- Go 92.9%
- PLpgSQL 3.1%
- HTML 1.9%
- Shell 1.6%
- Makefile 0.5%
| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
## Summary DNS auth users have repeatedly hit two failure modes that both produce the same opaque "Ed25519 signature verification failed" error, making them indistinguishable to debug. This PR makes both diagnosable end-to-end without changing the auth protocol or any successful path. The two recurring failure modes: 1. **Wrong placement** — TXT record put under a selector (`_mcp-auth.<domain>` or `_mcp-registry.<domain>`) instead of the apex. DKIM-style intuition, but MCP DNS auth uses SPF-style apex placement. See #385 (PR #388 fixed the docs but the failure recurred), #1103, #1126. 2. **Stale apex record** — old TXT record left behind after a key rotation, silently tried first and rejected. ## Changes **`internal/api/handlers/v0/auth/dns.go`** — when the apex has no `v=MCPv1` record, probe `_mcp-auth.<domain>` and `_mcp-registry.<domain>` in parallel (2s individual timeout). If a record is found there, return a targeted error pointing the user at the apex. Costs zero extra DNS work in the success path. **`internal/api/handlers/v0/auth/common.go`** — when verification fails against records that *are* present, include short fingerprints of every key the registry tried (`ed25519:YJLsHFhu`-style 8-char prefix). A new `ErrSignatureMismatch` sentinel keeps structural errors (wrong signature size, unsupported algorithm) passing through unchanged via `errors.Is`, so existing assertions on those messages still hold. **`docs/modelcontextprotocol-io/authentication.mdx`** — anti-pattern `<Warning>` callout in the DNS section explicitly warning against selector placement and stale records. **Tests** — two new tests: - `TestDNSAuthHandler_WrongSelectorProbe` — verifies the probe surfaces records found at `_mcp-auth.` / `_mcp-registry.` and falls through to the standard error when nothing is found anywhere - `TestDNSAuthHandler_StaleKeyFingerprintInError` — verifies the fingerprint hint appears in the failure message for #1126's exact scenario One existing test assertion was updated from a generic `"signature verification failed"` substring to the more specific `"invalid signature size for ECDSA P-384"` it should always have been asserting; the new sentinel-based logic surfaces structural errors verbatim. ## Test plan - [x] `make lint` — clean - [x] `make test-unit` — all auth tests pass (existing + 2 new) - [x] Verified existing single-key and multi-key paths preserve their original (more specific) error messages where they were already specific - [ ] Reviewer to sanity-check the docs callout renders well in the Mintlify theme ## Out of scope The publisher-side preflight DNS check (cross-link in #845) is intentionally **not** in this PR — that belongs in the broader CLI UX work tracked by #845. Refs #845, #385, #1103 Fixes #1126 --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
| .githooks | ||
| .github | ||
| .vscode | ||
| cmd | ||
| data | ||
| deploy | ||
| docs | ||
| internal | ||
| pkg | ||
| scripts | ||
| tests/integration | ||
| tools | ||
| .env.example | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .golangci.yml | ||
| .goreleaser.yaml | ||
| .ko.dockerignore | ||
| .ko.yaml | ||
| CHANGES.md | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| complete.md | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| docker-compose.yml | ||
| go.mod | ||
| go.sum | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| Makefile | ||
| README.md | ||
| SECURITY.md | ||
MCP Registry
The MCP registry provides MCP clients with a list of MCP servers, like an app store for MCP servers.
📤 Publish my MCP server | ⚡️ Live API docs | 👀 Ecosystem vision | 📖 Full documentation
Development Status
2025-10-24 update: The Registry API has entered an API freeze (v0.1) 🎉. For the next month or more, the API will remain stable with no breaking changes, allowing integrators to confidently implement support. This freeze applies to v0.1 while development continues on v0. We'll use this period to validate the API in real-world integrations and gather feedback to shape v1 for general availability. Thank you to everyone for your contributions and patience—your involvement has been key to getting us here!
2025-09-08 update: The registry has launched in preview 🎉 (announcement blog post). While the system is now more stable, this is still a preview release and breaking changes or data resets may occur. A general availability (GA) release will follow later. We'd love your feedback in GitHub discussions or in the #registry-dev Discord (joining details here).
Current key maintainers:
- Adam Jones (Anthropic) @domdomegg
- Tadas Antanavicius (PulseMCP) @tadasant
- Toby Padilla (GitHub) @toby
- Radoslav (Rado) Dimitrov (Stacklok) @rdimitrov
Contributing
We use multiple channels for collaboration - see modelcontextprotocol.io/community/communication.
Often (but not always) ideas flow through this pipeline:
- Discord - Real-time community discussions
- Discussions - Propose and discuss product/technical requirements
- Issues - Track well-scoped technical work
- Pull Requests - Contribute work towards issues
Quick start:
Pre-requisites
- Docker
- Go 1.24.x
- ko - Container image builder for Go (installation instructions)
- golangci-lint v2.4.0
Running the server
# Start full development environment
make dev-compose
This starts the registry at localhost:8080 with PostgreSQL. The database uses ephemeral storage and is reset each time you restart the containers, ensuring a clean state for development and testing.
Note: The registry uses ko to build container images. The make dev-compose command automatically builds the registry image with ko and loads it into your local Docker daemon before starting the services.
By default, the registry seeds from the production API with a filtered subset of servers (to keep startup fast). This ensures your local environment mirrors production behavior and all seed data passes validation. For offline development you can seed from a file without validation with MCP_REGISTRY_SEED_FROM=data/seed.json MCP_REGISTRY_ENABLE_REGISTRY_VALIDATION=false make dev-compose.
The setup can be configured with environment variables in docker-compose.yml - see .env.example for a reference.
Alternative: Running a pre-built Docker image
Pre-built Docker images are automatically published to GitHub Container Registry. Note that the image does not bundle PostgreSQL, so you need to run your own and point the registry at it via MCP_REGISTRY_DATABASE_URL (see docker-compose.yml for a working example):
# Run latest stable release
docker run -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/modelcontextprotocol/registry:latest
# Run latest from main branch (continuous deployment)
docker run -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/modelcontextprotocol/registry:main
# Run specific release version
docker run -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/modelcontextprotocol/registry:v1.0.0
# Run development build from main branch
docker run -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/modelcontextprotocol/registry:main-20250906-abc123d
Available tags:
- Releases:
latest,v1.0.0,v1.1.0, etc. - Continuous:
main(latest main branch build) - Development:
main-<date>-<sha>(specific commit builds)
Publishing a server
To publish a server, we've built a simple CLI. You can use it with:
# Build the latest CLI
make publisher
# Use it!
./bin/mcp-publisher --help
See the publisher guide for more details.
Other commands
# Run lint, unit tests and integration tests
make check
There are also a few more helpful commands for development. Run make help to learn more, or look in Makefile.
Architecture
Project Structure
├── cmd/ # Application entry points
│ └── publisher/ # Server publishing tool
├── data/ # Seed data
├── deploy/ # Deployment configuration (Pulumi)
├── docs/ # Documentation
├── internal/ # Private application code
│ ├── api/ # HTTP handlers and routing
│ ├── auth/ # Authentication (GitHub OAuth, JWT, namespace blocking)
│ ├── config/ # Configuration management
│ ├── database/ # Data persistence (PostgreSQL)
│ ├── service/ # Business logic
│ ├── telemetry/ # Metrics and monitoring
│ └── validators/ # Input validation
├── pkg/ # Public packages
│ ├── api/ # API types and structures
│ │ └── v0/ # Version 0 API types
│ └── model/ # Data models for server.json
├── scripts/ # Development and testing scripts
├── tests/ # Integration tests
└── tools/ # CLI tools and utilities
└── validate-*.sh # Schema validation tools
Authentication
Publishing supports multiple authentication methods:
- GitHub OAuth - For publishing by logging into GitHub
- GitHub OIDC - For publishing from GitHub Actions
- DNS verification - For proving ownership of a domain and its subdomains
- HTTP verification - For proving ownership of a domain
The registry validates namespace ownership when publishing. E.g. to publish...:
io.github.domdomegg/my-cool-mcpyou must login to GitHub asdomdomegg, or be in a GitHub Action on domdomegg's reposme.adamjones/my-cool-mcpyou must prove ownership ofadamjones.mevia DNS or HTTP challenge
Community Projects
Check out community projects to explore notable registry-related work created by the community.
More documentation
See the documentation for more details if your question has not been answered here!