## Motivation and Context
Final step of SEP-2322 (modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol#2322) for the 2026-07-28 MCP spec release.
The client so far only recognized `input_required` results by raising `InputRequiredError`; this adds the resume loop,
mirroring the Python SDK's high-level `Client` driver and the TypeScript SDK's `runInputRequiredDriver`.
- The driver answers embedded requests with the handlers already registered through `on_elicitation`,
`on_sampling`, and the new `on_roots`. There is no second registration path: a server can ask for input two
ways, as a real request mid-call and as an entry in an `input_required` result, and one registration covers
both. This follows the TypeScript driver, which dispatches "to the client's already-registered handlers
(elicitation, sampling, roots - one generic engine, no per-feature API)".
- `on_elicitation` and `on_sampling` no longer refuse a transport without `on_server_request`. They record
the handler either way and wire it to the transport only when it can carry server-to-client requests. Refusing
would have locked stdio clients, and every 2026-07-28 connection, out of the only route the spec leaves:
the modern lifecycle forbids server-to-client requests, so an embedded request is how it asks.
- `MCP::Client.new` gains `input_required_max_rounds:` (default 10, the TypeScript and Python default).
- Once a handler is registered, `call_tool`, `get_prompt`, and `read_resource` resume automatically:
each `inputRequests` entry is fulfilled by the matching handler and the ORIGINAL request is re-issued with
`inputResponses` under the same keys plus the byte-exact echoed `requestState`, on a fresh JSON-RPC id per leg
(modern envelope stamping happens in the transports per send, so every leg carries the SEP-2575 triple).
A `requestState`-only result (load shedding) retries after an exponential backoff from 50ms to a 250ms cap,
matching the Python SDK; every leg counts against the round cap, whose exhaustion raises `InputRequiredError`
carrying the last result.
- A requested kind without a matching handler falls back to the manual path by raising `InputRequiredError`,
and clients with no handlers keep the exact pre-existing behavior. For manual driving,
`call_tool` / `get_prompt` / `read_resource` gain `input_responses:` and `request_state:` keyword arguments
that ride at the params top level. Non-MRTR methods such as `tools/list` keep raising unconditionally.
The conformance client rides the same change: it derives its lifecycle from the wire version the harness names per run
(`MCP_CONFORMANCE_PROTOCOL_VERSION`), connecting with `mode: :modern` for the 2026 draft and keeping the pinned legacy
handshake through 2025-11-25, retrying a modern connect once when the server rejects the first request with `-32022`
naming its supported versions. New scenario branches drive `sep-2322-client-request-state` through this driver
(an accepting `on_elicitation` handler plus the four `test_mrtr_*` tools), `request-metadata`, both SEP-2243 header
scenarios, and `json-schema-ref-no-deref`. The expected-failures baseline drops the six scenarios this stack resolves,
leaving only the not-scored extensions and the post-anchor `json-schema-2020-12-preservation`.
Verified end-to-end over stdio: a modern connection (`connect(mode: :modern)` with declared form-elicitation capability)
against a server whose tool returns `InputRequiredResult` under `RequestStateSecurity` sealing completes in two legs with
the handler supplying the answer, and a handler-less client receives `InputRequiredError` with the sealed opaque state.
Part of #382.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New tests in `test/mcp/client_test.rb` (Mocha sequenced transports) cover: the two-leg happy path asserting preserved original params,
key-matched `inputResponses`, byte-exact `requestState` echo, and a fresh id per leg; the exponential backoff sequence for
`requestState`-only legs (stubbed `sleep`); round-cap exhaustion raising `InputRequiredError` with the last state; the unhandled-kind
fallback; the manual `input_responses:`/`request_state:` keyword arguments; and the `prompts/get` driver path. The existing SEP-2322
recognition tests pin the no-handler behavior unchanged.
Three tests cover the shared-registration design specifically: the driver resolving an embedded request on a transport that
has no `on_server_request` at all, an `on_roots` handler answering an embedded `roots/list`, and `on_elicitation` and
`on_sampling` accepting a registration on such a transport rather than raising, which replaces the two tests that pinned
the old refusal.
