Commit graph registry/tests/integration/main.go
Author SHA1 Message Date
adam jones
b8106340bc
Tidy up command structure for MCP Publisher (#324)
## Summary
- Improved command structure and organization for the MCP Publisher CLI
- Enhanced readability and maintainability of publisher commands
- Cleaned up publish and edit handler logic

This builds on the previous cleanup work to further streamline the
publisher interface.

This also works as part of
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/89
2025-08-29 12:44:49 +01:00
Radoslav Dimitrov
8d7e471fd3
Allow for vendor extensions on servers (#298)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
This PR serves as a placeholder and brings together all of the changes
related to supporting vendor extensions passed through the API. The idea
is to have a single place to track and review the work as it comes
together (even if it’s still a bit of a work in progress).

**The changes in this PR cover:**
* Updates on the data model
* Updates on both databases (in-memory and postgresql), added a new
table to PSQL for tracking the extensions leaving the server table only
for the clean server.json properties
* Updates the seed.json file (thus the big line change)
* Adds a seed-migrate tool to help migrating an existing seed file to
the new format
* Updates the seed import mechanism to support this
* Updates the existing tests - unit, integration and validation tests
* Adds the publish handler to the OpenAPI spec (it was missing)
* Fixes linting errors
* Updates on the API side on (publish, list, get) to support the new
format of `ServerResponse` -
```
{
  "server": {},
  "x-io.modelcontextprotocol.registry": {}, /*not available for publish since this gets populated by the registry*/
  "x-publisher": {}
}
```

## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
Motivated by the discussions in:
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/discussions/284

## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
Locally and by running all of the tests

## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->
Yes, it changes both the API and the format of the seed file
 
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update

---

Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com>
Co-authored-by: adam jones <domdomegg+git@gmail.com>
2025-08-23 09:59:03 +01:00
adam jones
e9fe6f9ab8
feat: Add creds for GitHub auth, add "none" auth to publisher (#276)
## Motivation and Context

- Adds credentials for the new MCP Registry Login GitHub Apps (local,
staging, prod)
- Adds support for "none" auth to publisher

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Tested publisher workflows locally
- Unit and integration tests passing

## Breaking Changes

None

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

---

Merging based on Tadas's approval review, and only making minor docs changes on top of that.
2025-08-18 15:49:04 +01:00
adam jones
c733cedaf8
auth: New auth flow (#273)
Fixes #264. Adds endpoints:

```
/v0/auth/github    # exchange a github token for a registry token that gives you access to namespaces io.github.username and io.github.org for your orgs
/v0/auth/none     # get a registry token for namespace io.modelcontextprotocol.anonymous (only for testing/local dev purposes)
```

Updates `/v0/publish` to accept one of these registry tokens.

## Motivation and Context

See #264

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Running locally and getting a token from `/v0/auth/none` and then
publishing to `/v0/publish`
- Updating the integration tests that get a token and then publish, and
them passing

## Breaking Changes

This is a breaking change to the auth API. This is fine for registry
given it's not deployed yet.

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <209825114+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: adam jones <domdomegg@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-08-15 13:03:35 +01:00
Charles Lowell
4f5e85b510
End-to-end publish test using examples from docs (#199) 2025-07-25 16:09:17 -07:00