inspector/core/json/schemaLint.ts
cliffhall 182c48f296 fix: stop claiming a bare-true replacement narrows the contract
Copilot review round 8 (its one suppressed finding; no new inline comments).

The `boolean-schema` suggestion for a bare `true` said the replacement
"narrows the schema deliberately". That holds in an ordinary property
position and inverts under a negating parent: `{"not": true}` rejects
every value, so swapping in `{"type": "object", …}` leaves the parent
rejecting only objects and every non-object then passes — the enclosing
contract is widened. Under `if` it redirects which branch applies rather
than tightening anything.

- Parent-aware advice under `not`: suggest `{}`, which is the exact
  object form of `true` and is already exempt from `untyped-schema` in
  that position, with the message saying why a concrete type would be
  wrong there.
- Everywhere else, and in the `untyped-schema` suggestion too, describe
  the replacement as a deliberate CHANGE of contract rather than a
  narrowing. A suggestion has no business claiming an effect it cannot
  guarantee across the positions it can print from.

Tests pin the `not`-specific advice and assert no bare-`true` suggestion
in any of the three positions contains "narrow". The CLI README's sample
report is re-captured from a real run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UL9retfvAXRgvi6EWk4SY4
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
2026-08-25 03:41:17 -04:00

664 lines
24 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* Tool-schema portability lint (#1005).
*
* A tool's `inputSchema`/`outputSchema` can be a perfectly legal JSON Schema
* and still be rejected outright by the client the server is actually meant to
* run against. The reported case is Go's `jsonschema` package emitting a bare
* `true` for an `interface{}` field: valid Draft 2020-12, accepted by the MCP
* SDK's own parser, and refused by Claude Code with a bare `"Invalid input"`
* pointing at `["tools", 7, "outputSchema", "properties", "data"]`. The
* Inspector is where a server author looks *first*, so a construct that will
* fail downstream should be named here rather than silently passed through.
*
* This is deliberately **not** a JSON Schema validator, for a measured reason:
* a census of 617 public servers (14,804 tool schemas) reported on the issue
* found **0** that fail the SDK's own `ListToolsResultSchema.safeParse` — so a
* conformance check would report nothing on essentially every real server.
* What bites instead is the narrower subset each consumer accepts, which is
* what the rules below encode. Every rule is a construct that is legal JSON
* Schema and is known to be refused or quietly mishandled by real MCP clients.
*
* Kept pure and dependency-free so all three clients share one verdict: the
* CLI's `--strict` report, the TUI's tool detail pane, and the web Tools tab
* must not disagree about whether a schema is portable.
*/
import type { Tool } from "@modelcontextprotocol/client";
/** Which of a tool's two schemas a finding was raised against. */
export type SchemaKind = "inputSchema" | "outputSchema";
/**
* `error` — the construct is refused by at least one shipping MCP client, so
* the tool is unusable there. `warning` — accepted unevenly, or degraded
* (silently coerced, ignored) rather than rejected.
*/
export type SchemaLintSeverity = "error" | "warning";
/** Stable identifier for a lint rule, so a caller can filter or suppress. */
export type SchemaLintRule =
| "boolean-schema"
| "type-union"
| "untyped-schema"
| "remote-ref";
/** One problem found at one location in one schema. */
export interface SchemaFinding {
rule: SchemaLintRule;
severity: SchemaLintSeverity;
/** Which schema the finding is in. */
schema: SchemaKind;
/**
* Location within that schema, in the dotted/bracketed form the report
* prints — `properties.data`, `anyOf[1].items`. Empty string means the
* schema root.
*/
path: string;
/** What is wrong, phrased for a server author. */
issue: string;
/** A concrete replacement, not a restatement of the problem. */
suggestion: string;
}
/** Every finding raised against one tool, in walk order. */
export interface ToolSchemaFindings {
toolName: string;
findings: SchemaFinding[];
}
/**
* Keywords whose value is a schema *or* a boolean by design. `true`/`false`
* here is the idiomatic spelling ("allow anything else" / "allow nothing
* else") and every client understands it, so the boolean-schema rule must not
* fire on them — the issue's own suggested fix is `additionalProperties: true`.
