| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
685e354b2f |
feat: add cargo (crates.io) as a package registry type (#1207)
> **Update — 2026-06-01 (commit 1f3be53)** > > - **All @P4ST4S review feedback addressed** — positive-path hermetic mock + live anchor against `rust-faf-mcp v0.3.1`; 5xx routed as transient; doc comment qualified. See the [close-out comment](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/pull/1207#issuecomment-4589711057) for the per-item breakdown. > - **Runtime-model question RESOLVED** — `package-types.mdx` documents cargo and MCPB as both first-class Rust MCP distribution paths (cargo for source-distributed, MCPB for prebuilt-binary). The "Open question" section below was the original draft framing; the doc now ships the resolution. > - **Cargo-specific gotcha discovered and documented** — crates.io strips HTML comments during README rendering, unlike PyPI/NuGet. `package-types.mdx` now spells this out so cargo authors don't ship invisible mcp-name tokens (which is exactly what happened to `rust-faf-mcp v0.3.0`; fixed in v0.3.1). > - **Stale reference removed in this update** — the "Out of scope" line mentioning `docs/guides/publishing/publish-cargo.md` pointed at a path that doesn't exist. The canonical per-type doc is `docs/modelcontextprotocol-io/package-types.mdx`; the Cargo section has been added there directly. > - **Two real-world Rust MCP servers queued for day-one register**: `rust-faf-mcp v0.3.1` (live, end-to-end validated by the new live test) and `perfetto-mcp-rs` ([@0xZOne](https://github.com/0xZOne) in #1055). > - **Tests:** 19/19 cargo tests pass (16 existing + 2 hermetic + 1 live anchor). `make validate` clean. `golangci-lint` 0 issues. --- Adds support for `registryType: cargo` so Rust MCP servers published to crates.io can be registered through the documented validation flow rather than the MCPB binary-packaging workaround. Closes #1055. ## Motivation and Context #1055 noted that crates.io has ~1,800 MCP-related packages with no direct path into the registry — only the MCPB binary-packaging workaround. This PR adds first-class support for cargo as a package registry type: schema + API surface, validator, integration tests, and a documented example. The publishing guide (`docs/guides/publishing/publish-cargo.md`) follows on this branch once the runtime-model direction in **Additional context** is settled. ## How Has This Been Tested? - **`make validate`** — clean. Schema-vs-openapi sync verified; 17/17 examples in `generic-server-json.md` validate against the schema; `expectedServerJSONCount` bumped 16 → 17 to match the new Cargo example. - **`go test ./internal/validators/...`** — passes. 16 cargo validator sub-cases across 4 test functions, run against real crates.io (~2.5s wall): - Input validation rejection paths - Registry-baseURL rejection (4 variants: different host, trailing slash, http-not-https, subdomain typo) - Ownership validation against real crates (`serde`, `tokio`, `rand`) — all correctly rejected for missing `mcp-name` token - Server-name format variations (canonical `io.github.OWNER/REPO`, multi-hyphen, underscore, numeric suffix) - **Positive-path test** — gated on `rust-faf-mcp` v0.2.3+ being published with `mcp-name: io.github.Wolfe-Jam/rust-faf-mcp` in its README. Reserved as a TODO in `cargo_test.go`; uncomments to become the live anchor once that publish lands. - **Local `make test-unit`** — not run due to a Go toolchain version quirk on my workstation (project auto-downloads 1.26.0; my local `go` is 1.25.6, causing compile mismatch). CI will exercise the full PostgreSQL-backed suite. ## Breaking Changes None. This is an additive change — `cargo` joins the supported `registryType` enum alongside `npm`/`pypi`/`nuget`/`oci`/`mcpb`. Existing publishes continue to work unchanged. ## Types of changes - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [x] Documentation update (new Cargo example in `generic-server-json.md`) ## Checklist - [x] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [x] New and existing tests pass locally - [x] I have added appropriate error handling - [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context ### Validator design — two-call retrieval on the documented API `internal/validators/registries/cargo.go` mirrors the PyPI validator's README-token approach (substring-match `mcp-name: <serverName>`), with a two-call retrieval pattern to stay on the documented public crates.io API: 1. `GET /api/v1/crates/{name}/{version}/readme` returns 200 OK with a JSON pointer (`{"url": "https://static.crates.io/readmes/.../...html"}`) — crates.io hands us the URL rather than emitting a 302. 