Commit graph registry/internal/database/migrations
Author SHA1 Message Date
Tadas Antanavicius
272ee9322d
fix: add server name validation and clean invalid data before migration 009 (#591)
## Summary

This PR adds two important improvements to ensure data integrity:

1. **Adds server name format validation at the API layer** to match the
database constraint from migration 008
2. **Includes migration 008 to clean up invalid data** before applying
strict constraints in migration 009

## Changes

### Server Name Validation
- Enforces validation at the API layer matching the database constraint
- **Namespace pattern**: `[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9.-]*[a-zA-Z0-9]` 
  - Must start and end with alphanumeric characters
  - Can contain dots and hyphens in the middle
- **Name pattern**: `[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9._-]*[a-zA-Z0-9]`
  - Must start and end with alphanumeric characters  
  - Can contain dots, underscores, and hyphens in the middle
- Provides clear, user-friendly error messages indicating which part is
invalid
- Uses DRY approach with composed regex patterns

### Migration 008: Data Cleanup
- Removes servers with invalid names or empty versions (5 servers
affected in production)
- Fixes invalid status values by setting them to 'active' (1 server
affected)
- Removes duplicate name+version combinations
- Includes comprehensive safety checks to prevent accidental data loss
- Must run before migration 009 which adds strict constraints

## Testing
- All validator tests pass
- Migration includes safety checks that match production data
- CI verification included

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-09-30 20:07:42 +03:00
Tadas Antanavicius
2d49e5b68c
fix: prevent NULL status values during migration 008 (#587)
## Summary
- Fixes migration 008 failing with "column contains null values" error
- Adds COALESCE protection to handle 126 servers without status fields
- Includes test utilities to reproduce and verify fixes with production
data

## Problem

Migration 008 was failing in production because:
- 126 out of 781 servers have no `status` field in their JSON
- When extracting `rec.value->>'status'`, these became NULL values
- The `ALTER TABLE servers ALTER COLUMN status SET NOT NULL` constraint
then failed

## Solution

1. **Prevent NULLs during migration**: Use COALESCE to provide 'active'
default when status is NULL/empty
2. **Enhanced debugging**: Added RAISE NOTICE statements to log
problematic values
3. **Safety check**: Double-check that throws exception if any NULLs
remain
4. **Test utilities**: Created mirror_data tools to test migrations with
real production data

## Testing

Created and used `scripts/mirror_data/` tools to:
- Fetch all 781 servers from production API
- Load them into a test database
- Verify the migration fix works correctly

### Results:
- **Before fix**: 126 NULL status values created during migration
- **After fix**: 0 NULL status values, all servers have valid status
- Migration completes successfully with NOT NULL constraint

## Test plan
- [x] Tested locally with production data using mirror_data tools
- [x] Verified 0 NULL values after migration (vs 126 before)
- [x] Confirmed NOT NULL constraint adds successfully
- [ ] Deploy to staging and verify migration succeeds
- [ ] Monitor production deployment

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-09-30 06:43:26 -07:00
Radoslav Dimitrov
e39b008b41
Ensure we populate sane defaults for NULL values (#583)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->

## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
The following PR tries to ensure sane defaults for entries that for one
reason or another have NULL values for some of their properties.

## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->

## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [ ] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->

---------

Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com>
2025-09-30 15:47:18 +03:00
Tadas Antanavicius
3dc4f93370
fix: handle NULL status values in migration 008 (#578)
## Problem

Production deployment is failing with CrashLoopBackOff. Migration 008
fails with:
```
ERROR: column "status" of relation "servers" contains null values (SQLSTATE 23502)
```

## Root Cause

The migration extracts the `status` field from an unexpected location in
the data structure.

### Actual Data Structure (Before Migration)

In the current format, `status` is at the **top level** of the JSON, not
nested in official metadata:

```json
{
  "name": "com.example/server",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "status": "active",           ← STATUS IS HERE (top level)
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
      "serverId": "uuid",
      "publishedAt": "2025-09-01T00:00:00Z",
      "isLatest": true
      // NO STATUS FIELD HERE
    }
  }
}
```

For 120 out of 765 servers, the status field is **missing entirely**:
```json
{
  "name": "com.biodnd/agent-ip",
  "version": "0.1.2",
  // ← NO STATUS FIELD AT ALL
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
      "serverId": "uuid",
      "publishedAt": "2025-09-23T09:47:07Z",
      "isLatest": true
      // STILL NO STATUS FIELD HERE
    }
  }
}
```

