Copilot review round 3. Docs only.
The round-2 wording said every surviving copy is pinned by its holder's peer
range, in the same paragraph that documents cli's @types/node 24.13.1 against
the root's 24.13.3 — a transitive, which no peer range constrains. The rationale
contradicted its own example.
Both files now split the two mechanisms and grade them:
- A peer copy is constrained by its holder's peer range, which is a real pin only
when that range is exact. @vitest/browser-playwright pins vitest to a single
version (hence the exact trio). eslint-plugin-react-refresh accepts ^9 || ^10,
so the eslint copies agree only because npm resolves the same latest in both
installs — a coincidence, not a guarantee.
- A transitive copy is constrained by nothing of ours, and cli's @types/node has
already diverged. It was 24.13.1 on v2/main too: a declared ^24.12.4 still
loses to a nearer transitive.
Nothing gates either, and verify:dep-lockstep is not that gate.
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
e76e32caa9