2. Follow the pointer to the rendered HTML; substring-match for the token. The two-call pattern stays on the documented public surface. The CDN URL layout is observed-stable, but treating it as the entry point would mean depending on an undocumented path. With two calls, crates.io controls where the README lives — if they move it, the metadata endpoint hands us the new URL. Missing crates and missing versions surface as **403** from the CDN (S3's default for missing keys), not 404. The validator treats any non-200 as "not found" and surfaces the actual status code in the error message. ### Open question — runtime model Cargo's runtime model is genuinely different from npm/PyPI/NuGet. `cargo install` is one-time (binary lands on PATH at `~/.cargo/bin`), not per-invocation like `npx`, `uvx`, or `dnx` (the new one in .NET 10 SDK Preview 6+). The new Cargo example in `generic-server-json.md` annotates this honestly and omits `runtimeHint`. If a different framing is preferred — e.g. recommending **MCPB** (prebuilt binary distribution via GitHub Releases) as the primary path for Rust MCP servers instead of cargo — happy to adjust the documentation accordingly. The schema + validator code in this PR is **additive** and doesn't force a recommendation either way; a Rust author who chooses cargo can use it, and one who prefers MCPB still can. ### Out of scope (deferred) - **`docs/guides/publishing/publish-cargo.md`** — follows on this branch once the runtime-model direction above is settled. - **Publisher CLI `Cargo.toml` autodetect** in `cmd/publisher/commands/init.go` — separate concern, separate PR. - **Positive-path validator test** — gated on `rust-faf-mcp` v0.2.3+ publishing as noted in *How Has This Been Tested?*. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com> |
||
|
|
7c446e75ad |
feat(oci): add support for Quay.io registry (#1150)
Adds support for the Quay.io container registry to the OCI validator. This allows MCP servers hosted on Quay.io to be registered and validated by the official registry. ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? --> Quay.io is a major, trusted public OCI registry widely used by the cloud-native and open-source communities. Currently, attempting to publish a server using a Quay image results in an unsupported OCI registry error. This change enables developers to use Quay.io as a first-class hosting option for their MCP server images. ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> - **Unit Tests:** Updated `internal/validators/registries/oci_test.go` to transition Quay.io from a rejected test case to an allowed one. - **Pattern Matching:** Verified that the allowlist correctly handles both specific image identifiers and general pattern matching for the `quay.io` host. - **Local Validation:** Ran `make check` to ensure no regressions in the existing OCI validation logic. ## Breaking Changes <!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? --> No. This is an additive change that expands the allowlist of supported registries. Existing configurations are unaffected. ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [x] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [x] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [x] New and existing tests pass locally - [x] I have added appropriate error handling - [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> The implementation follows the existing pattern for OCI registries: 1. Added a `RegistryURLQuay` constant to `pkg/model` for consistency. 2. Hardcoded `quay.io` into the `allowedOCIRegistries` map in the validator to minimize architectural complexity. 3. Updated all relevant documentation files (`package-types.mdx`, `generic-server-json.md`, and `official-registry-requirements.md`) to ensure the source of truth is updated across the project. 4. Validation remains scoped to public images; no private registry authentication was added for this host. Signed-off-by: Mikel Olasagasti Uranga <mikel@olasagasti.info> Co-authored-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com> |
||
|
|
b5f38fcc2a |
update schema url point to the actual location (#884)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes --> ## Motivation and Context This PR ensures that the draft URL points to the actual draft schema improvement suggested in https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/814 ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> ## Breaking Changes <!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? --> ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [ ] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [ ] New and existing tests pass locally - [ ] I have added appropriate error handling - [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> |
||
|
|
453956d975 |
chore: Release server.json schema version 2025-12-11 (#841)
Prepared by Claude Code, iterated and reviewed by me. ## Summary This PR releases the server.json schema version `2025-12-11`, incorporating URL template variables for remote servers from #570. ### What's New - **URL Template Variables for Remote Servers** - Remote servers can now define configurable variables in URLs using `{curly_braces}` notation, enabling multi-tenant deployments. ### Schema Version - `2025-10-17` → `2025-12-11` ## Release Sequence 1. ~~**First: Merge static repo PR** - https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/static/pull/11 (publishes schema to versioned URL)~~ 2. **Then: Merge this PR** - Updates registry code to reference the new schema version ## Changes in This PR - [x] Update CHANGELOG.md with release notes - [x] Update `CurrentSchemaVersion` in `pkg/model/constants.go` - [x] Update schema example URL in `docs/reference/api/openapi.yaml` - [x] Update schema URL in `pkg/api/v0/types.go` - [x] Update all documentation examples to use new schema version - [x] Regenerate `server.schema.json` ## Test Plan - [x] `make check` passes (lint, schema validation, example validation) - [x] Unit tests pass for validators and publisher commands 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
b58836c48e |
feat: Add LocalTransport/RemoteTransport with URL template variables (#570)
Co-authored with Claude Code, but I've closely reviewed/modified/vetted
all changes; ready for final review.
