| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
Updates UX specs for better integration of client-initiated features: v2_ux_features.md: - Tools Screen: Inline client request queue during tool execution - History Screen: Hierarchical request trace showing parent-child relationships - Logging Screen: Request correlation with correlation IDs and chain filtering v2_ux_handlers.md: - Sampling Panel: Inline expansion pattern + tool calling flow (2025-11-25 spec) - Elicitation Handler: Inline expansion pattern with schema constraints - Sampling Providers & Testing Profiles: Extensible architecture for response handlers Key design decisions: - Request Trace Model shows causal chains between requests - Client requests appear inline with triggering tool calls - Auto-response profiles enable efficient testing workflows - Extensible provider architecture supports future LLM plugins 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
| .. | ||
| screenshots | ||
| README.md | ||
| v1_problems.md | ||
| v2_scope.md | ||
| v2_screenshots.md | ||
| v2_tech_stack.md | ||
| v2_ux.md | ||
| v2_ux_features.md | ||
| v2_ux_handlers.md | ||
Inspector V2 Brief
Brief | V1 Problems | V2 Scope | V2 Tech Stack
UX: Overview | Features | Handlers | Screenshots
Table of Contents
- Motivation and Context
- Track Protocol Conformance
- Improve Maintainability
- Provide Extensibility
- Proper Documentation
Motivation and Context
The existing Inspector is hard to maintain for a number of reasons. We decided to create a more maintainable Inspector from the ground up, that retains the deterministic boundary of operation, but exposes a plugin architecture.
Track Protocol Conformance
- Identify any gaps in V1 inspector
- Track which features are covered
- Implement to parity and fill gaps
- Provide conformance testing in CI
Improve Maintainability
- Clearer separation of concerns
- Smaller, reusable components
Provide Extensibility
- Plugin SDK / API
- Third parties cand develop/maintain their own plugins for features such as
- LLM usage
- Evals
- Multiple server connections
- Apps playground
- Testing of registry configuration
- Interface with registry
Proper Documentation
- One big README won't cut it anymore
- Published documentation in MDX should
- Render in style of spec
- Kept up to date
- Cover all features
- Discuss troubleshooting strategies
- Provide detailed contribution guidance that explains architecture and expected idioms