Copilot review round 8 (its one suppressed finding; no new inline comments).
The `boolean-schema` suggestion for a bare `true` said the replacement
"narrows the schema deliberately". That holds in an ordinary property
position and inverts under a negating parent: `{"not": true}` rejects
every value, so swapping in `{"type": "object", …}` leaves the parent
rejecting only objects and every non-object then passes — the enclosing
contract is widened. Under `if` it redirects which branch applies rather
than tightening anything.
- Parent-aware advice under `not`: suggest `{}`, which is the exact
object form of `true` and is already exempt from `untyped-schema` in
that position, with the message saying why a concrete type would be
wrong there.
- Everywhere else, and in the `untyped-schema` suggestion too, describe
the replacement as a deliberate CHANGE of contract rather than a
narrowing. A suggestion has no business claiming an effect it cannot
guarantee across the positions it can print from.
Tests pin the `not`-specific advice and assert no bare-`true` suggestion
in any of the three positions contains "narrow". The CLI README's sample
report is re-captured from a real run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UL9retfvAXRgvi6EWk4SY4
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
182c48f296