`bundle exec rake` (tests, RuboCop, and conformance baseline) passes, plus the stdio end-to-end script described above.
With the separate SEP-2243 mirroring change applied alongside, every scored scenario of the frozen 2026-07-28 client leg passes
(`sep-2322-client-request-state` 5/5, `request-metadata` 5/5 with no version-retry warning, `http-custom-headers` 18/18,
`http-invalid-tool-headers` 11/11), and the `--requirements` client legs at both revisions report failures only
in not-scored scenarios. The full conformance task passes its baseline check on both legs.
## Breaking Changes
`on_elicitation` and `on_sampling` no longer raise `ArgumentError` on a transport without `on_server_request`; they
register the handler for the `input_required` route instead. Code that relied on the refusal to detect an unsuitable
transport needs another check. Everything else is additive: the new keyword arguments default to `nil`, and with no
handler registered every code path is identical to before.
## Motivation and Context
The `json-schema-2020-12-preservation` client scenario (SEP-1613, SEP-2106; not scored for
2026-07-28, as it was added after the requirements anchor) failed only because the conformance client
had no branch for it: an unknown scenario aborts after connecting, so the harness never observed
a `tools/list` nor the schema echo it diffs.
The client itself already preserves the vocabulary the scenario checks (`$schema`, `$defs` with
`$anchor`, `$ref`, `allOf`/`anyOf`, `if`/`then`/`else`, `additionalProperties`):
`Client::Tool#input_schema` is the parsed `tools/list` response untouched, with no dereferencing,
validation-time rewriting, or keyword stripping, the same fixture-echo approach
the TypeScript and Python conformance clients take. The new branch lists the tools and echoes
the focal tool's observed `inputSchema` verbatim through `json_schema_echo`,
and the expected-failures entry is removed.
## How Has This Been Tested?
The scenario passes 9/9 at its default 2025-11-25 wire. On top of the modern-lifecycle client selection
(the SEP-2322 driver branch) it also passes 9/9 at `--spec-version 2026-07-28`, where the SEP-2106 keyword checks
are failure-gated instead of skipped. `bundle exec rake` is green, with the conformance task passing its baseline check
on both legs, and RuboCop reports no offenses.
## Breaking Changes
None. The change is confined to the conformance client and its baseline; the shipped gem is untouched.
## Motivation and Context
The npm `latest` dist-tag of `@modelcontextprotocol/conformance` points at 0.1.16, the old 0.1 line,
while the 2026-07-28 requirement revisions and the frozen-requirements framework live in the 0.2.0 alpha line
(`alpha` currently resolves 0.2.0-alpha.11). The runners invoked the bare package name, so `rake conformance`
and the conformance CI job resolve whatever `latest` points at: a fresh machine silently downgrades to
the old suite while a warm npx cache may keep serving a newer one, and the suite actually in use depends
on the environment. Pinning the `alpha` dist-tag puts every run on the line the frozen conformance requirements
are anchored to (0.2.0-alpha.10, published 2026-07-27).
Running the real alpha suite surfaced the actual client-leg state, so the expected-failures baseline is
updated to match: `initialize` now passes (the harness accepts 2026-07-28, fulfilling the TODO on the old entry),
and the scenarios pending client-side work are recorded with their reasons: the 2026-07-28 stateless lifecycle
and the SEP-2322 MRTR driver, SEP-2243 custom-header mirroring, client-side JSON Schema preservation,
the DPoP and WIF authorization extensions, and one `auth/authorization-server-migration` check added to
the suite after the alpha.10 anchor.
The manual `npx` examples in `conformance/README.md` carry the same pin so local reproduction runs
the same suite as the rake task.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`npx --yes @modelcontextprotocol/conformance@alpha --version` resolves 0.2.0-alpha.11,
and `bundle exec rake conformance` passes the baseline check on both legs: the server leg reports 73 passed with 0 failed
and no expected failures, and the client leg fails exactly the scenarios the baseline records.
