Addresses Copilot's round-19 review on #2035 -- a divergence introduced by
my own round-14 guard rather than by the original code.
The SDK validated a value inside `encodeValue`, i.e. only after looking one
up by a DECLARED name. The restored guard checked the caller's whole map, so
an unrelated entry failed a template that never mentions it. Measured on
9caac43d:
tryExpandUriTemplate("x://{id}", { id: "7", stale: "a".repeat(1_000_001) })
=> error: The value for "stale" exceeds the 1000000-character limit
RFC 6570 ignores an extra variable, so this refused a perfectly valid read.
`valueLengthError` now takes the names to consider and both callers pass the
template's declared set.
Copilot's second half is worth taking on its own: strict expansion parsed
the template THREE times -- inside `templateError`, again for the name list,
again to expand -- and the template is server-controlled and may be 1 MB.
It is now parsed once and reused, with validation split into
`sdkTemplateError` (the constructor's unclosed-brace and length/count
limits) and `partsError` (this module's own grammar), so `templateError` and
strict expansion share both halves rather than duplicating either.
npm run ci passes.
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
7bcf155e06