### Original Migration Logic

```sql
IF official_meta IS NOT NULL THEN
    UPDATE servers
    SET
        status = (official_meta->>'status'),  -- Extracts NULL for all servers
```

**Result:** 
- All 765 servers would have NULL status extracted
- Because `official_meta->>'status'` returns NULL (field doesn't exist
there)
- The migration tries to add `NOT NULL` constraint → fails

### Fixed Migration Logic

```sql
IF official_meta IS NOT NULL THEN
    UPDATE servers
    SET
        status = COALESCE(NULLIF(rec.value->>'status', 'null'), 'active'),
```

**Result:**
- Extracts from top-level JSON where status actually exists
- `NULLIF(rec.value->>'status', 'null')` handles edge case of literal
string "null"
- `COALESCE(..., 'active')` provides fallback when status is missing
- All servers get valid status value

### Impact Breakdown

**645 servers with `"status": "active"`:**
- Before fix: Would extract NULL → migration fails
- After fix: Extracts "active" correctly

**120 servers with missing status field:**
- Before fix: Would extract NULL → migration fails  
- After fix: Defaults to 'active' via COALESCE

## Example Servers with Missing Status

(First 9 discovered during investigation)
- com.biodnd/agent-ip
- io.github.jkakar/cookwith-mcp
- com.joelverhagen.mcp/Knapcode.SampleMcpServer
- io.github.Lyellr88/marm-mcp-server
- com.biodnd/agent-press
- io.github.timheuer/sampledotnetmcpserver
- io.github.CodeCraftersLLC/local-voice-mcp
- com.biodnd/agent-fin
- io.github.ruvnet/ruv-swarm

## Testing

Verified against production data (765 total servers):
- ✅ All servers have official metadata
- ✅ None have status in official metadata (expected)
- ✅ 645 have "status": "active" at top level
- ✅ 120 have missing status field (no field present)
- ✅ Fix extracts from correct location for all cases

## Impact

This unblocks production deployment. Once merged and released as v1.2.1,
the migration will:
1. Extract status from the correct location (top-level JSON)
2. Handle missing status fields with sensible defaults
3. Successfully add NOT NULL constraint
4. Allow pods to start normally

---
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
2025-09-30 10:21:48 +03:00
Radoslav Dimitrov
b21c6f564d
Changes on the server.json format and the API (#562) 2025-09-29 23:30:35 +03:00
adam jones
60c801c0c2
Fix race conditions in concurrent server publishing (#528)
## Summary

Fixes race conditions in concurrent server publishing that could result
in data integrity violations:
- Multiple versions marked as `isLatest=true` for the same server
- Duplicate (serverId, version) combinations
- Same server name assigned different serverIDs

## Solution

Uses two complementary approaches for correctness:

### 1. PostgreSQL Advisory Locks
- Serializes concurrent publishes per server name using
`pg_advisory_xact_lock`
- Uses FNV-1a hash to convert server name to lock ID
- Transaction-scoped locks auto-release on commit/rollback
- **Required after #465**: The serverId introduction means concurrent
publishes must atomically coordinate whether to reuse an existing
serverId (for additional versions) or generate a new one (for first
version). Without locks, race conditions would assign different
serverIDs to versions of the same server.

### 2. Unique Constraints (Migration 007)
Two new indexes provide data integrity guarantees:
- **idx_unique_server_version**: Ensures (serverId, version) is unique
across all versions
- **idx_unique_latest_version**: Partial index ensuring only one version
per serverId has `isLatest=true`

These constraints serve as defense-in-depth safety nets. Even if lock
logic had a bug, the database would reject integrity violations.

Also drops redundant `idx_servers_version_id` since `version_id` is
already the primary key.

## Why WithPublishLock validation is needed after #465

The `ctx.Err()` check at the start of `WithPublishLock` is critical
because:
1. After #465 introduced serverId, the publish flow must atomically
check existing versions and assign/reuse serverId
2. If the context is cancelled during lock acquisition, we could
deadlock
3. Checking ctx validity before acquiring locks prevents these deadlocks

## Testing

Added `TestPublishConcurrentVersionsNoRace` with 100 concurrent
goroutines publishing different versions of the same server. All succeed
with:
- Exactly one version marked as latest
- All versions sharing the same serverId
- No duplicate (serverId, version) combinations