## Breaking Changes
None. The change is confined to the conformance tooling; the shipped gem is untouched.
## Motivation and Context
Clients that require MCP 2026-07-28, such as ChatGPT, reject connections because the SDK
does not advertise that version: `Server#init` answers a 2026-07-28 request with 2025-11-25,
the Streamable HTTP transport 400s an `MCP-Protocol-Version: 2026-07-28` header,
and `server/discover` omits the version from `supportedVersions`.
Making 2026-07-28 the latest entry in `SUPPORTED_STABLE_PROTOCOL_VERSIONS` fixes all three at once,
since they all read that list. The version now serves both lifecycles of the SEP-2575 dual-era model:
negotiable through the legacy `initialize` handshake, and simultaneously the version of
the per-request modern lifecycle.
Parts of the 2026-07-28 feature set remain unimplemented, such as the stateless modern lifecycle
over the transports, and are being built separately. This change deliberately limits itself to
the version bump, focusing first on eliminating the connection errors that 2026-07-28 clients hit.
Known follow-up: the in-progress modern HTTP path routes requests to the sessionless modern lifecycle
when the header version is absent from `SUPPORTED_STABLE_PROTOCOL_VERSIONS`, so that routing predicate
needs rework on top of this change.
Closes#474
## How Has This Been Tested?
New regression tests: `initialize` with `protocolVersion: "2026-07-28"` echoes it back (`server_test.rb`),
a follow-up POST with `MCP-Protocol-Version: 2026-07-28` passes header validation
(`streamable_http_transport_test.rb`), and `Configuration.new(protocol_version: "2026-07-28")` is accepted
(`configuration_test.rb`).
`bundle exec rake test` passes (1454 runs, 0 failures). The conformance server suite passes 30/30.
The client `initialize` scenario is added to the expected-failures baseline: the conformance framework pins
the client's requested version to 2025-11-25 and does not accept 2026-07-28 yet; the entry carries a TODO
to remove it when the framework catches up.
## Breaking Changes
Servers that do not pin `configuration.protocol_version` now answer version negotiation fallbacks
and default client requests with 2026-07-28 instead of 2025-11-25. 2025-11-25 remains fully supported
and negotiable; clients that request it are unaffected.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP Enterprise Managed Authorization extension (SEP-990, modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol#990,
accepted/final, published in the ext-auth repository) lets enterprise identity providers govern MCP authorization:
the client exchanges an IdP-issued ID token for an Identity Assertion Authorization Grant (ID-JAG) via
RFC 8693 token exchange at the IdP, then presents the ID-JAG to the MCP authorization server with
the RFC 7523 `jwt-bearer` grant, authenticating with `client_secret_basic`.
The `auth/cross-app-access-complete-flow` conformance scenario exercises the complete flow and previously failed
its two core checks (the Ruby client ran the authorization-code flow instead).
This mirrors the merged TypeScript SDK implementation (`requestJwtAuthorizationGrant` / `CrossAppAccessProvider` in
typescript-sdk; the Python SDK tracks the same work in the open python-sdk#1721), adapted to this SDK's provider design:
- New `MCP::Client::OAuth::IDJAGTokenExchange.request` performs the RFC 8693 exchange at the IdP token endpoint
(`subject_token_type` id_token, `requested_token_type` id-jag, `audience` = the MCP authorization server's issuer,
`resource` = the canonical MCP server URL) and validates that the response's `issued_token_type` is an ID-JAG
before returning the assertion. The ID-JAG itself is treated as opaque, as in the TypeScript SDK.
- New `MCP::Client::OAuth::CrossAppAccessProvider` declares `authorization_flow :jwt_bearer` and takes the assertion
from a callable (`call(audience:, resource:)`), so the common `IDJAGTokenExchange` case, enterprise secret stores,
and tests all plug in the same way (the TypeScript provider's assertion callback works identically).
