Commit graph registry/deploy/Pulumi.gcpStaging.yaml
Author SHA1 Message Date
pree-dew
a9ff705d80
Add monitoring infrastructure: victoriametrics and grafana (#328)
This includes infra setup for metrics collection and visualisation

## Motivation and Context
It is important to have basic observability setup, so that common issues
can be identified quickly

## How Has This Been Tested?
- Tested on local
- Tested on one of the production setup

## Breaking Changes
No

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [X] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [X] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [X] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [X] New and existing tests pass locally
- [X] I have added appropriate error handling
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
- This includes set up of following components:
- Victoriametrics single node cluster for storing metrics data with
persistent storage configuration for local and production env.
- Vmagent with target discovery for mcp-registry pods with scrape
interval of 30s.
  - Grafana for visualising metrics and setting alerts.
     - Datasource of victoriametrics is pre-configured as config map
     - Persistent volume for basic configuration
- Sqlite for local and Postgres for production setup for storing
dashboard, alerts etc details
 
 ## Metrics in action
<img width="1422" height="666" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-31 at 4 35 28 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e54ce846-653c-4fa3-aa7a-fe277f0810e6"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Adam Jones <adamj@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: adam jones <adamj+git@anthropic.com>
2025-09-02 12:40:43 +00:00
adam jones
e9fe6f9ab8
feat: Add creds for GitHub auth, add "none" auth to publisher (#276)
## Motivation and Context

- Adds credentials for the new MCP Registry Login GitHub Apps (local,
staging, prod)
- Adds support for "none" auth to publisher

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Tested publisher workflows locally
- Unit and integration tests passing

## Breaking Changes

None

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

---

Merging based on Tadas's approval review, and only making minor docs changes on top of that.
2025-08-18 15:49:04 +01:00
adam jones
c733cedaf8
auth: New auth flow (#273)
Fixes #264. Adds endpoints:

```
/v0/auth/github    # exchange a github token for a registry token that gives you access to namespaces io.github.username and io.github.org for your orgs
/v0/auth/none     # get a registry token for namespace io.modelcontextprotocol.anonymous (only for testing/local dev purposes)
```

Updates `/v0/publish` to accept one of these registry tokens.

## Motivation and Context

See #264

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Running locally and getting a token from `/v0/auth/none` and then
publishing to `/v0/publish`
- Updating the integration tests that get a token and then publish, and
them passing

## Breaking Changes

This is a breaking change to the auth API. This is fine for registry
given it's not deployed yet.

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <209825114+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: adam jones <domdomegg@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-08-15 13:03:35 +01:00
adam jones
fe52766676
deploy: Deploy the registry to GCP (#255)
Adds the Pulumi code to:
- Deploy the registry (and associated services e.g. mongodb) to Google
Cloud Platform (GCP), on top of Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
- Sets up proper environments and secrets management
- Uses the real container image, now that it's published in #225. At the
moment attached to latest, we might want to pin the version later (or
perhaps always use `latest` in staging, and pin prod)
- Uses real domains (`staging.registry.modelcontextprotocol.io`) rather
than examples (``)

## Motivation and Context

Setting up infrastructure to deploy it. I set something up in Azure in
#227, although not super robust (e.g. no service accounts etc.). Think
we will use GCP as:
- the maintainers have experience with GCP, but none with Azure
- costs are quite low, and Anthropic is happy to cover them in the short
term
- means we only have to maintain one login system (just Google Cloud
Identity), not two (Google Workspace + Azure)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Deployed this to a staging and production cluster. Try it yourself at:

```bash
curl -H "Host: staging.registry.modelcontextprotocol.io" -k https://35.222.36.75/v0/ping
```

(will be sorting out domains very soon)

## Breaking Changes

NA - just adds support for GCP deployment

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [ ] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->

Expected follow-ups:
- GitHub Action setup to deploy things to the cluster from GitHub, to
avoid gatekeeping to just the people with the secrets.
2025-08-12 17:44:50 +01:00