NB: this only covers the in memory db, not the postgres db. It'd be nice
to write tests for this one as well, but our current setup is a bit
annoying for this. Separately looking into ways to easily run all our
tests with real postgres and ideally scrap memory.go completely.
2025-09-22 12:16:05 +01:00
Preeti Dewani
53f808a2c1
add migraiton file to convert snake case to camel case (#522)
## Motivation and Context
- Make all entries in current database matching the new schema

## How Has This Been Tested?
- locally

## Breaking Changes
- Yes

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [X] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [X] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [X] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [X] New and existing tests pass locally
- [ ] I have added appropriate error handling
- [X] I have added or updated documentation as needed

Before migration:

```
{
      "name": "io.github.kenjihikmatullah/productboard-mcp",
      "description": "Integrate the Productboard API into agentic workflows via MCP",
      "status": "active",
      "repository": {
        "url": "https://github.com/kenjihikmatullah/productboard-mcp",
        "source": "github",
        "id": "939104710"
      },
      "version": "0.0.1-seed",
      "packages": [
        {
          "registry_type": "npm",
          "identifier": "productboard-mcp",
          "version": "1.0.1",
          "transport": {
            "type": "stdio"
          }
        }
      ],
      "_meta": {
        "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
          "id": "00613acb-73e2-4f93-8b96-296df17316c8",
          "published_at": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z",
          "updated_at": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z",
          "is_latest": true
        }
      }
    }
    
```

After migration:

```
 {
      "name": "io.github.kenjihikmatullah/productboard-mcp",
      "description": "Integrate the Productboard API into agentic workflows via MCP",
      "status": "active",
      "repository": {
        "url": "https://github.com/kenjihikmatullah/productboard-mcp",
        "source": "github",
        "id": "939104710"
      },
      "version": "0.0.1-seed",
      "packages": [
        {
          "registryType": "npm",
          "identifier": "productboard-mcp",
          "version": "1.0.1",
          "transport": {
            "type": "stdio"
          },
        }
      ],
      "_meta": {
        "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
          "serverId": "83cfe55c-55c5-4e7e-b9c0-6d7d369f52ed",
          "versionId": "00613acb-73e2-4f93-8b96-296df17316c8",
          "publishedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z",
          "updatedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z",
          "isLatest": true
        }
      }
    }
2025-09-21 15:26:15 +03:00
Tadas Antanavicius
56e8b4879b
Introduce serverId, rename id to versionId (#465)
Wielded Claude Code to do this; across many iterations and have reviewed
all the code + largely rewritten the PR commentary here.

This PR implements the server ID consistency changes from
[#396](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/396). Our
goal is to:
- Rename `id` to `versionId` to make it clear that it is the ID for a
specific version, not a server
- Introduce `serverId` as a net new concept. This will be 1:1 with
`name`. While not strictly necessary (we could just use name as a PK),
the convention of having a UUID as an ID on our objects is just a
helpful subjective architecture decision. Plus also leaves open the door
to reconsidering the "should we allow renames" question.

## Key Changes

### 🗄️ Database Schema Changes
- **Renamed**: `id` column → `version_id` (unique identifier for each
server version)

### 📋 Metadata Structure Updates
- **JSON Schema**: Updated
`_meta.io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official` to include:
  - `serverId`: Consistent ID across all versions of a server
  - `versionId`: Unique ID for this specific version (renamed from `id`)

### 🔧 API Endpoint Updates
- **New endpoint structure**: Changed from version-ID-based to
server-ID-based URLs:
  - `GET /v0/servers/{server_id}` - Get latest version of server
  - `GET /v0/servers/{server_id}?version=X.X.X` - Get specific version  
- `GET /v0/servers/{server_id}/versions` - List all versions of a server
  - `PUT /v0/servers/{server_id}?version=X.X.X` - Edit specific version
- **Consistent URL patterns**: All server endpoints now use `server_id`
as the primary identifier
 
### Database Migration Strategy
The migration (`005_add_server_id_rename_version_id.sql`):
1. Adds new `version_id` column  
2. Generates deterministic UUIDs for servers with the same name
3. Updates JSON metadata to add `serverId` and rename `id` to
`versionId`
4. Copies existing `id` values to `version_id` column
5. Drops old `id` column and makes `version_id` the new primary key

## Testing

Besides of course automated tests passing, I:
1. Set up my local db with the pre-005-migration state, imported all the
production data
2. Ran the migration
3. Spot checked some diffs of the data that resulted --

