Copilot review round 1.
Refreshes are concurrent — an `oauthComplete` can start a second read while
the first is still in flight — and nothing makes them settle in order. The
new catch made that visible: a slow earlier read could reject *after* a
newer one succeeded and clear the fresh result. Guard both handlers with a
monotonically increasing sequence so only the newest read writes.
The two tests were also too weak to detect their own guards, as the review
pointed out. Both started from an undefined panel, so neither could tell a
correct handler from one that merely swallowed the error:
- The rejection test now seeds a successful read first, then rejects an
`oauthComplete` refresh and asserts the already-loaded details clear.
- The post-cleanup test now reconnects with a replacement client that
populates details, then rejects the stale read, and asserts the current
details survive.
- A third test covers the ordering guard directly.
Each of the three guards has exactly one test that fails without it,
verified by mutation: dropping the sequence check, dropping the clear, and
dropping the `cancelled` check each break one test and no others.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GBkPzbuxgyqiz39ytmQzMB
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
79751383da