- verify-skills: the best-effort `plugin validate` hand-off now also requires the EXACT pinned CLI. `local:gate` runs `validate` before the pinned `verify:skills:cli` step, so a newer local CLI could reject skills that CI's pinned validator accepts — and the gate would exit there, never reaching the reproducible check. One schema everywhere, or none. - Dropped `PLUGIN_VALIDATE_MIN_VERSION`: with both validators on the exact pin it was read only by its own test, and a constant nothing enforces is a claim nothing enforces. Its test now pins what actually matters — that equality is distinguishable from newer as well as older. - The CI step's comment described the old floor behavior. - issue-create: the duplicate check searched only open issues, so a completed or rejected match was invisible to a procedure that says never to duplicate. Searches all states and reports state/stateReason. Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
256 lines
7.8 KiB
JavaScript
256 lines
7.8 KiB
JavaScript
// Table-driven tests for the `.claude/skills` frontmatter contract (#2163),
|
||
// one case per rule the parsers encode. The guard that reads them
|
||
// (`verify-skills.mjs`) walks the real skills directory, so a rule it enforces
|
||
// is only observable there when a skill happens to violate it — which, by
|
||
// construction, none does once the guard is green.
|
||
|
||
import { test } from "node:test";
|
||
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
||
import {
|
||
splitFrontmatter,
|
||
parseSkill,
|
||
validateEvalCases,
|
||
listingCost,
|
||
parseClaudeVersion,
|
||
compareVersions,
|
||
PINNED_CLI_VERSION,
|
||
} from "./skill-manifest.mjs";
|
||
|
||
const fm = (body) => `---\n${body}\n---\n\n# Body\n`;
|
||
|
||
test("splitFrontmatter requires the fence on the very first line", () => {
|
||
// This is the whole failure class: anything before the fence and Claude Code
|
||
// treats the WHOLE file, `---` markers included, as body content.
|
||
for (const text of [
|
||
"\n---\nname: x\n---\n",
|
||
"---\nname: x\n---\n",
|
||
"# Title\n---\nname: x\n---\n",
|
||
]) {
|
||
assert.match(splitFrontmatter(text).error ?? "", /first line/);
|
||
}
|
||
assert.equal(splitFrontmatter(fm("name: x")).error, undefined);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("splitFrontmatter requires the closing fence to be a whole line", () => {
|
||
// `---oops` is not a terminator. Accepting it would silently truncate the
|
||
// frontmatter to whatever preceded it and report the file as valid.
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
splitFrontmatter("---\nname: x\n---oops\nbody\n").error ?? "",
|
||
/never closed/,
|
||
);
|
||
// Trailing whitespace on the fence is still a fence, and so is EOF.
|
||
assert.equal(
|
||
splitFrontmatter("---\nname: x\n--- \nbody\n").frontmatter,
|
||
"name: x",
|
||
);
|
||
assert.equal(splitFrontmatter("---\nname: x\n---").frontmatter, "name: x");
|
||
assert.equal(
|
||
splitFrontmatter("---\nname: x\n---\r\nbody").frontmatter,
|
||
"name: x",
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("splitFrontmatter reports an unterminated block", () => {
|
||
assert.match(splitFrontmatter("---\nname: x\n").error ?? "", /never closed/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill accepts a well-formed skill", () => {
|
||
const r = parseSkill(
|
||
"local-dev",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: local-dev\ndescription: Does a thing.\ndisable-model-invocation: false",
|
||
),
|
||
);
|
||
assert.deepEqual(r.errors, []);
|
||
assert.equal(r.modelInvoked, true);
|
||
assert.equal(r.userInvocable, true);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill rejects frontmatter that is not valid YAML", () => {
|
||
// An unquoted colon in a description is enough, and this is exactly what
|
||
// silently strips the description Claude matches against.
