`parseClaudeVersion` dropped SemVer suffixes, so an installed `2.1.250-beta.1`
parsed as `[2, 1, 250]` and compared EQUAL to the stable pin — a different
validator schema running locally while the log claimed an exact match, which is
the cross-machine disagreement the pin exists to prevent.
It now returns `{ parts, prerelease }`, because the two callers want different
things: `isPinnedVersion` rejects any prerelease (build metadata still matches,
per SemVer precedence), while the eval's availability probe only needs some
usable CLI. `formatClaudeVersion` keeps the suffix in the messages, so a
prerelease is reported as what it is rather than as the pin.
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
358 lines
11 KiB
JavaScript
358 lines
11 KiB
JavaScript
// Table-driven tests for the `.claude/skills` frontmatter contract (#2163),
|
||
// one case per rule the parsers encode. The guard that reads them
|
||
// (`verify-skills.mjs`) walks the real skills directory, so a rule it enforces
|
||
// is only observable there when a skill happens to violate it — which, by
|
||
// construction, none does once the guard is green.
|
||
|
||
import { test } from "node:test";
|
||
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
||
import {
|
||
splitFrontmatter,
|
||
parseSkill,
|
||
validateEvalCases,
|
||
listingCost,
|
||
parseClaudeVersion,
|
||
compareVersions,
|
||
PINNED_CLI_VERSION,
|
||
isPinnedVersion,
|
||
formatClaudeVersion,
|
||
} from "./skill-manifest.mjs";
|
||
|
||
const fm = (body) => `---\n${body}\n---\n\n# Body\n`;
|
||
|
||
test("splitFrontmatter requires the fence on the very first line", () => {
|
||
// This is the whole failure class: anything before the fence and Claude Code
|
||
// treats the WHOLE file, `---` markers included, as body content.
|
||
for (const text of [
|
||
"\n---\nname: x\n---\n",
|
||
"---\nname: x\n---\n",
|
||
"# Title\n---\nname: x\n---\n",
|
||
]) {
|
||
assert.match(splitFrontmatter(text).error ?? "", /first line/);
|
||
}
|
||
assert.equal(splitFrontmatter(fm("name: x")).error, undefined);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("splitFrontmatter requires the closing fence to be a whole line", () => {
|
||
// `---oops` is not a terminator. Accepting it would silently truncate the
|
||
// frontmatter to whatever preceded it and report the file as valid.
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
splitFrontmatter("---\nname: x\n---oops\nbody\n").error ?? "",
|
||
/never closed/,
|
||
);
|
||
// Trailing whitespace on the fence is still a fence, and so is EOF.
|
||
assert.equal(
|
||
splitFrontmatter("---\nname: x\n--- \nbody\n").frontmatter,
|
||
"name: x",
|
||
);
|
||
assert.equal(splitFrontmatter("---\nname: x\n---").frontmatter, "name: x");
|
||
assert.equal(
|
||
splitFrontmatter("---\nname: x\n---\r\nbody").frontmatter,
|
||
"name: x",
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("splitFrontmatter reports an unterminated block", () => {
|
||
assert.match(splitFrontmatter("---\nname: x\n").error ?? "", /never closed/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill accepts a well-formed skill", () => {
|
||
const r = parseSkill(
|
||
"local-dev",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: local-dev\ndescription: Does a thing.\ndisable-model-invocation: false",
|
||
),
|
||
);
|
||
assert.deepEqual(r.errors, []);
|
||
assert.equal(r.modelInvoked, true);
|
||
assert.equal(r.userInvocable, true);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill rejects frontmatter that is not valid YAML", () => {
|
||
// An unquoted colon in a description is enough, and this is exactly what
|
||
// silently strips the description Claude matches against.
