inspector/.claude
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
cliffhall 6dd43e78ba docs: tune skill eval cases and document how to write them
`skills:eval` was at 38/46 with several skills measuring 0-33%. The low
scores were mostly bad eval cases rather than bad descriptions, for two
reasons that were nowhere written down:

- The harness runs each case with `--max-turns 1`, so the skill has to be
  the model's FIRST tool call. A prompt asking "how does X work here", or
  naming a concrete file, sends the model to Read/Grep first — a better
  answer to the question, scored as a miss. Every 0% case was one of these.
- `AGENTS.md` is resident on every turn, so a prompt it already answers is
  answered without any skill and the case can never pass.

Replace the cases that measured the wrong thing, expand every model-invoked
skill from 3 to 5 positives (negatives kept) so one flake cannot cross the
threshold, and reshape `local-dev`'s description to the action-first form.

Add `docs/skill-authoring.md` with the case shapes that fire, the ones that
cannot, and the probe-then-measure loop.

RUNS=5 npm run skills:eval: 63/63 at or above threshold, 60 at 100%,
all 18 negatives clean.

Closes #2202

Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
2026-08-31 23:22:25 -04:00
..
skills docs: tune skill eval cases and document how to write them 2026-08-31 23:22:25 -04:00
settings.json Add new components, typography, badge contrast, and screen layout refactors 2026-03-28 20:38:04 -04:00