*/
const BOOLEAN_VALUED_KEYWORDS: ReadonlySet<string> = new Set([
"additionalProperties",
"unevaluatedProperties",
"additionalItems",
"unevaluatedItems",
]);
/** Keywords whose value is a single subschema. */
const SUBSCHEMA_KEYWORDS = [
"items",
"contains",
"not",
"propertyNames",
"if",
"then",
"else",
"additionalProperties",
"unevaluatedProperties",
"additionalItems",
"unevaluatedItems",
// 2019-09/2020-12: the schema the *decoded* string content must satisfy.
// A real schema position, so a bare `true` or a remote `$ref` under it is a
// real finding.
"contentSchema",
] as const;
/** Keywords whose value is an array of subschemas. */
const SUBSCHEMA_ARRAY_KEYWORDS = [
"allOf",
"anyOf",
"oneOf",
"prefixItems",
] as const;
/**
* Keywords whose value is a name → subschema map.
*
* `dependencies` is the pre-2019 form and may hold either a subschema or an
* array of property names; the array case is not a schema position, and the
* walk skips it because a non-object, non-boolean node is not a schema.
*/
const SUBSCHEMA_MAP_KEYWORDS = [
"properties",
"patternProperties",
"dependentSchemas",
"dependencies",
"$defs",
"definitions",
] as const;
/**
* Keywords that actually constrain the instance being validated — the
* assertion and applicator vocabularies, plus reference keywords.
*
* This is an **allowlist**, and that direction is load-bearing. JSON Schema
* ignores keywords it does not recognize, so a schema is unconstrained unless
* something it carries is known to constrain: a denylist of known-annotation
* keywords would let `{"vendorHint": true}` — which accepts every value —
* pass as constrained simply because the keyword is unfamiliar.
*
* Two categories are deliberately absent. **Annotations** (`title`,
* `description`, `default`, `examples`, `deprecated`, `readOnly`,
* `writeOnly`, `$comment`) assert nothing. So do the **definition-only
* containers** `$defs` / `definitions` and the identifier keywords `$id`,
* `$schema`, `$anchor`, `$vocabulary`: they hold or name subschemas for
* *other* schemas to reference, and constrain the current instance not at all.
*
* One category is admitted despite being annotation-only in 2020-12's default
* vocabulary: `format`, and the three content keywords (`contentMediaType`,
* `contentEncoding`, `contentSchema`). A schema declaring any of them is
* plainly an attempt to constrain, and reporting it as accepting anything
* would be noise rather than a finding an author can act on.
*
* Defining the rule this way, rather than as "has no `type`", is also
* deliberate: `{"properties": {…}}` with no `type` does constrain its input,
* so calling it unconstrained would be false. The rule fires on `{}`, on
* annotation-only schemas, and on `$defs`-only schemas — the object-literal
* spellings of the same "any" that a bare `true` expresses.
*/
const CONSTRAINING_KEYWORDS: ReadonlySet<string> = new Set([
// Assertions
"type",
"enum",
"const",
"multipleOf",
"maximum",
"exclusiveMaximum",
"minimum",
"exclusiveMinimum",
"maxLength",
"minLength",
"pattern",
"format",
"contentMediaType",
"contentEncoding",
"contentSchema",
"maxItems",
"minItems",
"uniqueItems",
"maxContains",
"minContains",
"maxProperties",
"minProperties",
"required",
"dependentRequired",
// Applicators
"allOf",
"anyOf",
"oneOf",
"not",
// `if` / `then` / `else` are deliberately absent — they only constrain as a
// PAIR. `if` alone has no assertion effect, and `then` / `else` are ignored
// without it, so `{"if": {"const": 1}}` accepts every value. The pairing is
// checked separately in `constrainsInstance`.
"items",
"prefixItems",
"contains",
"additionalItems",
"unevaluatedItems",
"properties",
"patternProperties",
"additionalProperties",
"unevaluatedProperties",
"propertyNames",
"dependentSchemas",
"dependencies",
// References
"$ref",
"$dynamicRef",
"$recursiveRef",
]);
/**
* The seven type names JSON Schema recognizes. A `type` naming anything else
* is malformed rather than unportable, which this module deliberately does not
* report — see {@link isPortableTypeUnion}.