|
||
const r = parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: x\ndescription: Use this: always\ndisable-model-invocation: true",
|
||
),
|
||
);
|
||
assert.equal(r.errors.length, 1);
|
||
assert.match(r.errors[0], /not valid YAML/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill requires name to match the directory, kebab-case", () => {
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"board-ops",
|
||
fm("name: boardOps\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: true"),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/does not match its directory/,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"Board_Ops",
|
||
fm("name: Board_Ops\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: true"),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/kebab-case/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill requires a non-empty description", () => {
|
||
for (const d of ["", " "]) {
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(`name: x\ndescription: "${d}"\ndisable-model-invocation: true`),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/description. is required/,
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill caps the description at the listing-entry limit", () => {
|
||
const long = "a".repeat(1537);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(`name: x\ndescription: ${long}\ndisable-model-invocation: true`),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/caps a listing entry/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill requires the invocation mode to be declared", () => {
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill("x", fm("name: x\ndescription: d")).errors.join(),
|
||
/must be declared explicitly/,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm("name: x\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: yes-please"),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/must be a boolean/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill rejects a skill nothing can reach", () => {
|
||
const r = parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: x\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: true\nuser-invocable: false",
|
||
),
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(r.errors.join(), /unreachable/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill validates the paths list", () => {
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: x\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: false\npaths: '**/*.ts'",
|
||
),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/list of glob strings/,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: x\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: false\npaths:\n - '**/*.ts'",
|
||
),
|
||
).paths,
|
||
["**/*.ts"],
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("listingCost counts only the skills that occupy the listing", () => {
|
||
const skills = [
|
||
{ name: "aa", description: "bbb", modelInvoked: true },
|
||
{ name: "cccc", description: "ddddd", modelInvoked: false },
|
||
];
|
||
assert.equal(listingCost(skills), 5);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("validateEvalCases requires a positive and a negative", () => {
|
||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||
validateEvalCases("testing", [
|
||
{ prompt: "a", expect: "testing" },
|
||
{ prompt: "b", expect: null },
|
||
]),
|
||
[],
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
validateEvalCases("testing", [{ prompt: "a", expect: "testing" }]).join(),
|
||
/no negative case/,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
validateEvalCases("testing", [{ prompt: "a", expect: null }]).join(),
|
||
/no positive case/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("validateEvalCases rejects malformed cases", () => {
|
||
assert.match(validateEvalCases("x", []).join(), /non-empty array/);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
validateEvalCases("x", [{ expect: null }]).join(),
|
||
/prompt.*non-empty string/,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
validateEvalCases("x", [{ prompt: "a", expect: 7 }]).join(),
|
||
/expect. must be a skill name or null/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseClaudeVersion reads the CLI's version banner", () => {
|
||
assert.deepEqual(parseClaudeVersion("2.1.250 (Claude Code)"), {
|
||
parts: [2, 1, 250],
|
||
prerelease: null,
|
||
});
|
||
assert.deepEqual(parseClaudeVersion("claude 10.0.4\n"), {
|
||
parts: [10, 0, 4],
|
||
prerelease: null,
|
||
});
|
||
assert.equal(parseClaudeVersion("no version here"), null);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseClaudeVersion keeps a prerelease suffix rather than dropping it", () => {
|
||
// Dropping it made `2.1.250-beta.1` compare EQUAL to the stable pin — a
|
||
// different validator schema running while the log claimed an exact match.
|
||
assert.deepEqual(parseClaudeVersion("2.1.250-beta.1 (Claude Code)"), {
|
||
parts: [2, 1, 250],
|
||
prerelease: "beta.1",
|
||
});
|
||
assert.equal(
|
||
formatClaudeVersion(parseClaudeVersion("2.1.250-beta.1")),
|
||
"2.1.250-beta.1",
|
||
);
|
||
assert.equal(formatClaudeVersion(null), "(unreadable version)");
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("isPinnedVersion accepts only the exact stable pin", () => {
|
||
const pin = PINNED_CLI_VERSION;
|
||
assert.equal(isPinnedVersion(parseClaudeVersion(pin), pin), true);
|
||
// Build metadata is ignored for precedence by SemVer, so it still matches.
|
||
assert.equal(
|
||
isPinnedVersion(parseClaudeVersion(`${pin}+build.7`), pin),
|
||
true,
|
||
);
|
||
// A prerelease of the same triple is NOT the pin.
|
||
assert.equal(
|
||
isPinnedVersion(parseClaudeVersion(`${pin}-beta.1`), pin),
|
||
false,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.equal(isPinnedVersion(parseClaudeVersion("2.1.249"), pin), false);
|
||
assert.equal(isPinnedVersion(parseClaudeVersion("99.0.0"), pin), false);
|
||
assert.equal(isPinnedVersion(null, pin), false);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("the listing-entry cap covers description AND when_to_use together", () => {
|
||
// The cap is over the combined entry, so checking `description` alone would
|
||
// pass an over-cap listing entry.
