All nine findings taken.
Two budgets I had lowered are restored as named exceptions rather than folded
into the shared value. cli's e2e child timer goes back to 15s and the two tests
that spawn it get E2E_SPAWN_MS = 25s, so the bound carrying the diagnostic still
wins without taking load tolerance off the one suite that spawns a real process.
App.test.tsx's three-modal sequence keeps THREE_MODAL_SEQUENCE_MS = 20s — a
value chosen against an observed failure, which the shared ceiling would have
replaced with a general one.
Three real false-positive paths in the guard are closed. It now discovers every
Vitest config under clients/ and fails on one it is not configured to check —
without which "a project with no row is an error" was vacuous, since an
undiscovered config yields no project to reject. It strips comments before
looking for configure() and requires the exact expected value, so neither a
commented-out call nor asyncUtilTimeout: 1 passes. And it compares each
resolved project's setupFiles against the site it claims to configure, so
deleting a setupFiles entry can no longer leave both projects reported as
configured while Testing Library silently reverts to 1000ms. Each has a test,
and the setupFiles check was observed to fire against a real deletion.
Three stale comments the change had invalidated: main.yml still counted four
durable guards, PreviewAnnotations.stories.tsx still said the storybook project
had no setupFiles, and the new AGENTS.md rule read as though no Group F row had
been settled when this PR settles F6. browser-timeouts.test.mjs gains the
purpose header this repo's files carry.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PsmUAZ6aLUAFqenjJKSSRp
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
A floated promise is invisible at review time — the call reads like an
awaited one minus four characters — and the unhandled rejection it
produces surfaces in a different test, in a different file, as a stack
pointing at SDK internals. In #1947 two un-held `callTool` calls made
`npm run ci` unpassable and took a full investigation to attribute; the
fix was two lines. `@typescript-eslint/no-floating-promises` catches the
class outright, so enable it at `error` everywhere.
The rule is type-aware and `tseslint.configs.recommended` is not, so each
scope's config gains a parser project. The four clients name their own
tsconfig projects (both of them — `src` and `__tests__`/`server` live in
different ones). The root scope has no tsconfig at all, so add
`tsconfig.lint.json`: a lint-only project covering `core/**`,
`test-servers/src/**`, and `vitest.shared.mts`, emitting nothing and
gating nothing. It sets `moduleResolution: bundler` deliberately — under
NodeNext `core/`'s extensionless imports fail to resolve, every import
degrades to `any`, and the rule silently stops seeing promises at all.
Measured surface, and the fixes:
- core (2) — `stream.close()` in two Hono `onAbort` listeners. Hono
invokes subscribers with a bare `subscriber()`, so a promise returned
from the listener is floated one layer up; `closeAbortedStream` owns
the rejection where it can actually be owned.
- tui (5) — `handleDisconnect` had no catch of its own and its only
caller is a key handler that cannot await, so a failing disconnect was
a live unhandled rejection; it now surfaces the message the way
`handleConnect` does. The rest are `void` at callers that genuinely
cannot await, over callees that already own their failures.
- web (92) — 83 are Storybook `expect(...)`, which is instrumented and
returns a promise, now awaited (`scrollAreaStoryAssertions` is async
for the same reason). Two tests were asserting against a provider call
they never awaited. `open(url)` in both web servers now warns instead
of escaping a synchronous callback.
- cli, launcher — already clean.
Type-aware linting costs time: `clients/web`'s `eslint .` goes from ~8s
to ~19s, inside `validate`. Narrowing the loaded projects is the lever if
that needs reducing later; dropping the rule is not.
Closes#1959
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
The guard restated `primaryShade.light` as a literal 7, so re-pinning the
theme's primary shade would have made it fail even with the preview
annotations correctly applied — a guard that has to be edited alongside a
legitimate theme change just trains people to edit it.
Derive the shade from `theme.primaryShade`, handling both of Mantine's
forms (a bare number and `{ light, dark }`) and falling back to Mantine's
own default of 6 when a theme pins none.
Verified by temporarily re-pinning the theme to `{ light: 8, dark: 8 }`:
the guard still passes, where the hard-coded 7 would have failed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0119LaPQ3v4NyBK3ZTdM9j84
Since Storybook 10.3, @storybook/addon-vitest provisions the preview
annotations itself — and *skips* doing so when it finds a setup file
calling setProjectAnnotations. So .storybook/vitest.setup.ts was not
merely redundant, it was actively opting the project out of the
automatic path, which the addon printed a notice about on every run.
Remove the file and the `setupFiles` entry from the `storybook` vitest
project.
A green suite doesn't prove the automatic provisioning works: without
the preview annotations, stories would render outside MantineProvider
and without App.css, and would very likely still pass. Add
src/test/PreviewAnnotations.stories.tsx, which asserts from a play
function that the Mantine theme variables and the App.css tokens are
actually present in the rendered document, so an unthemed render fails
loudly. Verified by emptying `decorators` in preview.tsx and confirming
the story goes red.
The a11y addon's axe runner can't be introspected from a play function,
so it was checked out-of-band: a story with a real violation turned the
suite red with the setup file already removed, confirming
@storybook/addon-a11y/preview is applied automatically.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0119LaPQ3v4NyBK3ZTdM9j84