```json
// before
{
  "name": "io.github.ruvnet/ruv-swarm",
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
      "id": "0a9cda7f-2b73-4839-844b-6582f335de42",
      "is_latest": false,
      "updated_at": "2025-09-10T17:21:34.92137012Z",
      "published_at": "2025-09-10T17:15:32.69690433Z"
    }
  },
  "version": "1.0.18",
  "repository": {
    "url": "",
    "source": ""
  },
  "description": "Neural network swarm orchestration with WebAssembly acceleration and MCP integration"
}

// after
{
  "name": "io.github.ruvnet/ruv-swarm",
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
      "serverId": "e8538952-96af-4a33-9e31-7fbed012521e",
      "is_latest": false,
      "versionId": "0a9cda7f-2b73-4839-844b-6582f335de42",
      "updated_at": "2025-09-10T17:21:34.92137012Z",
      "published_at": "2025-09-10T17:15:32.69690433Z"
    }
  },
  "version": "1.0.18",
  "repository": {
    "url": "",
    "source": ""
  },
  "description": "Neural network swarm orchestration with WebAssembly acceleration and MCP integration"
}

```

Servers that have multiple versions stayed consistent in their
`serverId`:

```json
// First version
{
  "name": "app.getdialer/dialer",
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
      "serverId": "80f08bdb-f3e4-4f19-b072-1676ae49b663",
      "is_latest": false,
      "versionId": "04f25b17-331d-48d7-b08b-37baece208a7",
      "updated_at": "2025-09-09T00:16:49.162620072Z",
      "published_at": "2025-09-08T23:47:09.452137971Z"
    }
  },
  "status": "active",
  "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json",
  "remotes": [
    {
      "url": "https://getdialer.app/mcp",
      "type": "streamable-http"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://getdialer.app/sse",
      "type": "sse"
    }
  ],
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "repository": {
    "url": "",
    "source": ""
  },
  "description": "An MCP server that provides your you make outbound phone calls using your own phone number"
}

// Second version
{
  "name": "app.getdialer/dialer",
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
      "serverId": "80f08bdb-f3e4-4f19-b072-1676ae49b663",
      "is_latest": true,
      "versionId": "faa26cb9-3aad-415e-aece-f715fff5fe5e",
      "updated_at": "2025-09-09T00:16:49.107842808Z",
      "published_at": "2025-09-09T00:16:49.107842808Z"
    }
  },
  "status": "active",
  "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json",
  "remotes": [
    {
      "url": "https://getdialer.app/mcp",
      "type": "streamable-http"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://getdialer.app/sse",
      "type": "sse"
    }
  ],
  "version": "1.0.1",
  "repository": {
    "url": "",
    "source": ""
  },
  "description": "An MCP server that provides lets you make outbound phone calls using your own phone number"
}
```

And I also tried publishing a test server anew; looked good:

```bash
⏺ Bash(curl -s "http://localhost:8080/v0/servers/102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352" | jq '.')
  ⎿  {                                                                                             
       "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json",
       "name": "io.modelcontextprotocol.anonymous/test-claude-migration-server",
       "description": "A test server to verify the new migration and API endpoints work correctly",
       "status": "active",
       "repository": {
         "url": "https://github.com/example/test-claude-migration-server",
         "source": "github",
         "id": "example/test-claude-migration-server"
       },
       "version": "1.0.0",
       "_meta": {
         "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
           "serverId": "102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352",
           "versionId": "48c9cd55-7bc4-4ac2-896e-59e81eb653e4",
           "published_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00",
           "updated_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00",
           "is_latest": true
         }
       }
     }

