Both web test-setup comments explained the 1000ms pin by saying the
tests that let a Testing Library wait expire "are the real defect and
are #2335; revisit when they are gone." #2335 found there are no such
tests, and its interleaved three-arm re-run showed a raise to 5000 is a
no-op on the passing path. The comments now record that finding and
keep the pin on the measured ground: raising buys nothing, so the value
stays until a measurement says otherwise.
Comment-only; the pin and the runtime assertion are unchanged.
Closes#2347
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PsmUAZ6aLUAFqenjJKSSRp
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
4e19598d6b