The MCP AS credentials are stored as `client_secret_basic` client information.
- `Flow` dispatches `:jwt_bearer` alongside `:client_credentials`: discovery, issuer validation, and endpoint security checks
are shared with `run!`, then `run_jwt_bearer!` requests the assertion with the validated issuer as the audience and posts
the `jwt-bearer` grant through the existing `post_to_token_endpoint`.
- The conformance client builds a `CrossAppAccessProvider` when the harness injects `idp_id_token` (exchanging it at
`idp_token_endpoint` with `idp_client_id`, like the TypeScript and Python conformance clients),
and `auth/cross-app-access-complete-flow` is removed from `conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
- New `test/mcp/client/oauth/id_jag_token_exchange_test.rb` asserts the exact RFC 8693 form parameters on the wire
and the response validation: a non-ID-JAG `issued_token_type` is rejected, as are a missing `access_token`,
non-2xx responses, unparseable bodies, and non-object JSON.
- New `test/mcp/client/oauth/cross_app_access_provider_test.rb` covers the provider surface:
stored `client_secret_basic` credentials, the `:jwt_bearer` flow declaration, audience/resource passthrough to
the assertion callable, constructor validation (missing client_id, missing client_secret, non-callable assertion provider),
and storage delegation.
- New tests in `test/mcp/client/oauth/flow_test.rb` run the full grant against WebMock stubs: the token request carries
`grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer`, the assertion, the RFC 8707 `resource`, and HTTP Basic credentials,
with no DCR and no authorization-code machinery; the assertion callable receives the validated issuer as `audience`
and the canonical server URL as `resource`; an empty assertion aborts before the token endpoint is contacted.
## Breaking Changes
None. `IDJAGTokenExchange` and `CrossAppAccessProvider` are new, and the `Flow` dispatch only activates for providers
that declare `authorization_flow :jwt_bearer`.
## Motivation and Context
Resolves the `elicitation-sep1034-client-defaults` client conformance scenario
(SEP-1034, https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/issues/1034).
The Ruby HTTP client could not receive server-to-client requests at all:
it never opened the spec's standalone GET SSE listening stream, and SSE events that
were not responses were discarded. A server sending `elicitation/create` during a tools/call
(such as the conformance harness, which is built on the TypeScript SDK server)
either dropped the request silently or deadlocked the tool call waiting for an answer that
could never arrive.
This change adds three pieces:
### Server-to-client request dispatch
`MCP::Client::HTTP#on_server_request(method) { |params| ... }` registers a handler;
when a JSON-RPC request (a message with both `method` and `id`) arrives on any SSE stream,
the handler's return value is POSTed back to the server as the JSON-RPC `result`
(the server ACKs with 202 Accepted, per the transport spec).
Methods without a handler are answered with a `-32601` method-not-found error.
A handler may raise `MCP::Client::ServerRequestError` to answer with a specific JSON-RPC error code
(for example `-1` for a rejected sampling request, per the sampling spec),
mirroring the TypeScript SDK's `McpError` and the Python SDK's `ErrorData` return;
any other error is answered with a `-32603` internal error. In every case the server is not left waiting,
matching how the TypeScript and Python SDKs convert handler failures into JSON-RPC error responses.
### A standalone GET SSE listening stream
Registering a handler (once connected) opens the spec's listening stream on a background thread,
because servers deliver requests that are not tied to a client request on that stream -
the TypeScript SDK's `StreamableHTTPServerTransport` silently drops them when no GET stream is open.
Mirrors the TypeScript and Python SDK clients, which start listening right after the `initialize` handshake
without awaiting stream establishment. Reconnection semantics also follow both SDKs:
a gracefully closed stream is retried indefinitely after the server's `retry:` interval,
while consecutive connection failures (HTTP errors and idle read timeouts) stop the listener once
they reach the reconnection attempt cap, with a successful stream resetting the count;
a 405 stops immediately without retrying, since it is the spec's answer from a server that
offers no listening stream. The listening GET uses a 5-minute read timeout matching
the Python SDK's `sse_read_timeout` default. `close` terminates the thread.
