quickstart-resources/mcp-client-typescript
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
Ola Hungerford 43927228cc
Add structured content to the TypeScript weather server and client and update to v2 (#165)
* Add structured output to the TypeScript weather server and client

Both tools declare an outputSchema and return structuredContent alongside the
text.

get-alerts declares z.array(...), so it answers with a top-level JSON array
rather than an array nested in an object, which protocol revision 2026-07-28
is the first to allow. "No alerts" is simply []. get-forecast returns an
object, for contrast.

This costs older clients nothing. The server declares the array schema once
and never branches on protocol version: serveStdio serves both eras from one
factory, and the SDK projects the schema down to
{"type":"object","properties":{"result":...}} for a 2025-11-25 client, wrapping
the structured content to match. Verified against both eras.

Error paths throw: a tool declaring an outputSchema MUST return conforming
structured content, so a path with no data has to fail.

The client passes versionNegotiation {mode:"auto"}; the SDK default is
"legacy". The SDK validates every result against the declared schema, so the
client-side SHOULD needs no code. Each channel goes to its stated reader:
content is forwarded to the model, structuredContent is used as data,
reporting how many items came back.

Moves to the 2.0 beta packages, where the 2026-07-28 support lives:
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk is replaced by @modelcontextprotocol/server and
@modelcontextprotocol/client. Model identifier moves to claude-sonnet-5.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Update to @modelcontextprotocol/{server,client} 2.0.0

The 2.0 packages left beta on 2026-07-27, so the dependency ranges move off
2.0.0-beta.5.

Also from review: engines.node goes to 20, which is what the 2.0 packages
require, and the client README no longer implies every structured result is
counted — only array-rooted ones are.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Query the active-alerts endpoint in the TypeScript server

get-alerts asked for /alerts?area=XX, which returns every alert NWS has on
file for the state including expired ones. The Python, Go and Rust servers
all ask for /alerts/active/area/XX.

Measured against the live API for TX: 372 alerts before, 8 after, and the
tools/call response drops from roughly 270KB to 5KB. The other four servers
return the same 8.

Pre-existing on main rather than introduced by the structured-output work,
but it is the one thing that stopped the examples being comparable.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Match the shared alert and forecast shapes in the TypeScript server

get-alerts published status and headline where Python, Go, Rust and Ruby all
publish description and instructions, and get-forecast periods used the NWS
camelCase spelling with shortForecast instead of detailed_forecast. The
divergence predates this round, but declaring an outputSchema turns it from a
difference in prose formatting into a difference in the published contract,
which defeats the point of a five-language example.

All five now advertise:
  get_alerts   -> [{event, area, severity, description, instructions}]
  get_forecast -> {latitude, longitude, periods[{name, temperature,
                   temperature_unit, wind_speed, wind_direction,
                   detailed_forecast}]}

Also limits the forecast to the next 5 periods, which the other four already
did, and uses `??` on the alert fields because NWS sends explicit nulls
rather than omitting them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Say "structured content", not "structured output"

The spec never uses the phrase "structured output". It defines two separate
things under Tool Result: "Structured Content" (the `structuredContent` field)
and "Output Schema" (the `outputSchema` field). Collapsing them into
"structured output" conflates the two.

It is also actively confusing here. In LLM tooling "structured output" means
constrained decoding — making the *model* emit conforming JSON. These clients
call a model API, so a reader could reasonably take the phrase to mean the
tool constrains the model's response, which is the opposite of what is going
on: the tool describes the shape of its own result.

Headings and prose now say "structured content". References to real
identifiers are left alone: the Python SDK's own docs page is called
Structured Output and lives at docs/servers/structured-output.md, and its
decorator parameter is `structured_output`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Address review feedback on the TypeScript weather server

- Point the structured-content link at the dated 2026-07-28 spec rather
  than /draft, since the surrounding text names that revision.
- Model a missing temperature as null instead of 0. `ForecastPeriod.temperature`
  is optional upstream, so the old `?? 0` published an incorrect but
  valid-looking 0degF rather than admitting the gap. The output schema now
  declares `z.number().nullable()`, and formatPeriod renders "Temperature:
  Unknown" for the null case instead of "null degF".
- Fall back to "Unknown" for a missing wind direction, matching the
  neighbouring fields.
- Report out-of-band errors via serveStdio's onerror callback.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Require Node 24 in the TypeScript examples

The client declared `>=20.0.0` and the server declared no floor at all,
while its lockfile root still recorded `>=16.0.0`. Node 20 reached end of
life on 2026-04-30, so it should not be what the examples ask people to
install.

Both packages now require `>=24.0.0`, the Active LTS, matching the Node 24
that ci.yml already provisions and the reasoning its comment already gives.
The SDK's own floor is `>=20`, but that is the oldest runtime the library
tolerates, not what an example should recommend. Lockfile roots regenerated;
no dependency versions move.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 22:20:07 +02:00
..
.env.example Add mcp-client-typescript 2025-02-17 11:16:18 -08:00
.gitignore Add mcp-client-typescript 2025-02-17 11:16:18 -08:00
index.ts Add structured content to the TypeScript weather server and client and update to v2 (#165) 2026-08-17 22:20:07 +02:00
package-lock.json Add structured content to the TypeScript weather server and client and update to v2 (#165) 2026-08-17 22:20:07 +02:00
package.json Add structured content to the TypeScript weather server and client and update to v2 (#165) 2026-08-17 22:20:07 +02:00
README.md Add structured content to the TypeScript weather server and client and update to v2 (#165) 2026-08-17 22:20:07 +02:00
tsconfig.json Prettier formatting 2025-02-19 10:30:17 -08:00

An LLM-Powered Chatbot MCP Client written in TypeScript

See the Build an MCP client tutorial for more information.

Structured content

The SDK validates every result against the tool's declared outputSchema, so the spec's client-side SHOULD needs no code here.

The two channels go to different readers: content is forwarded to the model, while structuredContent is used as data — when a tool returns an array, the client counts its items rather than re-reading the prose. See Structured Content.

versionNegotiation: { mode: 'auto' } probes server/discover and falls back to the 2025-11-25 handshake; the SDK's default is 'legacy'. See the SDK documentation.