## Summary
This PR adds LocalTransport and RemoteTransport separation with URL
template variable support for remote servers, enabling e.g. multi-tenant
deployments with configurable endpoints.
**Key additions:**
- LocalTransport (for Packages) and RemoteTransport (for Remotes)
- URL template variables for remote transports (e.g., `{tenant_id}` in
URLs)
- Pattern validation ensuring URLs are URL-like while allowing templates
- Full test coverage via Go validator tests and documentation examples
## ⚠️ server.json Update
This PR updates the `server.json` schema. A new schema version will be
cut after this lands.
## Problem
The current schema describes URL templating with `{curly_braces}` for
transports but provides no mechanism for Remote contexts to define what
those variables should resolve to, making the feature unusable for
remote servers.
Referenced issue: #394
- Users need multi-tenant remote servers with different endpoints per
deployment
- Each tenant/region has its own URL (e.g., `us-cell1.example.com`,
`emea-cell1.example.com`)
- Current schema doesn't support parameterized remote URLs
## Solution
### Schema Architecture
**LocalTransport** (for Package context):
```typescript
LocalTransport = StdioTransport | StreamableHttpTransport | SseTransport
```
- Used in Package context (non-breaking rename of existing behavior)
- Variables in `{curly_braces}` reference parent Package
arguments/environment variables
- Supports all three transport types including stdio
**RemoteTransport** (for Remote context):
```typescript
RemoteTransport = (StreamableHttpTransport | SseTransport) + { variables: object }
```
- Extends StreamableHttp/Sse via `allOf` composition - no duplication!
- Adds `variables` object for URL templating
- Only supports streamable-http and sse (stdio not valid for remotes)
### Key Changes
**1. Schema Updates** (`openapi.yaml`, `server.schema.json`):
- Added `LocalTransport` union type for Package context
- Added `RemoteTransport` with `allOf` composition extending base
transports
- Updated Package to reference `LocalTransport`
- Updated remotes to reference `RemoteTransport`
- Added URL pattern validation: `^https?://[^\\s]+$` to both
StreamableHttp and SSE
- Removed `format: uri` from SSE (was blocking template variables)
**2. Go Types** (`pkg/model/types.go`):
- Base `Transport` struct unchanged for Package context
- `RemoteTransport` struct for remotes with `Variables` field
- Both work with existing validation infrastructure
**3. Validators** (`internal/validators/`):
- `validateRemoteTransport()` validates Remote-specific constraints
- `collectRemoteTransportVariables()` extracts available variables
- `IsValidTemplatedURL()` validates template variables reference defined
variables
- `IsValidRemoteURL()` handles template variable substitution before
localhost check
- 6 new test cases for remote transport variable validation
**4. Documentation Examples** (`generic-server-json.md`):
- Remote Server with URL Templating (StreamableHttp with `{tenant_id}`)
- SSE Remote with URL Templating (SSE with `{tenant_id}`)
- Local Server with URL Templating (Package with `{port}`)
- All examples validate via existing `validate-examples` tool
## Example: Remote Transport with Variables
```json
{
"remotes": [
{
"type": "streamable-http",
"url": "https://api.example.com/mcp/{tenant_id}/{region}",
"variables": {
"tenant_id": {
"description": "Tenant identifier",
"isRequired": true,
"choices": ["us-cell1", "emea-cell1", "apac-cell1"]
},
"region": {
"description": "Deployment region",
"isRequired": true
}
}
}
]
}
```
Clients configure the variables, and `{tenant_id}` and `{region}` get
replaced to connect to tenant-specific endpoints like
`https://api.example.com/mcp/us-cell1/east`.
## Architecture Details
**Context-based variable resolution:**
- **Package + LocalTransport**: `{port}` references `--port` argument or
`PORT` env var from parent Package
- **Remote + RemoteTransport**: `{tenant_id}` references
`variables.tenant_id` defined in the transport itself
- **Code reuse**: StreamableHttp/Sse definitions shared via `allOf`, not
duplicated
- **Validation**: Template variables validated against available
variables for each context
---
## Follow-on Work
Follow-on work will be done to adopt the feedback in
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/pull/570#issuecomment-3367417636
regarding variable naming/prioritzation/scoping conventions, but should
not have any impact on the shape being introduced here (just
validations).
---------
Co-authored-by: yuna0x0 <yuna@yuna0x0.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Connor Peet <connor@peet.io>
|
||
|
|
80cb03ff7a |
Fix NuGet.org base URL default, improve API integration (#813)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? --> This resolves https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/738. There are two issues with the NuGet.org integration today: 1. Change the `registryBaseUrl` for NuGet to `https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json`. `https://api.nuget.org` is not the entry point for our service and is not specific enough. `https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json` is the value that users put into their tooling to connect to our public registry (it is installed by default in .NET client tooling). 2. Use the service index API to get the URL pattern for package READMEs. - This URL is not guaranteed to be stable. The service index URL (`registryBaseUrl`) is, however. Additionally, I polished up the error messages so various error modes are clearer. When packages are published to NuGet.org, they take 2-5 minutes to become available due to validations we run. Some possible states that are now handled and described more helpfully are: - Version exists, but the package has no README - The ID exists, but the version does not - The ID does not exist at all There are only 3 authors (me, another MSFT person, and a community member) explicitly setting the old value. The DB migration will fix the issue. A future publish will fail with the validation error but the error message is clear. `registry type and base URL do not match: 'https://api.nuget.org' is not valid for registry type 'nuget'. Expected: https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json` ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> - Unit tests, new and existing - Manual test locally - Set old data in the DB, `docker compose up`, confirm the migration updates the specific package ## Breaking Changes Yes, but minimal impact expected, unless there is a dependency on the specific `https://api.nuget.org` value downstream. I am not aware of any such dependency, and the new value is more proper and specific. ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [x] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [x] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [x] New and existing tests pass locally - [x] I have added appropriate error handling - [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> For more information about the NuGet API see: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/api/overview#service-index (I wrote most of the docs). |
||
|
|
fadbba2364 |
Fix remaining broken links from docs reorganization (#789)
Follow-up to #728. This fixes broken links due to file renames. Fixes #788. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
45bf43f9d1 |
Remove namespace match validation for websiteUrl and remote URL (#769)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? --> Resolve https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/768 and https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/494. Require HTTPS for remote URLs. Currently all remote URLs on the MCP Registry are HTTPS. Also fix a test bug when running on Windows (bad temp path). ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> Unit tests. Published a server.json locally with a website URL not matching the server name. ## Breaking Changes <!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? --> ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [x] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [x] New and existing tests pass locally - [x] I have added appropriate error handling - [ ] ~I have added or updated documentation as needed~ N/A ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> |
||
|
|
0ef5b90ed7 |
Clarify the docs around _meta publisher extensions (#695) | ||
|
|
0828bc483c |
Make mcpb package version optional and fix schema validation (#686)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? --> The following PR: * Makes mcpb package version property optional * Bumps the schema and reflects that in the code * Makes sure the publisher tests are being covered by doing `make check` ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> ## Breaking Changes <!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? --> ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [ ] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [ ] New and existing tests pass locally - [ ] I have added appropriate error handling - [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> --------- Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com> |
||
|
|
632cbce815 |
Refactor package types to use dedicated schema types per package type (NPM, PyPI, NuGet, OCI, MCPB) (#634) | ||
|
|
44e35020b0 |
Add optional title field to server.json schema (#608)
## Summary Introduces a new optional `title` field for MCP servers to provide a clean, human-readable display name that clients and subregistries can use for display purposes. Fixes #606 ## Changes - Added `title` field to `ServerJSON` type (optional, max 100 chars) - Added validation to reject titles ending with 'MCP Server', 'MCP server', or 'MCP' suffixes - Updated JSON schema and OpenAPI specification - Added comprehensive test coverage for title validation - Updated all documentation examples to demonstrate the new field ## Validation The title field: - Is optional (can be omitted) - Must not be only whitespace if provided - Must not end with MCP-related suffixes (case-insensitive) - Can contain 'MCP' in the middle (e.g., "MCP Weather API" is valid) Examples: - ✅ Valid: "GitHub", "Weather API", "Slack Integration" - ❌ Invalid: "GitHub MCP", "Weather MCP Server", "Slack-MCP" --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
44950c23bb |
Enforce schema validation on the publish and edit API level (#598)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? --> The following PR: * Enforces schema validation on the API level (requests without schema or older schema will fail) * Updates the unit tests and examples to match that ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> ## Breaking Changes <!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? --> **Note this can be considered breaking if clients have not included it before.** ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [ ] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [ ] New and existing tests pass locally - [ ] I have added appropriate error handling - [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> --------- Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com> |
||
|
|
843783ac18 |
docs: make streamable-http the primary transport in examples (#602)
## Summary Changes `streamable-http` to be the recommended and primary transport type in documentation examples, while keeping SSE as a secondary option during the preview period. ## Changes - ✅ Update all primary remote server examples to use `streamable-http` - ✅ Reorder multi-transport examples to show `streamable-http` first - ✅ Add note that SSE is deprecated but still supported during preview - ✅ Update transport protocol requirements text to indicate `streamable-http` (recommended) and `sse` (deprecated) ## Context As noted in issue #487, the docs were using SSE as the primary example despite it being deprecated in the MCP specification (2025-06-18) in favor of streamable HTTP. This PR aligns the documentation with the spec while maintaining backward compatibility information for the preview period. Per maintainer feedback on the issue: - SSE is still supported during the preview phase - Eventually SSE support will be removed - The community would benefit from consistent messaging about the preferred transport ## Files Changed - `docs/guides/publishing/publish-server.md` - Main publishing guide - `docs/reference/server-json/generic-server-json.md` - Reference documentation with examples ## Approach This takes a balanced approach: - Makes streamable-http the clear primary/recommended option - Keeps SSE documented as supported during preview (not hidden) - Adds explicit note about deprecation status - Minimal changes, focused on examples and ordering Fixes #487 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
6972e542c3 |
docs: remove status field from server.json examples (#575)
## Summary
- Remove the `status` field from all server.json examples in
documentation
- Remove the deprecated server example that was primarily about
demonstrating the status field
- Update example count validation from 13 to 12
## Context
The `status` field was removed from the server.json schema in commit
|
||
|
|
b21c6f564d |
Changes on the server.json format and the API (#562) | ||
|
|
56e8b4879b |
Introduce serverId, rename id to versionId (#465)
Wielded Claude Code to do this; across many iterations and have reviewed all the code + largely rewritten the PR commentary here. This PR implements the server ID consistency changes from [#396](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/396). Our goal is to: - Rename `id` to `versionId` to make it clear that it is the ID for a specific version, not a server - Introduce `serverId` as a net new concept. This will be 1:1 with `name`. While not strictly necessary (we could just use name as a PK), the convention of having a UUID as an ID on our objects is just a helpful subjective architecture decision. Plus also leaves open the door to reconsidering the "should we allow renames" question. ## Key Changes ### 🗄️ Database Schema Changes - **Renamed**: `id` column → `version_id` (unique identifier for each server version) ### 📋 Metadata Structure Updates - **JSON Schema**: Updated `_meta.io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official` to include: - `serverId`: Consistent ID across all versions of a server - `versionId`: Unique ID for this specific version (renamed from `id`) ### 🔧 API Endpoint Updates - **New endpoint structure**: Changed from version-ID-based to server-ID-based URLs: - `GET /v0/servers/{server_id}` - Get latest version of server - `GET /v0/servers/{server_id}?version=X.X.X` - Get specific version - `GET /v0/servers/{server_id}/versions` - List all versions of a server - `PUT /v0/servers/{server_id}?version=X.X.X` - Edit specific version - **Consistent URL patterns**: All server endpoints now use `server_id` as the primary identifier ### Database Migration Strategy The migration (`005_add_server_id_rename_version_id.sql`): 1. Adds new `version_id` column 2. Generates deterministic UUIDs for servers with the same name 3. Updates JSON metadata to add `serverId` and rename `id` to `versionId` 4. Copies existing `id` values to `version_id` column 5. Drops old `id` column and makes `version_id` the new primary key ## Testing Besides of course automated tests passing, I: 1. Set up my local db with the pre-005-migration state, imported all the production data 2. Ran the migration 3. Spot checked some diffs of the data that resulted -- ```json // before { "name": "io.github.ruvnet/ruv-swarm", "_meta": { "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": { "id": "0a9cda7f-2b73-4839-844b-6582f335de42", "is_latest": false, "updated_at": "2025-09-10T17:21:34.92137012Z", "published_at": "2025-09-10T17:15:32.69690433Z" } }, "version": "1.0.18", "repository": { "url": "", "source": "" }, "description": "Neural network swarm orchestration with WebAssembly acceleration and MCP integration" } // after { "name": "io.github.ruvnet/ruv-swarm", "_meta": { "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": { "serverId": "e8538952-96af-4a33-9e31-7fbed012521e", "is_latest": false, "versionId": "0a9cda7f-2b73-4839-844b-6582f335de42", "updated_at": "2025-09-10T17:21:34.92137012Z", "published_at": "2025-09-10T17:15:32.69690433Z" } }, "version": "1.0.18", "repository": { "url": "", "source": "" }, "description": "Neural network swarm orchestration with WebAssembly acceleration and MCP integration" } ``` Servers that have multiple versions stayed consistent in their `serverId`: ```json // First version { "name": "app.getdialer/dialer", "_meta": { "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": { "serverId": "80f08bdb-f3e4-4f19-b072-1676ae49b663", "is_latest": false, "versionId": "04f25b17-331d-48d7-b08b-37baece208a7", "updated_at": "2025-09-09T00:16:49.162620072Z", "published_at": "2025-09-08T23:47:09.452137971Z" } }, "status": "active", "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json", "remotes": [ { "url": "https://getdialer.app/mcp", "type": "streamable-http" }, { "url": "https://getdialer.app/sse", "type": "sse" } ], "version": "1.0.0", "repository": { "url": "", "source": "" }, "description": "An MCP server that provides your you make outbound phone calls using your own phone number" } // Second version { "name": "app.getdialer/dialer", "_meta": { "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": { "serverId": "80f08bdb-f3e4-4f19-b072-1676ae49b663", "is_latest": true, "versionId": "faa26cb9-3aad-415e-aece-f715fff5fe5e", "updated_at": "2025-09-09T00:16:49.107842808Z", "published_at": "2025-09-09T00:16:49.107842808Z" } }, "status": "active", "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json", "remotes": [ { "url": "https://getdialer.app/mcp", "type": "streamable-http" }, { "url": "https://getdialer.app/sse", "type": "sse" } ], "version": "1.0.1", "repository": { "url": "", "source": "" }, "description": "An MCP server that provides lets you make outbound phone calls using your own phone number" } ``` And I also tried publishing a test server anew; looked good: ```bash ⏺ Bash(curl -s "http://localhost:8080/v0/servers/102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352" | jq '.') ⎿ { "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json", "name": "io.modelcontextprotocol.anonymous/test-claude-migration-server", "description": "A test server to verify the new migration and API endpoints work correctly", "status": "active", "repository": { "url": "https://github.com/example/test-claude-migration-server", "source": "github", "id": "example/test-claude-migration-server" }, "version": "1.0.0", "_meta": { "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": { "serverId": "102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352", "versionId": "48c9cd55-7bc4-4ac2-896e-59e81eb653e4", "published_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00", "updated_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00", "is_latest": true } } } ⏺ Bash(curl -s "http://localhost:8080/v0/servers/102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352/versions" | jq '.') ⎿ { "servers": [ { "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json", "name": "io.modelcontextprotocol.anonymous/test-claude-migration-server", "description": "A test server to verify the new migration and API endpoints work correctly", "status": "active", "repository": { "url": "https://github.com/example/test-claude-migration-server", "source": "github", "id": "example/test-claude-migration-server" }, "version": "1.0.0", "_meta": { "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": { "serverId": "102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352", "versionId": "48c9cd55-7bc4-4ac2-896e-59e81eb653e4", "published_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00", "updated_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00", "is_latest": true } } } ], "metadata": { "count": 1 } } ``` Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Preeti Dewani <preetidewani1990@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: adam jones <adamj+git@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Adam Jones <adamj@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
17eb56d4c7 |
feat: Add website_url field for MCP servers (#422)
Adds optional website_url field to the server.json schema allowing publishers to provide a url to the server's homepage, documentation, or project website. This provides a central link for users to learn more about the server. Particularly useful when the server has custom installation instructions or setup requirements. Issue: #183 PR: #130 Discussion: #274 ## Motivation and Context This change addresses the need identified in #130, #183 and #274 for a standardized way to direct users to an official landing page similar to `homepage` used in NPM ([example](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@modelcontextprotocol/sdk)). It is also serves as a viable option for MCP Servers that don't follow typical package manager patterns (e.g., embedded in a Desktop app). ## How Has This Been Tested? - Schema validation: All 13 example server.json files validate successfully against the updated schema - Go validator tests: Added additional test cases covering URL format validation and namespace matching - Run all checks: Updated example files to work with anonymous publishing and verified `make check` passes ## Breaking Changes None. The website_url field is optional and backward compatible with existing server.json files. ## Types of changes - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [x] Documentation update ## Checklist - [x] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [x] New and existing tests pass locally - [x] I have added appropriate error handling - [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context Security considerations: - Website URL validation enforces that the domain matches the publisher's reverse-DNS namespace - HTTP/HTTPS protocols are required (no file:// or other schemes) - Validation is consistent with existing remote URL validation patterns |
||
|
|
f975e68cf2 |
Clean up schema by simplifying version structure (#379)
## Summary Simplified the schema structure by: - Replacing `version_detail.version` with direct `version` field - Removing unused `release_date` field from seed data - Updating all API types, models, and tests to match new structure - Maintaining backwards compatibility in API responses This change makes the schema more intuitive and reduces nesting depth. |
||
|
|
ef4607720d |
Fix _meta field format for MCP spec compliance (#367)
## Summary
Updates the `_meta` field structure to be compliant with the MCP
specification by using proper `prefix/name` format for vendor
extensions.
### Changes
- **Registry metadata**: `io.modelcontextprotocol.registry` →
`io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official`
- **Publisher metadata**: `publisher` →
`io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided`
- **Database migration**: Updates indexes to use new field paths
- **Updated all code**: Service layer, validators, tests, and seed data
### Format Before
```json
{
"_meta": {
"publisher": { "license": "MIT" },
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry": { "id": "...", "is_latest": true }
}
}
```
### Format After
```json
{
"_meta": {
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided": { "license": "MIT" },
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": { "id": "...", "is_latest": true }
}
}
```
This resolves the naming collision with the planned top-level
`publisher` field and ensures compliance with MCP specification
requirements.
Fixes #356
|
||
|
|
2e7108d366 |
Big docs tidy up in preparation for launch (#364)
## Motivation and Context Docs currently don't have very clear organisation, and don't explain core flows. This fixes #89 (although we still might want to push these to `https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/`), based on the plan there. One minor change from that plan is that I merged tutorials and guides, because they ended up basically being duplicates which I thought would be annoying for us to keep in sync. Additionally in the Diátaxis framework, tutorials and guides are separated by whether they are focused on acquisition of skills (e.g. in a learning environment) or application of skills (e.g. in a work environment). I expect the registry to be something that will be used occasionally in a work environment, rather than a fundamental 'learnable' skill so I think it's reasonable not to have tutorials and fold these into guides. ## How Has This Been Tested? - Read through all these updated docs - Unit and integration tests (that previously used examples.md and use the schema) working - Ran `npx markdown-link-check .` to check all the links work ## Breaking Changes Links to old docs will break, but I don't think there are any. All internal links have been checked and updated. ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [x] Documentation update |
Renamed from docs/server-json/examples.md (Previous history)