### SEP-1034 defaults
`MCP::Client::Elicitation.apply_defaults` fills fields omitted from the elicitation content with
the `default` values declared in `requestedSchema` properties, never overwriting provided values
and skipping properties without a default. This follows the Python SDK, which applies defaults in
the elicitation callback; the TypeScript SDK's automatic `applyElicitationDefaults`
(gated on the `elicitation.form.applyDefaults` capability) is a possible follow-up.
`MCP::Client#on_elicitation` registers a handler for `elicitation/create` as a convenience.
The conformance client gains an `elicitation-sep1034-client-defaults` branch that connects with
`capabilities: { elicitation: {} }`, accepts the elicitation with defaults applied, and calls
the harness's `test_client_elicitation_defaults` tool; the scenario is removed from the expected failures baseline.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New unit tests covering: handler dispatch from a request's POST SSE stream with
the response body and 202 ACK verified, the `-32601` answer for unregistered methods,
the `-32603` answer for a raising handler, the custom-code answer when a handler raises
`ServerRequestError`, listener startup from both registration-after-connect and
connect-with-registered-handlers, listener shutdown after consecutive connection failures with
the count resetting after a successful stream and an immediate stop on 405,
and `apply_defaults` for all five SEP-1034 property types (string, integer, number, enum, boolean),
non-overwriting of provided values, omission of properties without defaults, and symbol-keyed schemas
## Breaking Changes
None. The listening stream and its background thread are created only when a server-request handler is registered;
clients that never call `on_server_request` / `on_elicitation` keep the existing single-request behavior.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP `io.modelcontextprotocol/oauth-client-credentials` extension
(SEP-1046, modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol#1046) specifies
two client authentication methods for the `client_credentials` grant:
`client_secret_basic` and the RECOMMENDED `private_key_jwt`
(RFC 7523 Section 2.2 JWT client assertion). The previous commit added
the grant with secret-based authentication; this adds the JWT method,
which is what the `auth/client-credentials-jwt` conformance scenario exercises.
This mirrors the merged implementations in the TypeScript SDK
(`PrivateKeyJwtProvider`, typescript-sdk#1157) and the Python SDK
(`PrivateKeyJWTOAuthProvider` / `SignedJWTParameters`, python-sdk#1663),
adapted to this SDK's provider design:
- New `MCP::Client::OAuth::JWTClientAssertion` builds the RFC 7523 compact
JWS with openssl, keeping the SDK free of a JWT gem dependency
(the TypeScript and Python SDKs use jose and PyJWT). Claims follow SEP-1046:
`iss` and `sub` carry the client_id, `aud` carries the authorization
server's issuer identifier, plus `exp` (300-second lifetime, matching both SDKs),
`iat`, and a unique `jti`. ES256 and RS256 are supported; ES256 signatures are
converted from OpenSSL's ASN.1 DER form to the raw 64-byte `r || s` encoding
JWS requires (RFC 7518 Section 3.4).
- `ClientCredentialsProvider` accepts
`token_endpoint_auth_method: "private_key_jwt"` with `private_key:`
(PEM string or `OpenSSL::PKey::PKey`) and a required `signing_algorithm:`
(no default, so an algorithm mismatch with the server's
`token_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported` fails loudly at construction;
both reference SDKs also take the algorithm explicitly).
The key stays on the provider and is never written to `storage`;
a throwaway assertion is signed at construction to fail fast on an unparseable key
or a key/algorithm mismatch.
- `Flow#post_to_token_endpoint` sends `client_assertion_type` and a freshly
signed `client_assertion` for `private_key_jwt`,
using the `ensure_issuer_matches!`-validated issuer as the audience,
and omits `client_id` from the body per SEP-1046
(identity travels in the assertion's claims).
