Commit graph registry/cmd/publisher/auth
Author SHA1 Message Date
Radoslav Dimitrov
f5f08bc92d
Implement --token and MCP_GITHUB_TOKEN login support (#705)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->

## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
The following PR implements the missing support for logging in via
`--token` or `MCP_GITHUB_TOKEN`

## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->

## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [ ] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->
Fixes: #698

---------

Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com>
2025-10-29 17:23:41 +02:00
Joel Verhagen
88c2e1be16
Enable Google KMS and Azure Key Vault for publisher login tool (#696)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->

## Motivation and Context

This allows the private key used for DNS or HTTP based authentication to
be stored securely in a cloud key management system. These services
often provide HSM storage which makes it very hard to leak the private
key.

The full context is described in my design document here:

https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/482#issuecomment-3437117171

## How Has This Been Tested?

I have tested it against PROD using an Ed25519 key stored in Google KMS.
I have added unit tests. I have tested both ECDSA P-384 and Ed25519 with
Az KV and Google KMS against a locally running server.

## Breaking Changes

None intended.

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: adam jones <domdomegg+git@gmail.com>
2025-10-29 13:23:20 +00:00
Radoslav Dimitrov
4805f5c66d
Fix main by implementing a go1.24 compliant parseRawPrivateKey method (#707)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->

## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
The following fixes the currently failing build on main because we
reverted to go 1.24 and the last commit was relying on a method solely
available in 1.25.

The method is quite straightforward so we just reimplemented it. 

## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->

## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [ ] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->

Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com>
2025-10-24 23:07:55 +03:00
Joel Verhagen
6c0f085708
Add support for ECDSA P-384 (#685)
## Motivation and Context

See
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/482#issuecomment-3436993157
for full details.

This adds ECDSA P-384 (a popular NIST approved curve) in addition to
Ed25519.

## How Has This Been Tested?

I have tested with a local deployment against `mcp.joelverhagen.com`.
Also, I have added significant tests.

## Breaking Changes

None. (hopefully)

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->

@domdomegg and I spoke a bit about this on Discord:
https://discord.com/channels/1358869848138059966/1369487942862504016/1423710918180606052

---------

Co-authored-by: adam jones <domdomegg+git@gmail.com>
2025-10-24 12:02:33 -06:00
adam jones
53f4d2fd8e
Move publisher CLI from tools/ to cmd/ (#326)
## Summary

Move the publisher CLI from `tools/publisher/` to `cmd/publisher/` as
it's a proper application rather than a development utility.

This addresses feedback from @rdimitrov in PR #324 that the publisher
CLI should be under `cmd/` since it's not really a tool in the same
sense as other helpers in the `tools/` folder.

## Changes

- Moved `tools/publisher/` directory to `cmd/publisher/`
- Updated Makefile build and clean targets
- Updated README.md documentation links
- Updated VS Code launch configuration
- Updated integration test script
- Updated FAQ documentation
- Fixed Go import paths in publisher code

---------

Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <209825114+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: adam jones <domdomegg@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-08-29 14:45:36 +01:00