.
- cli, launcher — already clean.
Type-aware linting costs time: `clients/web`'s `eslint .` goes from ~8s
to ~19s, inside `validate`. Narrowing the loaded projects is the lever if
that needs reducing later; dropping the rule is not.
Closes#1959
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
The guard restated `primaryShade.light` as a literal 7, so re-pinning the
theme's primary shade would have made it fail even with the preview
annotations correctly applied — a guard that has to be edited alongside a
legitimate theme change just trains people to edit it.
Derive the shade from `theme.primaryShade`, handling both of Mantine's
forms (a bare number and `{ light, dark }`) and falling back to Mantine's
own default of 6 when a theme pins none.
Verified by temporarily re-pinning the theme to `{ light: 8, dark: 8 }`:
the guard still passes, where the hard-coded 7 would have failed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0119LaPQ3v4NyBK3ZTdM9j84
Since Storybook 10.3, @storybook/addon-vitest provisions the preview
annotations itself — and *skips* doing so when it finds a setup file
calling setProjectAnnotations. So .storybook/vitest.setup.ts was not
merely redundant, it was actively opting the project out of the
automatic path, which the addon printed a notice about on every run.
Remove the file and the `setupFiles` entry from the `storybook` vitest
project.
A green suite doesn't prove the automatic provisioning works: without
the preview annotations, stories would render outside MantineProvider
and without App.css, and would very likely still pass. Add
src/test/PreviewAnnotations.stories.tsx, which asserts from a play
function that the Mantine theme variables and the App.css tokens are
actually present in the rendered document, so an unthemed render fails
loudly. Verified by emptying `decorators` in preview.tsx and confirming
the story goes red.
The a11y addon's axe runner can't be introspected from a play function,
so it was checked out-of-band: a story with a real violation turned the
suite red with the setup file already removed, confirming
@storybook/addon-a11y/preview is applied automatically.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0119LaPQ3v4NyBK3ZTdM9j84
