| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
07cafeedbc
When an authorization server returns an `id_token` alongside the access token, the Inspector already persisted it and never showed it. Wire it through to Connection Info as a viewer. - Generalize `OAuthAccessTokenField` into `OAuthTokenField` (label + token), so the ID Token row reuses the existing copy control and "Decode JWT" toggle rather than duplicating them. Access-token behavior is unchanged. - `oauthDetailsFromConnectionState` now surfaces `tokens.id_token` as `idToken`, omitted entirely when absent so no empty row renders. - Docs: update the two `specification/` references to the renamed field. This is deliberately a viewer, not a flow: no OIDC login mode, no signature verification, and the `id_token` is never treated as a credential. The EMA path is untouched. `id_token` is already in `maskSecrets`' `JSON_SENSITIVE_KEYS`, so it stays masked in the Network tab — no gap. Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com> |
||
| .. | ||
| diagrams | ||
| screenshots | ||
| README.md | ||
| v1_problems.md | ||
| v2_auth.md | ||
| v2_auth_ema.md | ||
| v2_auth_hardening.md | ||
| v2_auth_mid_session.md | ||
| v2_auth_sdk_consolidation.md | ||
| v2_auth_smoke_testing.md | ||
| v2_catalog_launch_config.md | ||
| v2_cli_tui_launcher.md | ||
| v2_new_spec_impact.md | ||
| v2_scope.md | ||
| v2_screenshots.md | ||
| v2_server.md | ||
| v2_servers_file.md | ||
| v2_storage.md | ||
| v2_ux.md | ||
| v2_ux_components.md | ||
| v2_ux_features.md | ||
| v2_ux_handlers.md | ||
| v2_ux_interfaces.md | ||
| v2_ux_interfaces_phase_0_4_inventory.md | ||
| v2_ux_interfaces_plan.md | ||
| v2_ux_storybook.md | ||
| v2_web_client.md | ||
Inspector V2 Brief
Brief | V1 Problems | V2 Scope | V2 Tech Stack | V2 UX | V2 Auth | V2 New Spec Impact
Table of Contents
- Motivation and Context
- Track Protocol Conformance
- Improve Maintainability
- Provide Extensibility
- Proper Documentation
Motivation and Context
The existing Inspector is hard to maintain for a number of reasons. We decided to create a more maintainable Inspector from the ground up, that retains the deterministic boundary of operation, but exposes a plugin architecture.
Track Protocol Conformance
- Identify any gaps in V1 inspector
- Track which features are covered
- Implement to parity and fill gaps
- Provide conformance testing in CI
Improve Maintainability
- Clearer separation of concerns
- Smaller, reusable components
Provide Extensibility
- Plugin SDK / API
- Third parties cand develop/maintain their own plugins for features such as
- LLM usage
- Evals
- Multiple server connections
- Apps playground
- Testing of registry configuration
- Interface with registry
Proper Documentation
- One big README won't cut it anymore
- Published documentation in MDX should
- Render in style of spec
- Kept up to date
- Cover all features
- Discuss troubleshooting strategies
- Provide detailed contribution guidance that explains architecture and expected idioms