*/
const JSON_SCHEMA_TYPES: ReadonlySet<string> = new Set([
"null",
"boolean",
"object",
"array",
"number",
"string",
"integer",
]);
/**
* Does this schema constrain the instance at all?
*
* Presence of a {@link CONSTRAINING_KEYWORDS} member, plus the one keyword
* group that cannot be judged by presence alone: `if` asserts nothing without
* a `then` or an `else`, and either of those is ignored without an `if`. So
* `{"if": {"const": 1}}` and `{"then": {"type": "string"}}` both accept every
* value, and counting the keyword's mere presence would let them pass as
* constrained.
*/
function constrainsInstance(node: SchemaRecord): boolean {
if (Object.keys(node).some((key) => CONSTRAINING_KEYWORDS.has(key))) {
return true;
}
return "if" in node && ("then" in node || "else" in node);
}
/**
* Is an array-valued `type` the *legal* union this rule is about?
*
* The rule reports a construct that is valid JSON Schema and unportable, and
* its message says exactly that — so it must not fire on an array that is
* simply malformed (`[]`, which matches nothing; `[3]`; `["bananas"]`;
* `["string", "string"]`). Saying "this is legal JSON Schema, but…" of those
* would be false, and the `anyOf` replacement it suggests would be invalid
* too. Malformed schemas are the SDK parser's business, the same way a
* non-object, non-boolean node is; this module stays quiet on them.
*/
function isPortableTypeUnion(type: readonly unknown[]): type is string[] {
if (type.length === 0) return false;
if (!type.every((t) => typeof t === "string" && JSON_SCHEMA_TYPES.has(t))) {
return false;
}
return new Set(type).size === type.length;
}
/**
* Depth cap for the walk. A `$ref`-free JSON document cannot be cyclic, but
* this module is handed whatever a server sent, so bound the recursion rather
* than trusting it.
*/
const MAX_DEPTH = 64;
type SchemaRecord = Record<string, unknown>;
function isRecord(value: unknown): value is SchemaRecord {
return typeof value === "object" && value !== null && !Array.isArray(value);
}
/**
* Append a key to a path, quoting it when it is not a bare identifier so the
* printed path stays unambiguous for an odd property name.
*/
function childPath(parent: string, key: string): string {
if (/^[A-Za-z_$][A-Za-z0-9_$]*$/.test(key)) {
return parent === "" ? key : `${parent}.${key}`;
}
return `${parent}[${JSON.stringify(key)}]`;
}
function indexPath(parent: string, index: number): string {
return `${parent}[${index}]`;
}
/** Human label for a path, so the root reads as something rather than blank. */
export function describeSchemaPath(schema: SchemaKind, path: string): string {
return path === "" ? schema : `${schema}.${path}`;
}
interface WalkContext {
schema: SchemaKind;
findings: SchemaFinding[];
/**
* Whether this schema document declares an `$id` anywhere — see
* {@link declaresAnyId}. Suppresses the `remote-ref` rule.
*/
hasEmbeddedIds: boolean;
}
/**
* Does the document declare an `$id` anywhere in it?
*
* `$id` establishes a base URI, which changes what "points outside this
* document" means: with a root `$id: "https://example.com/root"`, the `$ref`
* `"https://example.com/root#/$defs/x"` resolves to *this* document and needs
* no fetch at all. Classifying refs correctly in that case means full RFC 3986
* base-URI resolution against possibly-nested embedded resources, which this
* module does not do — so when any `$id` is present it declines to classify
* rather than risk a wrong finding with wrong remediation on a valid schema.
*
* A missed finding is the acceptable direction here, the same trade the walk
* makes on a malformed `type` array. `$id` is vanishingly rare in a tool
* schema, so this costs almost nothing in practice. If it ever matters, the
* refinement is to resolve each `$ref` against the enclosing base and compare
* with the declared ids — not to drop the guard.
