Extra validation for registries (#484)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes --> Package identifier and version are required for some of the registries else we won't be able to pull the meta data to validate the packages. ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? --> This is in continuation to https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/pull/424 ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> Unit test. ## Breaking Changes <!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? --> No ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [ ] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [ ] New and existing tests pass locally - [ ] I have added appropriate error handling - [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> Co-authored-by: Avish Porwal <avishporwal@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ddcc586842
commit
31e16a18ec
1 changed files with 150 additions and 10 deletions
|
|
@ -29,4 +29,4 @@ func generateRandomImageName() string {
|
|||
return "nonexistent-image-fallback"
|
||||
}
|
||||
return fmt.Sprintf("nonexistent-image-%s", hex.EncodeToString(bytes)[:16])
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue