modelcontextprotocol/registry
Watch
1
0
Fork
You've already forked registry
 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
420 commits 1 branch 36 tags 50 MiB
Commit graph registry/docs/reference/cli
Author SHA1 Message Date
Joel Verhagen
88c2e1be16
 		Enable Google KMS and Azure Key Vault for publisher login tool (#696) 
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->

## Motivation and Context

This allows the private key used for DNS or HTTP based authentication to
be stored securely in a cloud key management system. These services
often provide HSM storage which makes it very hard to leak the private
key.

The full context is described in my design document here:

https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/482#issuecomment-3437117171

## How Has This Been Tested?

I have tested it against PROD using an Ed25519 key stored in Google KMS.
I have added unit tests. I have tested both ECDSA P-384 and Ed25519 with
Az KV and Google KMS against a locally running server.

## Breaking Changes

None intended.

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: adam jones <domdomegg+git@gmail.com>
 2025-10-29 13:23:20 +00:00
Joel Verhagen
6c0f085708
 		Add support for ECDSA P-384 (#685) 
## Motivation and Context

See
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/482#issuecomment-3436993157
for full details.

This adds ECDSA P-384 (a popular NIST approved curve) in addition to
Ed25519.

## How Has This Been Tested?

I have tested with a local deployment against `mcp.joelverhagen.com`.
Also, I have added significant tests.

## Breaking Changes

None. (hopefully)

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update

## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed

## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->

@domdomegg and I spoke a bit about this on Discord:
https://discord.com/channels/1358869848138059966/1369487942862504016/1423710918180606052

---------

Co-authored-by: adam jones <domdomegg+git@gmail.com>
 2025-10-24 12:02:33 -06:00
Tadas Antanavicius
56e8b4879b
 		Introduce serverId, rename id to versionId (#465) 
Wielded Claude Code to do this; across many iterations and have reviewed
all the code + largely rewritten the PR commentary here.

This PR implements the server ID consistency changes from
[#396](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/396). Our
goal is to:
- Rename `id` to `versionId` to make it clear that it is the ID for a
specific version, not a server
- Introduce `serverId` as a net new concept. This will be 1:1 with
`name`. While not strictly necessary (we could just use name as a PK),
the convention of having a UUID as an ID on our objects is just a
helpful subjective architecture decision. Plus also leaves open the door
to reconsidering the "should we allow renames" question.

## Key Changes

### 🗄️ Database Schema Changes
- **Renamed**: `id` column → `version_id` (unique identifier for each
server version)

### 📋 Metadata Structure Updates
- **JSON Schema**: Updated
`_meta.io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official` to include:
  - `serverId`: Consistent ID across all versions of a server
  - `versionId`: Unique ID for this specific version (renamed from `id`)

### 🔧 API Endpoint Updates
- **New endpoint structure**: Changed from version-ID-based to
server-ID-based URLs:
  - `GET /v0/servers/{server_id}` - Get latest version of server
  - `GET /v0/servers/{server_id}?version=X.X.X` - Get specific version  
- `GET /v0/servers/{server_id}/versions` - List all versions of a server
  - `PUT /v0/servers/{server_id}?version=X.X.X` - Edit specific version
- **Consistent URL patterns**: All server endpoints now use `server_id`
as the primary identifier
 
### Database Migration Strategy
The migration (`005_add_server_id_rename_version_id.sql`):
1. Adds new `version_id` column  
2. Generates deterministic UUIDs for servers with the same name
3. Updates JSON metadata to add `serverId` and rename `id` to
`versionId`
4. Copies existing `id` values to `version_id` column
5. Drops old `id` column and makes `version_id` the new primary key

## Testing

Besides of course automated tests passing, I:
1. Set up my local db with the pre-005-migration state, imported all the
production data
2. Ran the migration
3. Spot checked some diffs of the data that resulted --

```json
// before
{
  "name": "io.github.ruvnet/ruv-swarm",
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
      "id": "0a9cda7f-2b73-4839-844b-6582f335de42",
      "is_latest": false,
      "updated_at": "2025-09-10T17:21:34.92137012Z",
      "published_at": "2025-09-10T17:15:32.69690433Z"
    }
  },
  "version": "1.0.18",
  "repository": {
    "url": "",
    "source": ""
  },
  "description": "Neural network swarm orchestration with WebAssembly acceleration and MCP integration"
}

// after
{
  "name": "io.github.ruvnet/ruv-swarm",
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
      "serverId": "e8538952-96af-4a33-9e31-7fbed012521e",
      "is_latest": false,
      "versionId": "0a9cda7f-2b73-4839-844b-6582f335de42",
      "updated_at": "2025-09-10T17:21:34.92137012Z",
      "published_at": "2025-09-10T17:15:32.69690433Z"
    }
  },
  "version": "1.0.18",
  "repository": {
    "url": "",
    "source": ""
  },
  "description": "Neural network swarm orchestration with WebAssembly acceleration and MCP integration"
}

```

Servers that have multiple versions stayed consistent in their
`serverId`:

```json
// First version
{
  "name": "app.getdialer/dialer",
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
      "serverId": "80f08bdb-f3e4-4f19-b072-1676ae49b663",
      "is_latest": false,
      "versionId": "04f25b17-331d-48d7-b08b-37baece208a7",
      "updated_at": "2025-09-09T00:16:49.162620072Z",
      "published_at": "2025-09-08T23:47:09.452137971Z"
    }
  },
  "status": "active",
  "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json",
  "remotes": [
    {
      "url": "https://getdialer.app/mcp",
      "type": "streamable-http"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://getdialer.app/sse",
      "type": "sse"
    }
  ],
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "repository": {
    "url": "",
    "source": ""
  },
  "description": "An MCP server that provides your you make outbound phone calls using your own phone number"
}

// Second version
{
  "name": "app.getdialer/dialer",
  "_meta": {
    "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
      "serverId": "80f08bdb-f3e4-4f19-b072-1676ae49b663",
      "is_latest": true,
      "versionId": "faa26cb9-3aad-415e-aece-f715fff5fe5e",
      "updated_at": "2025-09-09T00:16:49.107842808Z",
      "published_at": "2025-09-09T00:16:49.107842808Z"
    }
  },
  "status": "active",
  "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json",
  "remotes": [
    {
      "url": "https://getdialer.app/mcp",
      "type": "streamable-http"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://getdialer.app/sse",
      "type": "sse"
    }
  ],
  "version": "1.0.1",
  "repository": {
    "url": "",
    "source": ""
  },
  "description": "An MCP server that provides lets you make outbound phone calls using your own phone number"
}
```

And I also tried publishing a test server anew; looked good:

```bash
⏺ Bash(curl -s "http://localhost:8080/v0/servers/102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352" | jq '.')
  ⎿  {                                                                                             
       "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json",
       "name": "io.modelcontextprotocol.anonymous/test-claude-migration-server",
       "description": "A test server to verify the new migration and API endpoints work correctly",
       "status": "active",
       "repository": {
         "url": "https://github.com/example/test-claude-migration-server",
         "source": "github",
         "id": "example/test-claude-migration-server"
       },
       "version": "1.0.0",
       "_meta": {
         "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
           "serverId": "102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352",
           "versionId": "48c9cd55-7bc4-4ac2-896e-59e81eb653e4",
           "published_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00",
           "updated_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00",
           "is_latest": true
         }
       }
     }

⏺ Bash(curl -s "http://localhost:8080/v0/servers/102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352/versions" | jq '.')
  ⎿  {                                                                                                 
       "servers": [
         {
           "$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-07-09/server.schema.json",
           "name": "io.modelcontextprotocol.anonymous/test-claude-migration-server",
           "description": "A test server to verify the new migration and API endpoints work correctly",
           "status": "active",
           "repository": {
             "url": "https://github.com/example/test-claude-migration-server",
             "source": "github",
             "id": "example/test-claude-migration-server"
           },
           "version": "1.0.0",
           "_meta": {
             "io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/official": {
               "serverId": "102dc4e4-6ca8-40e6-aa11-cd45763d3352",
               "versionId": "48c9cd55-7bc4-4ac2-896e-59e81eb653e4",
               "published_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00",
               "updated_at": "2025-09-12T18:33:23.264203-07:00",
               "is_latest": true
             }
           }
         }
       ],
       "metadata": {
         "count": 1
       }
     }
```

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Preeti Dewani <preetidewani1990@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: adam jones <adamj+git@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Jones <adamj@anthropic.com>
 2025-09-21 15:00:09 +03:00
adam jones
d43d0bfeef
 		docs: fix DNS authentication to use root domain instead of _mcp-registry subdomain (#388) 
Fixes #385

Updates DNS authentication documentation to correctly specify that TXT
records should be placed at the root domain (e.g., `example.com`) rather
than the `_mcp-registry` subdomain.

The implementation correctly looks up TXT records at the root domain,
but the documentation incorrectly instructed users to create records at
`_mcp-registry.<domain>`. This mismatch was causing authentication
failures.

## Why use root domain instead of subdomain?

The root domain approach is clearer: if you want to publish to
`com.example/my-server`, you authenticate with `example.com`, not
`_mcp-registry.example.com`.

It also aligns with other TXT DNS standards, e.g. SPF. (That said, there
are other DNS standards that use subdomains e.g. DKIM 🤷)

## Changes
- Updated publish-server.md to remove `_mcp-registry.` prefix from DNS
examples
- Updated CLI commands reference documentation  
- Updated namespacing explanation documentation
 2025-09-09 14:42:37 +03:00
Rui Chen
0745bb91ce
 		docs: add homebrew installation notes for mcp-publisher (#384) 
- https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/236635
- https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/358
- https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/mcp-publisher

---------

Signed-off-by: Rui Chen <rui@chenrui.dev>
Co-authored-by: Adam Jones <adamj@anthropic.com>
 2025-09-08 21:46:36 -07:00
adam jones
f975e68cf2
 		Clean up schema by simplifying version structure (#379) 
## Summary

Simplified the schema structure by:
- Replacing `version_detail.version` with direct `version` field  
- Removing unused `release_date` field from seed data
- Updating all API types, models, and tests to match new structure
- Maintaining backwards compatibility in API responses

This change makes the schema more intuitive and reduces nesting depth.
 2025-09-08 14:32:59 -07:00
adam jones
2e7108d366
 		Big docs tidy up in preparation for launch (#364) 
## Motivation and Context
Docs currently don't have very clear organisation, and don't explain
core flows.

This fixes #89 (although we still might want to push these to
`https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/`), based on the plan there.

One minor change from that plan is that I merged tutorials and guides,
because they ended up basically being duplicates which I thought would
be annoying for us to keep in sync. Additionally in the Diátaxis
framework, tutorials and guides are separated by whether they are
focused on acquisition of skills (e.g. in a learning environment) or
application of skills (e.g. in a work environment). I expect the
registry to be something that will be used occasionally in a work
environment, rather than a fundamental 'learnable' skill so I think it's
reasonable not to have tutorials and fold these into guides.

## How Has This Been Tested?
- Read through all these updated docs
- Unit and integration tests (that previously used examples.md and use
the schema) working
- Ran `npx markdown-link-check .` to check all the links work

## Breaking Changes
Links to old docs will break, but I don't think there are any. All
internal links have been checked and updated.

## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
 2025-09-07 10:44:42 +01:00