*
* Descends through {@link forEachSubschema} — **subschema positions only**.
* A scan over every object value would also reach instance data, where an
* `$id` key declares nothing: `examples: [{"$id": "payload-field"}]` would
* otherwise switch this rule off for the entire document.
*/
function declaresAnyId(node: unknown, depth = 0): boolean {
if (depth > MAX_DEPTH || !isRecord(node)) return false;
if (typeof node.$id === "string" && node.$id !== "") return true;
let found = false;
forEachSubschema(node, "", (child) => {
if (!found) found = declaresAnyId(child, depth + 1);
});
return found;
}
function add(
ctx: WalkContext,
rule: SchemaLintRule,
severity: SchemaLintSeverity,
path: string,
issue: string,
suggestion: string,
): void {
ctx.findings.push({
rule,
severity,
schema: ctx.schema,
path,
issue,
suggestion,
});
}
/**
* Call `visit` once for every position under `node` that JSON Schema treats as
* a **subschema** — and only those.
*
* The single traversal both {@link walk} and {@link declaresAnyId} run on, so
* the two cannot disagree about what counts as a schema. That matters more
* than the deduplication: an independent scan that descended through *every*
* object value would also reach instance data — `examples: [{"$id": "x"}]`,
* a `default`, a `const` — where `$id` is just a payload key and declares no
* embedded resource. Reading one there would suppress `remote-ref` for the
* whole document.
*/
function forEachSubschema(
node: SchemaRecord,
path: string,
visit: (child: unknown, childPath: string, keyword: string) => void,
): void {
for (const key of SUBSCHEMA_MAP_KEYWORDS) {
const map = node[key];
if (!isRecord(map)) continue;
for (const [name, sub] of Object.entries(map)) {
visit(sub, childPath(childPath(path, key), name), key);
}
}
for (const key of SUBSCHEMA_ARRAY_KEYWORDS) {
const arr = node[key];
if (!Array.isArray(arr)) continue;
arr.forEach((sub, i) => {
visit(sub, indexPath(childPath(path, key), i), key);
});
}
for (const key of SUBSCHEMA_KEYWORDS) {
if (!(key in node)) continue;
const value = node[key];
// Draft-04 tuple form: `items` may be an array of schemas.
if (key === "items" && Array.isArray(value)) {
value.forEach((sub, i) => {
visit(sub, indexPath(childPath(path, key), i), key);
});
continue;
}
visit(value, childPath(path, key), key);
}
}
/**
* What to replace a bare `true` with — which depends on the keyword above it.
*
* `{}` and `true` are the same schema, so `{}` is always the *exact* rewrite.
* It is normally not what to advise, because `{}` is the very shape
* `untyped-schema` flags — hence the usual advice to declare a real type.
*
* Under `not` that reverses. `{"not": true}` rejects every value; swapping in
* `{"type": "object", …}` leaves the parent rejecting only objects, so every
* non-object now passes — the enclosing contract is **widened**, not narrowed.
* `{}` is exempt from `untyped-schema` in that position for the same reason,
* so it is both exact and safe to recommend there.
*
* Everywhere else the replacement is described as a deliberate *change* rather
* than a narrowing: in an ordinary property position it does narrow, but under
* a conditional (`if`) it redirects which branch applies, and a suggestion has
* no business claiming an effect it cannot guarantee.
*/
function booleanTrueSuggestion(keyword: string | undefined): string {
if (keyword === "not") {
return "Use `{}`, the object form of the always-true schema — under `not` that is an exact replacement. (Declaring a concrete type here would instead let every value of another type through.)";
}
return 'Declare what the value actually is — e.g. `{"type": "object", "additionalProperties": true}` for a free-form object. That is a deliberate change of contract, not an equivalent rewrite: `true` accepts any JSON value at all.';
}
/**
* Visit one schema position. `keyword` is the parent keyword this node sits
* under (undefined at the root), which is what decides whether a bare boolean
* is idiomatic here or a portability defect.
