Three comments still said transport-internal discovery has no
client-side wrapper, or that the wrapper must never be applied to the
transport fetch. Round 11 made both false, and the second actively
tells a caller to do the opposite of what InspectorClient does — while
hiding that isExempt is the safety-critical part.
- createRemoteFetch's marker comment now gives the real reason the
reconstruction matters: both ends run the same budget, so this path
is the backend winning the race, most plausibly a backgrounded tab
throttling setTimeout while the server's fires on schedule. Which
deadline fired must not decide whether the error names its endpoint.
- The body-buffering comment now says buffering is the second reason
isExempt is not optional on a mixed chain, since an exempt request
skips it and an SSE body stays open rather than being drained.
- The matching test comment is reframed as testing the proxy boundary
independently of which deadline wins.
The PR description is rewritten around what is actually shipped: both
chains bounded and differing only in the exemption, the per-request
envelope that replaced the fetchTimeoutMs option, and the three
mutation-verified tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YFnM6RqB4nXqNysgUYmjmq
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
93965936ba