|
||
const under = fm(
|
||
`name: x\ndescription: ${"a".repeat(1000)}\nwhen_to_use: ${"b".repeat(536)}\ndisable-model-invocation: true`,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.deepEqual(parseSkill("x", under).errors, []);
|
||
|
||
const over = fm(
|
||
`name: x\ndescription: ${"a".repeat(1000)}\nwhen_to_use: ${"b".repeat(537)}\ndisable-model-invocation: true`,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(parseSkill("x", over).errors.join(), /caps a listing entry/);
|
||
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: x\ndescription: d\nwhen_to_use: 7\ndisable-model-invocation: true",
|
||
),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/when_to_use. must be a string/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("listingCost counts when_to_use too", () => {
|
||
assert.equal(
|
||
listingCost([
|
||
{ name: "aa", description: "bbb", whenToUse: "cc", modelInvoked: true },
|
||
]),
|
||
7,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("a CRLF manifest is valid — the fence is still the first line", () => {
|
||
// A Windows checkout with `core.autocrlf` produces these. Rejecting one would
|
||
// fail `npm run validate` on a manifest the authoritative validator accepts,
|
||
// and would fail it *before* that validator ever ran.
|
||
const crlf =
|
||
"---\r\nname: x\r\ndescription: d\r\ndisable-model-invocation: true\r\n---\r\n\r\nBody\r\n";
|
||
assert.equal(
|
||
splitFrontmatter(crlf).frontmatter,
|
||
"name: x\r\ndescription: d\r\ndisable-model-invocation: true",
|
||
);
|
||
assert.deepEqual(parseSkill("x", crlf).errors, []);
|
||
|
||
// Mixed endings are still fine, and so is a CRLF file with no trailing body.
|
||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
"---\r\nname: x\ndescription: d\r\ndisable-model-invocation: true\n---\r\n",
|
||
).errors,
|
||
[],
|
||
);
|
||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
"---\r\nname: x\r\ndescription: d\r\ndisable-model-invocation: true\r\n---",
|
||
).errors,
|
||
[],
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("CRLF does not weaken the first-line rule", () => {
|
||
// The point of the opening check is that anything before the fence turns the
|
||
// whole file into body — accepting CRLF must not start accepting those.
|
||
for (const text of [
|
||
"\r\n---\r\nname: x\r\n---\r\n",
|
||
"---\r\nname: x\r\n---\r\n",
|
||
"# Title\r\n---\r\nname: x\r\n---\r\n",
|
||
"--- \r\nname: x\r\n---\r\n".replace("--- ", "---x"),
|
||
]) {
|
||
assert.match(splitFrontmatter(text).error ?? "", /first line|never closed/);
|
||
}
|
||
// And `---oops` is still not a terminator with CRLF endings either.
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
splitFrontmatter("---\r\nname: x\r\n---oops\r\nbody\r\n").error ?? "",
|
||
/never closed/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("an eval file may only expect its own skill", () => {
|
||
// A foreign name passes whenever that OTHER skill fires, so the file reports
|
||
// a measurement of something it does not describe — and it satisfies the
|
||
// positive-case requirement while doing it, hiding the absence of a real one.
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
validateEvalCases("testing", [
|
||
{ prompt: "a", expect: "local-dev" },
|
||
{ prompt: "b", expect: "testing" },
|
||
{ prompt: "c", expect: null },
|
||
]).join(),
|
||
/expects `local-dev`, but this file only measures `testing`/,
|
||
);
|
||
// The masking case: a foreign positive is no longer enough on its own.
|
||
const masked = validateEvalCases("testing", [
|
||
{ prompt: "a", expect: "local-dev" },
|
||
{ prompt: "b", expect: null },
|
||
]);
|
||
assert.match(masked.join(), /only measures/);
|
||
assert.match(masked.join(), /no positive case/);
|
||
// Null and own-name cases are unaffected.
|
||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||
validateEvalCases("testing", [
|
||
{ prompt: "a", expect: "testing" },
|
||
{ prompt: "b", expect: null },
|
||
]),
|
||
[],
|
||
);
|
||
});
|