*/
function walk(
node: unknown,
path: string,
keyword: string | undefined,
depth: number,
ctx: WalkContext,
): void {
if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) return;
if (typeof node === "boolean") {
if (keyword !== undefined && BOOLEAN_VALUED_KEYWORDS.has(keyword)) return;
add(
ctx,
"boolean-schema",
"error",
path,
`Bare \`${String(node)}\` used where a schema object is expected.`,
node
? booleanTrueSuggestion(keyword)
: // `false` in a property position means the property is FORBIDDEN.
// Deleting the entry is not the same thing: with `additionalProperties`
// absent (default `true`) the property becomes allowed with any value,
// so the suggestion has to preserve the always-false constraint.
'Use the object form of the always-false schema — `{"not": {}}`. (Deleting the entry is a different contract: under the default `additionalProperties` the property would then be allowed with any value, not forbidden.)',
);
return;
}
// Anything that is neither a boolean nor an object is not a schema at all.
// That is malformed rather than merely unportable, and the SDK's own parser
// is the right place to reject it, so this lint stays quiet and stops here.
if (!isRecord(node)) return;
lintNode(node, path, keyword, ctx);
forEachSubschema(node, path, (child, childPathValue, childKeyword) => {
walk(child, childPathValue, childKeyword, depth + 1, ctx);
});
}
/** Rules that apply to a single schema object, ignoring its children. */
function lintNode(
node: SchemaRecord,
path: string,
keyword: string | undefined,
ctx: WalkContext,
): void {
const type = node.type;
if (Array.isArray(type) && isPortableTypeUnion(type)) {
// The suggestion is always `anyOf`, never "drop it from `required`".
// Accepting an explicit JSON `null` and permitting the property to be
// absent are independent: on a required `["null","boolean"]` field,
// un-requiring it would both stop accepting `null` and start accepting
// omission — a different contract, not the same one spelled portably.
// `anyOf` branches each carrying a single `type` are equivalent, and this
// lint treats them as portable.
add(
ctx,
"type-union",
"warning",
path,
`\`type\` is an array (${JSON.stringify(type)}). The array form is legal JSON Schema, but several MCP clients read \`type\` as a single string and either reject the tool or drop the constraint.`,
`Split it into \`anyOf\` branches, each with a single \`type\` — \`{"anyOf": [${type
.map((t) => `{"type": "${t}"}`)
.join(
", ",
)}]}\`. (Making the property optional instead is a different contract: absent is not the same as \`null\`.)`,
);
}
const ref = node.$ref;
if (
typeof ref === "string" &&
ref !== "" &&
!ref.startsWith("#") &&
!ctx.hasEmbeddedIds
) {
add(
ctx,
"remote-ref",
"warning",
path,
`\`$ref\` points outside this document (\`${ref}\`). Clients do not fetch remote schemas, so the constraint is dropped or the tool is rejected.`,
"Inline the referenced schema, or move it into `$defs` and reference it as `#/$defs/<name>`.",
);
}
const constrains = constrainsInstance(node);
// Under `not`, an always-accepting subschema is the idiomatic spelling of
// always-*reject* — `{"not": {}}` is the object form of `false`, and the one
// this module's own `boolean-schema` suggestion recommends. Reporting it as
// "accepts any value" would be the exact opposite of what it does, so the
// rule stops at that position rather than contradicting itself.
if (!constrains && keyword !== "not") {
add(
ctx,
"untyped-schema",
"warning",
path,
"Schema carries no validation keyword at all, so it accepts any value — the object-literal spelling of a bare `true`.",
// "changes", not "narrows": in an ordinary property position it does
// narrow, but under a conditional (`if`) a typed replacement redirects
// which branch applies rather than tightening anything.
'Declare what the value actually is — e.g. `{"type": "object", "additionalProperties": true}` for a free-form object. That is a deliberate change of contract, which is the point: as written it constrains nothing.',
);
}
}
/**
* Lint one of a tool's schemas.
