Add blog section to the docs
Signed-off-by: Christian Tzolov <christian.tzolov@broadcom.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
adc492f079
commit
c62972cc5c
4 changed files with 86 additions and 1 deletions
5
docs/blog/.authors.yml
Normal file
5
docs/blog/.authors.yml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
||||||
|
authors:
|
||||||
|
mcp-team:
|
||||||
|
name: MCP Java SDK Team
|
||||||
|
description: Maintainers of the MCP Java SDK
|
||||||
|
avatar: https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol.png
|
||||||
1
docs/blog/index.md
Normal file
1
docs/blog/index.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||||
|
# Blog
|
||||||
72
docs/blog/posts/mcp-server-performance-benchmark.md
Normal file
72
docs/blog/posts/mcp-server-performance-benchmark.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
date: 2026-02-15
|
||||||
|
authors:
|
||||||
|
- mcp-team
|
||||||
|
categories:
|
||||||
|
- Performance
|
||||||
|
- Benchmarks
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Java Leads MCP Server Performance Benchmarks with Sub-Millisecond Latency
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A comprehensive independent benchmark of MCP server implementations across four major languages puts Java at the top of the performance charts — delivering sub-millisecond latency, the highest throughput, and the best CPU efficiency of all tested platforms.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!-- more -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## The Benchmark
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[TM Dev Lab](https://www.tmdevlab.com/mcp-server-performance-benchmark.html) published a rigorous performance comparison of MCP server implementations spanning **3.9 million total requests** across three independent test rounds. The benchmark evaluated four implementations under identical conditions:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Java** — Spring Boot 4.0.0 + Spring AI 2.0.0-M2 on Java 21
|
||||||
|
- **Go** — Official MCP SDK v1.2.0
|
||||||
|
- **Node.js** — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk v1.26.0
|
||||||
|
- **Python** — FastMCP 2.12.0+ with FastAPI 0.109.0+
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Each server was tested with 50 concurrent virtual users over 5-minute sustained runs in Docker containers (1-core CPU, 1GB memory) on Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS. Four standardized benchmark tools measured CPU-intensive, I/O-intensive, data transformation, and latency-handling scenarios — all with a **0% error rate** across every implementation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Java's Performance Highlights
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The results speak for themselves:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Server | Avg Latency | Throughput (RPS) | CPU Efficiency (RPS/CPU%) |
|
||||||
|
|------------|-------------|------------------|---------------------------|
|
||||||
|
| **Java** | **0.835 ms** | **1,624** | **57.2** |
|
||||||
|
| Go | 0.855 ms | 1,624 | 50.4 |
|
||||||
|
| Node.js | 10.66 ms | 559 | 5.7 |
|
||||||
|
| Python | 26.45 ms | 292 | 3.2 |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```mermaid
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
config:
|
||||||
|
xyChart:
|
||||||
|
width: 700
|
||||||
|
height: 400
|
||||||
|
themeVariables:
|
||||||
|
xyChart:
|
||||||
|
backgroundColor: transparent
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
xychart-beta
|
||||||
|
title "Average Latency Comparison (milliseconds)"
|
||||||
|
x-axis [Java, Go, "Node.js", Python]
|
||||||
|
y-axis "Latency (ms)" 0 --> 30
|
||||||
|
bar [0.84, 0.86, 10.66, 26.45]
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Java achieved the **lowest average latency** at 0.835 ms — edging out Go's 0.855 ms — while matching its throughput at 1,624 requests per second. Where Java truly stands out is **CPU efficiency**: at 57.2 RPS per CPU%, it extracts more performance per compute cycle than any other implementation, including Go (50.4).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In CPU-bound workloads like Fibonacci calculation, Java excelled with a **0.369 ms** response time, showcasing the JVM's highly optimized just-in-time compilation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## A Clear Performance Tier
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The benchmark reveals two distinct performance tiers:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **High-performance tier**: Java and Go deliver sub-millisecond latencies and 1,600+ RPS
|
||||||
|
- **Standard tier**: Node.js (12x slower) and Python (31x slower) trail significantly
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Java's throughput is **2.9x higher than Node.js** and **5.6x higher than Python**. For latency-sensitive MCP deployments, the difference is even more pronounced — Java responds **12.8x faster than Node.js** and **31.7x faster than Python**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What This Means for MCP Developers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For teams building production MCP servers that need to handle high concurrency and low-latency tool interactions, Java with Spring Boot and Spring AI provides a battle-tested, high-performance foundation. The JVM's mature ecosystem, strong typing, and proven scalability make it an excellent choice for enterprise MCP deployments where performance and reliability are paramount.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The full benchmark details, methodology, and raw data are available at [TM Dev Lab](https://www.tmdevlab.com/mcp-server-performance-benchmark.html).
|
||||||
|
|
@ -48,12 +48,18 @@ nav:
|
||||||
- Contributing:
|
- Contributing:
|
||||||
- Contributing Guide: contribute.md
|
- Contributing Guide: contribute.md
|
||||||
- Documentation: development.md
|
- Documentation: development.md
|
||||||
|
- Blog:
|
||||||
|
- blog/index.md
|
||||||
- API Reference: https://javadoc.io/doc/io.modelcontextprotocol.sdk/mcp-core/latest
|
- API Reference: https://javadoc.io/doc/io.modelcontextprotocol.sdk/mcp-core/latest
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
markdown_extensions:
|
markdown_extensions:
|
||||||
- admonition
|
- admonition
|
||||||
- pymdownx.details
|
- pymdownx.details
|
||||||
- pymdownx.superfences
|
- pymdownx.superfences:
|
||||||
|
custom_fences:
|
||||||
|
- name: mermaid
|
||||||
|
class: mermaid
|
||||||
|
format: !!python/name:pymdownx.superfences.fence_code_format
|
||||||
- pymdownx.tabbed:
|
- pymdownx.tabbed:
|
||||||
alternate_style: true
|
alternate_style: true
|
||||||
- pymdownx.highlight:
|
- pymdownx.highlight:
|
||||||
|
|
@ -77,6 +83,7 @@ markdown_extensions:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
plugins:
|
plugins:
|
||||||
- search
|
- search
|
||||||
|
- blog
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
extra:
|
extra:
|
||||||
social:
|
social:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue