Adds polygraph (https://polygraph.so) to the **Other** section of
`docs/community-projects.md`, per the *Adding Your Project* instructions
(one-line entry).
polygraph publishes independent behavioral security grades (A–F) for MCP
servers from an open, reproducible harness
(https://github.com/polygraphso/litmus) — it exercises a server's live
tool surface and grades what it does (tool-output injection, undeclared
egress, sensitive-data handling, adversarial-input robustness), then
publishes the results as an adoption-ranked index with per-server
reports. It reads the official registry to discover and version servers,
and adds the independent ratings layer this project's docs note
downstream aggregators can provide.
One-line entry only; no code or schema changes.
## Summary
- Add a new **Registry Implementations** section to
`docs/community-projects.md` for self-hostable servers that implement
the MCP Registry API spec.
- Move existing **ToolSDK MCP Registry** entry from "Other" into the new
section.
- Add **ToolHive Registry Server**
(https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive-registry-server) to the new
section.
## Test plan
- [x] `docs/community-projects.md` renders correctly (markdown only, no
build step).
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
## Motivation and Context
Added a fully client-side browser for MCP registry APIs to the
`community-projects.md` documentation page:
https://vemonet.github.io/mcp-registry
I built it because I was missing a way to easily configure a server and
export the configuration (existing browsers I have found show the
available parameters, but you still need to manually build the JSON):
- It shows a user friendly form that enables to configure MCP servers
based on their registry entry, making it easier to understand and fill
the configuration required for deploying a server (instead of having to
read through JSON, and manually build another JSON). Then users can
either copy the generated config or install in client with custom URL
handler like VSCode/cursor in 1 click
- It is a thin client UI layer over the existing registry API, it does
not offer additional classification, complex filtering, or semantic
search (we don't use an additional server or database). So it is more of
a tool to make it user friendly to directly access a raw registry
content and inspects available servers, than an opinionated browser with
advanced search capabilities
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [ ] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed
## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->
Follow-up to #728.
This fixes broken links due to file renames.
Fixes#788.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Motivation and Context
I found the current raw assorted list of community project a bit
overwhelming and confusing at first.
So I gave some thought to it, and realized that at first I primarily
wanted to see what there is to browse the registry - so that should
probably go first? (The current magnifying glass icon, which was even
missing on one of the links, wasn't obvious enough, for me.)
Also I was looking for a Java client, and realized there already Go and
TS clients in this list - let's group those.
The Other section in the middle is for everything else (for now, it can
always further evolve, later).
## How Has This Been Tested?
N/A, as documentation only.
## Breaking Changes
Nope, it's documentation only.
## Types of changes
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [X] Documentation update
## Checklist
- [X] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [X] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [X] New and existing tests pass locally
- [X] I have added appropriate error handling
- [X] I have added or updated documentation as needed
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
Updated the project entry from **Awesome MCP Registry** to **ToolSDK MCP
Registry**, reflecting the new GitHub repository name and official
project name.
> We’re honored that our Sub Registry project has been included in the
official MCP Registry. To better reflect its purpose and maintain a more
professional naming convention, we’re updating the entry name from
**Awesome MCP Registry** to **ToolSDK MCP Registry**. This change
replaces the earlier, more generic name “Awesome” with a clearer and
more representative title for the project.
>
> *Based on GitHub’s renaming mechanism, the old link remains valid and
will automatically redirect to the new repository.*
## Motivation and Context
The project repository has been renamed and migrated from
[`toolsdk-ai/awesome-mcp-registry`](https://github.com/toolsdk-ai/awesome-mcp-registry)
→
[`toolsdk-ai/toolsdk-mcp-registry`](https://github.com/toolsdk-ai/toolsdk-mcp-registry).
This update ensures that the community registry points to the **correct
and active repository**, while maintaining the same project description
and context. The **ToolSDK MCP Registry** continues to extend the MCP
Registry with **API-based MCP execution**, **private deployment**, and
**secure sandbox isolation**.
---
## How Has This Been Tested?
Verified that the new link is accessible and points to the correct
repository. All descriptions and formatting remain consistent with other
community entries.
---
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes — documentation update only.
---
## Types of changes
* [x] Documentation update
---
## Checklist
* [x] I have verified the new link and repository name
* [x] I have followed the repository’s documentation style
* [x] The update aligns with MCP community contribution guidelines
---
## Additional context
This change reflects a **repository rename** for clarity and branding
consistency. The project functionality and scope remain the same.
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
Added **Awesome MCP Registry** to the Featured Projects list — a
community project that extends the MCP Registry with **API-based MCP
execution**, **private deployment**, and **secure sandbox isolation**.
---
## Motivation and Context
Most existing MCP Registry projects primarily serve as directories —
they list available MCP servers but do not support actual invocation or
interaction.
**Awesome MCP Registry** bridges this gap by enabling **direct API
execution of MCPs** within a **sandboxed** and **self-hostable**
environment.
This allows developers and enterprises to safely run, test, and
integrate MCP servers in **private infrastructure** while maintaining
full control over data and execution.
---
## How Has This Been Tested?
The project has been validated in private and local deployments using
various MCP servers.
API execution, sandbox isolation, and registry synchronization have been
tested successfully in both development and production-like
environments.
---
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes — documentation update only.
---
## Types of changes
* [x] Documentation update
---
## Checklist
* [x] I have read the [[MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/)](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
* [x] The project description follows the repository’s style guidelines
* [x] The project link and summary are verified and accurate
* [x] The addition aligns with the MCP community contribution standards
---
## Additional context
This addition highlights a project that **extends the traditional MCP
Registry model** by introducing **execution capabilities**, making it a
practical foundation for **secure, private, and automated MCP
workflows**.
---------
Co-authored-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com>
Adds [go-mcp-registry](https://github.com/leefowlercu/go-mcp-registry)
to the Community Projects documentation
## Motivation and Context
Wanted to add my project to your community projects documentation
## How Has This Been Tested?
No testing necessary
## Breaking Changes
None
## Types of changes
- [x] Documentation update
## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [ ] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed
## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->
Adds a link to a new community project
## Motivation and Context
This addresses the need to have a web browsable, live page of the MCP
server registry.
## Types of changes
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
## Additional context
Provides both a web browsable link and a SQLite database. Database can
be connected to or downloaded.
This PR contains a few commits, but the punchline is that we add a "🔎"
icon next to community projects that provide an in-browser UI for the
registry. The intention is that these projects can serve as a stopgap or
substitute for
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/99.
This is just a first take. Very open to feedback!
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
Adds a remote mcp server so that you can browse the mcp registry using
MCP - all remote, so you only need a URL
`https://registry-mcp.remote-mcp.com/`
## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update
## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [ ] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed
## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
Add the MCP registry cheat sheet project link in
`/docs/community-projects.md`
## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
It will be beneficial to have a cheat sheet that describes what are the
spaces of docs, organizes the spaces, and provides references to
detailed docs/guides/references. With such cheat sheet, new users would
quickly navigate in different spaces and find what commands and docs
they need.
More discussion at #540
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
No test needed.
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
## Motivation and Context
Add MCP Server for MCP Registry to community-projects
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [ ] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed
## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->
Add three new community projects to the community-projects.md reference:
- mcp-registry-cli: CLI tool for navigating registry servers
- mcp-insights: Analytics and insights platform
- Open Chat MCP Registry Client: TypeScript client implementation
## Summary
Add Community Resources section to GitHub Actions guide referencing
OtherVibes/mcp-publish-action as requested in discussion #518.
## Changes
- Add "Community Resources" section to
`docs/guides/publishing/github-actions.md`
- Include reference to OtherVibes/mcp-publish-action with appropriate
disclaimers
- Provide example usage and key features
- Position after Tips section for discoverability
- Structure allows for future community tool additions
## Context
This addresses the community request in discussion #518 where
@OtherVibes suggested adding a reference to their reusable GitHub Action
in the publishing docs. The maintainers (@tadasant, @domdomegg) approved
adding a community resources section with appropriate disclaimers.
The implementation follows the original request to add the reference
specifically to the GitHub Actions guide
(`docs/guides/publishing/github-actions.md`) rather than creating a
separate page.
## Benefits
- Provides users with a streamlined, community-built option for MCP
server publishing
- Reduces workflow boilerplate for developers
- Includes clear disclaimers about third-party tools
- Maintains documentation cohesion by keeping everything in the relevant
file
Closes#518
---------
Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com>
Co-authored-by: OtherVibes <othervibes@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com>
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
The following adds a doc to reference community projects.
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [ ] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed
## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->
Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com>