*
* There is deliberately **no root-level "inputSchema must be an object" rule**,
* even though MCP does require that. The SDK's `ToolSchema` types `inputSchema`
* with `type: literal("object")`, so a tool whose input root is anything else
* fails `ListToolsResultSchema.safeParse`; `salvageListItems` then drops it
* before `ManagedToolsState` hands the list to anyone. Verified against a live
* server advertising `inputSchema: {type: "array"}` — `listAllTools()` returns
* an empty array, so no client can ever pass such a tool to this module.
*
* A rule that cannot fire is worse than no rule: it makes the documentation
* claim a check the tool does not perform. The condition is already reported
* through the salvage path's malformed-items surface, which is where a dropped
* tool legitimately belongs.
*/
function lintSchema(
schema: unknown,
kind: SchemaKind,
findings: SchemaFinding[],
): void {
walk(schema, "", undefined, 0, {
schema: kind,
findings,
hasEmbeddedIds: declaresAnyId(schema),
});
}
/**
* Lint both of a tool's schemas. Returns findings in walk order — inputSchema
* first, then outputSchema — so a report reads top-down through the tool.
*/
export function lintToolSchemas(tool: Tool): SchemaFinding[] {
const findings: SchemaFinding[] = [];
if (tool.inputSchema !== undefined) {
lintSchema(tool.inputSchema, "inputSchema", findings);
}
if (tool.outputSchema !== undefined) {
lintSchema(tool.outputSchema, "outputSchema", findings);
}
return findings;
}
/** Lint a tool list, dropping the tools that came back clean. */
export function lintTools(tools: readonly Tool[]): ToolSchemaFindings[] {
const results: ToolSchemaFindings[] = [];
for (const tool of tools) {
const findings = lintToolSchemas(tool);
if (findings.length > 0) results.push({ toolName: tool.name, findings });
}
return results;
}
/** Count findings by severity across a lint result. */
export function countFindings(results: readonly ToolSchemaFindings[]): {
errors: number;
warnings: number;
} {
let errors = 0;
let warnings = 0;
for (const { findings } of results) {
for (const f of findings) {
if (f.severity === "error") errors++;
else warnings++;
}
}
return { errors, warnings };
}
/** `2 errors` / `1 warning` — one pluralized count, used in every surface. */
function plural(count: number, noun: string): string {
return `${count} ${noun}${count === 1 ? "" : "s"}`;
}
/**
* One-line summary of a lint result, shared by the CLI's non-strict hint, the
* TUI's tools header and the web Tools tab so the three cannot disagree.
*/
export function summarizeFindings(
results: readonly ToolSchemaFindings[],
): string {
const { errors, warnings } = countFindings(results);
return `${plural(errors, "error")}, ${plural(warnings, "warning")} across ${plural(results.length, "tool")}`;
}
/**
* Severity breakdown for ONE tool's findings — "1 error, 3 warnings".
*
* Deliberately not "N errors" keyed off the highest severity present: a tool
* with one error and three warnings is four findings, not four errors, and
* labelling the total with the worst severity misreports every mixed result.
* Categories that are empty are omitted, so a warning-only tool reads "3
* warnings" rather than "0 errors, 3 warnings".
*/
export function summarizeToolFindings(
findings: readonly SchemaFinding[],
): string {
const errors = findings.filter((f) => f.severity === "error").length;
const warnings = findings.length - errors;
const parts: string[] = [];
if (errors > 0) parts.push(plural(errors, "error"));
if (warnings > 0) parts.push(plural(warnings, "warning"));
return parts.join(", ");
}
/**
* Render a lint result as plain text — the CLI's `--strict` report, and the
* body the TUI's detail pane prints. Shared so the two cannot describe the
* same finding differently.
*/
export function formatSchemaLintReport(
results: readonly ToolSchemaFindings[],
): string {
const lines: string[] = [];
for (const { toolName, findings } of results) {
for (const f of findings) {
lines.push(
`${f.severity === "error" ? "Error" : "Warning"}: tool "${toolName}"`,
);
lines.push(` Path: ${describeSchemaPath(f.schema, f.path)}`);
lines.push(` Issue: ${f.issue}`);
lines.push(` Suggestion: ${f.suggestion}`);
lines.push("");
}
}
lines.push(`${summarizeFindings(results)}.`);
return lines.join("\n");
}