Say "structured content", not "structured output"
The spec never uses the phrase "structured output". It defines two separate things under Tool Result: "Structured Content" (the `structuredContent` field) and "Output Schema" (the `outputSchema` field). Collapsing them into "structured output" conflates the two. It is also actively confusing here. In LLM tooling "structured output" means constrained decoding — making the *model* emit conforming JSON. These clients call a model API, so a reader could reasonably take the phrase to mean the tool constrains the model's response, which is the opposite of what is going on: the tool describes the shape of its own result. Headings and prose now say "structured content". References to real identifiers are left alone: the Python SDK's own docs page is called Structured Output and lives at docs/servers/structured-output.md, and its decorator parameter is `structured_output`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b8b3289475
commit
f24bf97412
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
See the [Build an MCP client](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/develop/build-client) tutorial for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
## Structured output
|
||||
## Structured content
|
||||
|
||||
The spec says clients SHOULD validate structured results against the schema the tool declares, and this SDK's client does not do it for you — `MCP::Client::Tool#output_schema` hands back the raw schema from the wire and nothing checks results against it. So the client compiles each declared schema once at connect time with `MCP::Tool::OutputSchema.new` and validates every non-error result.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue