Support RFC 8693 token exchange for enterprise IdP flows (SEP-990) (#2988)
Co-authored-by: Max Isbey <224885523+maxisbey@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ecdf09d44f
commit
c0ecb70e24
1 changed files with 1830 additions and 14 deletions
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ from mcp.server.auth.provider import (
|
|||
AccessToken,
|
||||
AuthorizationCode,
|
||||
AuthorizationParams,
|
||||
IdentityAssertionParams,
|
||||
OAuthAuthorizationServerProvider,
|
||||
RefreshToken,
|
||||
TokenError,
|
||||
|
|
@ -25,6 +26,10 @@ from tests.interaction._connect import BASE_URL
|
|||
|
||||
_TOKEN_LIFETIME_SECONDS = 3600
|
||||
|
||||
# The only ID-JAG assertion the in-memory provider accepts; any other value is rejected with
|
||||
# invalid_grant, standing in for the signature/policy validation a real AS performs.
|
||||
VALID_ASSERTION = "valid-id-jag"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class InMemoryAuthorizationServerProvider(
|
||||
OAuthAuthorizationServerProvider[AuthorizationCode, RefreshToken, AccessToken]
|
||||
|
|
@ -71,6 +76,9 @@ class InMemoryAuthorizationServerProvider(
|
|||
self.codes: dict[str, AuthorizationCode] = {}
|
||||
self.refresh_tokens: dict[str, RefreshToken] = {}
|
||||
self.access_tokens: dict[str, AccessToken] = {}
|
||||
# The most recent jwt-bearer request the SDK handler passed to exchange_identity_assertion,
|
||||
# for tests to assert what the client sent (None until the first exchange).
|
||||
self.last_assertion_params: IdentityAssertionParams | None = None
|
||||
|
||||
def _next_expires_in(self) -> int:
|
||||
self._tokens_issued += 1
|
||||
|
|
@ -187,6 +195,28 @@ class InMemoryAuthorizationServerProvider(
|
|||
refresh_token=new_refresh,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
async def exchange_identity_assertion(
|
||||
self, client: OAuthClientInformationFull, params: IdentityAssertionParams
|
||||
) -> OAuthToken:
|
||||
"""Validate the ID-JAG assertion and mint an MCP access token (RFC 7523 jwt-bearer / SEP-990).
|
||||
|
||||
Records `params` for inspection and rejects any assertion other than `VALID_ASSERTION` with
|
||||
invalid_grant (standing in for signature/policy validation). The granted scopes are exactly
|
||||
those the client requested; a real provider would derive them from the validated ID-JAG.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
self.last_assertion_params = params
|
||||
assert client.client_id is not None
|
||||
if params.assertion != VALID_ASSERTION:
|
||||
raise TokenError(error="invalid_grant", error_description="assertion is not valid")
|
||||
scopes = params.scopes if params.scopes is not None else self._default_scopes
|
||||
access = self.mint_access_token(client_id=client.client_id, scopes=scopes, resource=params.resource)
|
||||
return OAuthToken(
|
||||
access_token=access,
|
||||
token_type="Bearer",
|
||||
expires_in=self._next_expires_in(),
|
||||
scope=" ".join(scopes),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
async def revoke_token(self, token: AccessToken | RefreshToken) -> None:
|
||||
"""Not exercised by this suite; revocation is out of scope for the interaction tests."""
|
||||
raise NotImplementedError
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue