Re-measured the two committed chain cases under the stricter turn-boundary
scoring from 313a5809: 100% and 33% at RUNS=3, against 33% and 33% before.
That rise is NOT an effect of the change and the doc now says so. The turn
rule only ever rejects matches a flatter reading accepted, so it cannot
raise a score — the two runs simply straddle a 67-point swing on the same
prompt at RUNS=3, where one sample is worth 33 points. Reading it as an
improvement would be exactly the mistake the eval exists to prevent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ABdTnqyBodw6mHVVkGehqe
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
dfbd45993f