|
||
const r = parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: x\ndescription: Use this: always\ndisable-model-invocation: true",
|
||
),
|
||
);
|
||
assert.equal(r.errors.length, 1);
|
||
assert.match(r.errors[0], /not valid YAML/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill requires name to match the directory, kebab-case", () => {
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"board-ops",
|
||
fm("name: boardOps\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: true"),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/does not match its directory/,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"Board_Ops",
|
||
fm("name: Board_Ops\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: true"),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/kebab-case/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill requires a non-empty description", () => {
|
||
for (const d of ["", " "]) {
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(`name: x\ndescription: "${d}"\ndisable-model-invocation: true`),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/description. is required/,
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill caps the description at the listing-entry limit", () => {
|
||
const long = "a".repeat(1537);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(`name: x\ndescription: ${long}\ndisable-model-invocation: true`),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/caps a listing entry/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill requires the invocation mode to be declared", () => {
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill("x", fm("name: x\ndescription: d")).errors.join(),
|
||
/must be declared explicitly/,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm("name: x\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: yes-please"),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/must be a boolean/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill rejects a skill nothing can reach", () => {
|
||
const r = parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: x\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: true\nuser-invocable: false",
|
||
),
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(r.errors.join(), /unreachable/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseSkill validates the paths list", () => {
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: x\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: false\npaths: '**/*.ts'",
|
||
),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/list of glob strings/,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: x\ndescription: d\ndisable-model-invocation: false\npaths:\n - '**/*.ts'",
|
||
),
|
||
).paths,
|
||
["**/*.ts"],
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("listingCost counts only the skills that occupy the listing", () => {
|
||
const skills = [
|
||
{ name: "aa", description: "bbb", modelInvoked: true },
|
||
{ name: "cccc", description: "ddddd", modelInvoked: false },
|
||
];
|
||
assert.equal(listingCost(skills), 5);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("validateEvalCases requires a positive and a negative", () => {
|
||
assert.deepEqual(
|
||
validateEvalCases("testing", [
|
||
{ prompt: "a", expect: "testing" },
|
||
{ prompt: "b", expect: null },
|
||
]),
|
||
[],
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
validateEvalCases("testing", [{ prompt: "a", expect: "testing" }]).join(),
|
||
/no negative case/,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
validateEvalCases("testing", [{ prompt: "a", expect: null }]).join(),
|
||
/no positive case/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("validateEvalCases rejects malformed cases", () => {
|
||
assert.match(validateEvalCases("x", []).join(), /non-empty array/);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
validateEvalCases("x", [{ expect: null }]).join(),
|
||
/prompt.*non-empty string/,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
validateEvalCases("x", [{ prompt: "a", expect: 7 }]).join(),
|
||
/expect. must be a skill name or null/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("parseClaudeVersion reads the CLI's version banner", () => {
|
||
assert.deepEqual(parseClaudeVersion("2.1.250 (Claude Code)"), [2, 1, 250]);
|
||
assert.deepEqual(parseClaudeVersion("claude 10.0.4\n"), [10, 0, 4]);
|
||
assert.equal(parseClaudeVersion("no version here"), null);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("compareVersions can decide exact equality with the pin", () => {
|
||
// Both validators require the EXACT pinned version, so what matters is that
|
||
// "equal" is distinguishable from newer as well as older — a floor would let a
|
||
// newer local CLI validate against a different schema than CI's.
|
||
const pin = parseClaudeVersion(PINNED_CLI_VERSION);
|
||
assert.equal(compareVersions(pin, pin), 0);
|
||
assert.ok(compareVersions([pin[0], pin[1], pin[2] - 1], pin) < 0);
|
||
assert.ok(compareVersions([pin[0], pin[1], pin[2] + 1], pin) > 0);
|
||
assert.ok(compareVersions([pin[0] + 1, 0, 0], pin) > 0);
|
||
// Shorter and longer triples still order sanely.
|
||
assert.ok(compareVersions([pin[0]], pin) < 0);
|
||
assert.equal(compareVersions([...pin, 0], pin), 0);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("the listing-entry cap covers description AND when_to_use together", () => {
|
||
// The cap is over the combined entry, so checking `description` alone would
|
||
// pass an over-cap listing entry.
|
||
const under = fm(
|
||
`name: x\ndescription: ${"a".repeat(1000)}\nwhen_to_use: ${"b".repeat(536)}\ndisable-model-invocation: true`,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.deepEqual(parseSkill("x", under).errors, []);
|
||
|
||
const over = fm(
|
||
`name: x\ndescription: ${"a".repeat(1000)}\nwhen_to_use: ${"b".repeat(537)}\ndisable-model-invocation: true`,
|
||
);
|
||
assert.match(parseSkill("x", over).errors.join(), /caps a listing entry/);
|
||
|
||
assert.match(
|
||
parseSkill(
|
||
"x",
|
||
fm(
|
||
"name: x\ndescription: d\nwhen_to_use: 7\ndisable-model-invocation: true",
|
||
),
|
||
).errors.join(),
|
||
/when_to_use. must be a string/,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test("listingCost counts when_to_use too", () => {
|
||
assert.equal(
|
||
listingCost([
|
||
{ name: "aa", description: "bbb", whenToUse: "cc", modelInvoked: true },
|
||
]),
|
||
7,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|