Addresses Copilot's round-5 review on #2035 — eight suppressed comments,
all of them real.
The consequential one overturns behavior I copied from the SDK and
defended in two earlier rounds. RFC 6570 expands each expression
independently; it carries no cross-expression state. The SDK tracks
whether a query expression has already emitted and rewrites a later
`{?two}`'s `?` to `&`. That looks friendlier and is wrong, and its own
matcher says so: for `x{?one}{?two}` it expands to `x?one=1&two=2`, and
`match("x?one=1&two=2")` on that same template returns **null**, while
`match("x?one=1?two=2")` returns both variables. So the rewrite emitted a
URI the advertised template cannot match — #1919 one level up. A server
that wants a continuation advertises `{?one}{&two}`, which expands to `&`
and matches; producing that shape is the server's choice to declare, not
ours to infer.
Also:
- `{id:abc}` was silently treated as `{id}`, and a test codified it. RFC
6570's max-length is `%x31-39 0*3DIGIT`, so `{id:}`, `{id:0}`,
`{id:abc}` and `{id:10000}` are invalid templates rather than templates
with an ignorable modifier — and the SDK's constructor accepts them all,
so nothing else rejects them. Strict expansion now throws; lenient
returns the raw template. Discovery stays lenient so the panel still
renders rather than going blank.
- The TUI could submit `{a,b}` completely blank while the web panel
blocked the same request: ink-form has no way to express "any one of
these", so its members are left optional and the modal needs its own
group check. Added, with tests — it was also below the coverage gate
without them (functions 76.92%).
- Added the integration test the config never had: it resolves the
checked-in config and drives all four reads over a real transport, so a
misspelt preset fails there rather than only when someone runs the repro
by hand.
- "All three clients" was false. The CLI has no template form and its
`resources/read` passes the already-expanded `--uri` straight to
`readResource`, so nothing here runs for it. Corrected in the README,
AGENTS.md, and the module comment, and dropped a docblock still
describing the SDK-delegation path removed last round.
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
ebc18e1d56