| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
0c52172379
One inline and three of the four suppressed. Two of the four are cases where
an earlier fix of mine was applied to one branch and not its twin.
**The footer went stale after the write that changed it.** `useInitialConfig`
fetched once, and `secretStorage` is the one field it carries that describes
state *this app mutates*: the first save under a newly-set passphrase
re-encrypts a pre-existing plaintext file. The backend re-derives the
descriptor per request — deliberately, and there is a test for that — but the
client had no way to ask again, so the footer said "Plaintext file" for the
rest of the session about a file that no longer was. Exactly the misreport
this band exists to prevent, arrived at from the client side.
The hook now exposes `refresh()`, and both persist paths that can carry a
secret call it: server settings (OAuth client secret, stdio `env:` values)
and client settings (the enterprise IdP client secret). The refresh tracks
its own liveness through a ref, since unlike the mount fetch it has no effect
teardown to cancel against.
**The plaintext branch skipped the payload validation the encrypted branch
does.** Round 12 tightened the encrypted envelope check and left this one
behind, so `{ "encryption": "none", "secrets": [] }` — trivial to hand-write —
described a healthy plaintext store whose next save `readMap` refuses. Both
branches validate now.
**`secretStoreGetStrict`'s doc contradicted the code it was written for.** It
said falling back to `get` is right "for the in-memory and file stores —
neither can fail in a way that masquerades as absence". `FileSecretStore.get`
does exactly that masquerade, which is why round 9 gave that store its own
`getStrict`. The fallback stays (the seam is optional and doubles must
compile) but the comment no longer claims it is equivalent for a store that
can fail.
**The spec documented the performance bug rather than the fix.** It still said
`getMany` decrypts once per server, which was the shape round 13 replaced —
and describing the earlier bug as the design is worse than saying nothing.
The remaining suppressed comment is the hand-off's TOCTOU delete: the
cross-process guarantee, decided against for this PR and tracked in #2082.
Full `npm run ci` green.
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
|
||
| .. | ||
| diagrams | ||
| screenshots | ||
| README.md | ||
| v1_problems.md | ||
| v2_auth.md | ||
| v2_auth_ema.md | ||
| v2_auth_hardening.md | ||
| v2_auth_mid_session.md | ||
| v2_auth_sdk_consolidation.md | ||
| v2_auth_smoke_testing.md | ||
| v2_catalog_launch_config.md | ||
| v2_cli_tui_launcher.md | ||
| v2_new_spec_impact.md | ||
| v2_scope.md | ||
| v2_screenshots.md | ||
| v2_server.md | ||
| v2_servers_file.md | ||
| v2_storage.md | ||
| v2_ux.md | ||
| v2_ux_components.md | ||
| v2_ux_features.md | ||
| v2_ux_handlers.md | ||
| v2_ux_interfaces.md | ||
| v2_ux_interfaces_phase_0_4_inventory.md | ||
| v2_ux_interfaces_plan.md | ||
| v2_ux_storybook.md | ||
| v2_web_client.md | ||
Inspector V2 Brief
Brief | V1 Problems | V2 Scope | V2 Tech Stack | V2 UX | V2 Auth | V2 New Spec Impact
Table of Contents
- Motivation and Context
- Track Protocol Conformance
- Improve Maintainability
- Provide Extensibility
- Proper Documentation
Motivation and Context
The existing Inspector is hard to maintain for a number of reasons. We decided to create a more maintainable Inspector from the ground up, that retains the deterministic boundary of operation, but exposes a plugin architecture.
Track Protocol Conformance
- Identify any gaps in V1 inspector
- Track which features are covered
- Implement to parity and fill gaps
- Provide conformance testing in CI
Improve Maintainability
- Clearer separation of concerns
- Smaller, reusable components
Provide Extensibility
- Plugin SDK / API
- Third parties cand develop/maintain their own plugins for features such as
- LLM usage
- Evals
- Multiple server connections
- Apps playground
- Testing of registry configuration
- Interface with registry
Proper Documentation
- One big README won't cut it anymore
- Published documentation in MDX should
- Render in style of spec
- Kept up to date
- Cover all features
- Discuss troubleshooting strategies
- Provide detailed contribution guidance that explains architecture and expected idioms