⏺ Bash(curl -s "http://localhost:8080/v0/servers/102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352/versions" | jq '.')
  ⎿  {                                                                                                 
       "servers": [
         {
           "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json",
           "name": "io.modelcontextprotocol.anonymous/test-claude-migration-server",
           "description": "A test server to verify the new migration and API endpoints work correctly",
           "status": "active",
           "repository": {
             "url": "https://github.com/example/test-claude-migration-server",
             "source": "github",
             "id": "example/test-claude-migration-server"
           },
           "version": "1.0.0",
           "_meta": {
             "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
               "serverId": "102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352",
               "versionId": "48c9cd55-7bc4-4ac2-896e-59e81eb653e4",
               "published_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00",
               "updated_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00",
               "is_latest": true
             }
           }
         }
       ],
       "metadata": {
         "count": 1
       }
     }
```

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Preeti Dewani <preetidewani1990@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: adam jones <adamj+git@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Jones <adamj@anthropic.com>
2025-09-21 15:00:09 +03:00
adam jones
ef4607720d
Fix _meta field format for MCP spec compliance (#367)
## Summary

Updates the `_meta` field structure to be compliant with the MCP
specification by using proper `prefix/name` format for vendor
extensions.

### Changes

- **Registry metadata**: `io.modelcontextprotocol.registry` →
`io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official`
- **Publisher metadata**: `publisher` →
`io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided`
- **Database migration**: Updates indexes to use new field paths
- **Updated all code**: Service layer, validators, tests, and seed data

### Format Before
```json
{
  "_meta": {
    "publisher": { "license": "MIT" },
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry": { "id": "...", "is_latest": true }
  }
}
```

### Format After
```json
{
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided": { "license": "MIT" },
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": { "id": "...", "is_latest": true }
  }
}
```

This resolves the naming collision with the planned top-level
`publisher` field and ensures compliance with MCP specification
requirements.

Fixes #356
2025-09-08 11:40:04 -07:00
adam jones
218b0b422d
Implement flattened _meta format for server extensions (#331)
## Summary

This PR implements the flattened `_meta` format for server extensions as
discussed in #284, replacing the confusing wrapper format with a clean
single-file approach.

**Before (wrapper format):**
```json
{
  "server": { "name": "my-server", "description": "..." },
  "x-publisher": { "build_info": "..." },
  "x-io.modelcontextprotocol.registry": { "id": "...", "published_at": "..." }
}
```

**After (flattened format):**
```json
{
  "name": "my-server",
  "description": "...",
  "_meta": {
    "publisher": { "build_info": "..." },
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry": { "id": "...", "published_at": "..." }
  }
}
```

## Key Changes

- **Flattened Format**: Single `ServerJSON` file with structured `_meta`
field
- **Better DX**: Publishers maintain one file instead of separate
server.json + extensions.json
- **MCP Compliance**: Uses standard `_meta` mechanism instead of `x-*`
prefixes
- **Simplified Database**: PostgreSQL now uses simple `id, value` table
structure
- **Type Safety**: Structured `ServerMeta` with known extension fields

## Database Migration

Added migration `003_simplify_to_key_value.sql` that drops the complex
relational structure and creates a simple key-value table. This
significantly simplifies database management.

## Testing

- All core tests passing (validators, service layer)
- Schema validation working for all 10 examples
- Seed data successfully migrated (396 entries)
- Publishing functionality verified

Fixes #284
2025-09-01 19:27:23 +01:00
Radoslav Dimitrov
8d7e471fd3
Allow for vendor extensions on servers (#298)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
This PR serves as a placeholder and brings together all of the changes
related to supporting vendor extensions passed through the API. The idea
is to have a single place to track and review the work as it comes
together (even if it’s still a bit of a work in progress).

**The changes in this PR cover:**
* Updates on the data model
* Updates on both databases (in-memory and postgresql), added a new
table to PSQL for tracking the extensions leaving the server table only
for the clean server.json properties
* Updates the seed.json file (thus the big line change)
* Adds a seed-migrate tool to help migrating an existing seed file to
the new format
* Updates the seed import mechanism to support this
* Updates the existing tests - unit, integration and validation tests
* Adds the publish handler to the OpenAPI spec (it was missing)
* Fixes linting errors
* Updates on the API side on (publish, list, get) to support the new
format of `ServerResponse` -
```
{
  "server": {},
  "x-io.modelcontextprotocol.registry": {}, /*not available for publish since this gets populated by the registry*/
  "x-publisher": {}
}
```

## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
Motivated by the discussions in:
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/discussions/284

## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
Locally and by running all of the tests

## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->
Yes, it changes both the API and the format of the seed file
 
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update

---

Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com>
Co-authored-by: adam jones <domdomegg+git@gmail.com>
2025-08-23 09:59:03 +01:00
adam jones
ebaf4c9c99
Refactor database implementation to use PostgreSQL instead of MongoDB (#289)
Fixes #228

## Motivation and Context

See #19

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Run locally
- Run in docker compose
- Run infra in minikube
- Unit and integration tests all passing :)

## Breaking Changes

Yes: users will not be able to access any data they used to have in
custom mongodb. We are accepting this breaking change, given the
registry is in experimental development status.

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context

I have not implemented connection pooling support for simplicity, and
because cloudnative-pg already provides built-in connection pooling with
pgBouncer so if we want it later we can switch to this endpoint easily.
2025-08-22 01:40:28 +01:00