- The conformance client builds a `private_key_jwt` provider
when the harness injects `private_key_pem`, defaulting the algorithm to
ES256 like the TypeScript and Python conformance clients,
and `auth/client-credentials-jwt` is removed from
`conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
Scope notes: only ES256 and RS256 are supported for now (the TypeScript and
Python SDKs accept whatever their JWT libraries support);
adding further algorithms is additive. There is also no injection point yet for
externally signed assertions (the TypeScript SDK's `StaticPrivateKeyJwtProvider` and
the Python SDK's `assertion_provider` callback cover KMS/HSM-held keys);
that is a separate follow-up.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New `test/mcp/client/oauth/jwt_client_assertion_test.rb` covers the JWS construction:
header and RFC 7523 claims, unpadded base64url segments,
ES256 signature round-trip verification (raw -> DER -> `OpenSSL::PKey::EC#verify`),
RS256 verification, PEM and parsed-key input, lifetime override, unique `jti` per assertion,
and rejection of unsupported algorithms, key/algorithm mismatches
(including a P-384 key with ES256), unparseable PEM, and public-only keys.
New tests in `test/mcp/client/oauth/client_credentials_provider_test.rb` cover
the provider surface: `private_key_jwt` construction, the key and
secret never reaching `client_information`, required `private_key` / `signing_algorithm`,
rejection of a simultaneous `client_secret`, fail-fast on key/algorithm mismatch,
and `client_assertion(audience:)` producing a JWT with the expected claims.
A new test in `test/mcp/client/oauth/flow_test.rb` runs the full grant against WebMock stubs
and asserts the token request carries `grant_type=client_credentials`,
the RFC 7523 `client_assertion_type`, an assertion whose `iss`/`sub` are the client_id
and whose `aud` is the issuer, the RFC 8707 `resource`, and neither `client_id` nor
any secret in the body or headers.
`bundle exec rake` passes; the `auth/client-credentials-jwt` conformance scenario
passes 7/7 checks and the baseline check passes with its expected-failure entry removed.
## Breaking Changes
None. `client_secret:` becomes optional on `ClientCredentialsProvider` only
in the signature; it is still required for the secret-based methods, and all
existing construction paths behave unchanged.
## Motivation and Context
Resolves the `sse-retry` client conformance scenario (SEP-1699,
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/issues/1699).
Per SEP-1699, a server may close a request's SSE stream right after a priming event
(an event carrying an `id:`) without delivering the response, expecting the client
to treat the graceful close like a network failure: wait the server-specified
`retry:` interval, then reconnect with an HTTP GET carrying `Last-Event-ID`
so the server can replay the pending response on the resumed stream.
The Ruby client previously read the entire SSE body to EOF and parsed it afterward,
so it had no notion of per-event state (`id:`, `retry:`) or reconnection,
and the scenario failed all three checks (graceful reconnect, retry timing, `Last-Event-ID`).
`MCP::Client::HTTP#send_request` now consumes responses incrementally
via Faraday's `on_data` streaming callback, feeding SSE chunks to `event_stream_parser`
as they arrive while buffering plain JSON bodies as before. A new internal `SSEStream`
tracks the last received event id, the `retry:` reconnection delay,
and the awaited JSON-RPC response; once the response arrives, a held-open stream is
abandoned via an internal control-flow exception since servers may never close it.
When a stream closes gracefully after a priming event but before the response,
the client sleeps for the `retry:` interval (default 1000ms when the server sent none),
then issues a GET with `Accept: text/event-stream`, the session headers, and `Last-Event-ID`,
for up to 2 attempts. The defaults match the Python SDK's `DEFAULT_RECONNECTION_DELAY_MS` and
`MAX_RECONNECTION_ATTEMPTS` (`streamable_http.py`); the TypeScript SDK's `StreamableHTTPClientTransport`
(`streamableHttp.ts`) likewise lets the `retry:` field override its backoff and reconnects only when
a priming event was received and no response has arrived.
The public behavior of `send_request` is unchanged: same return values, same error mapping,
and a stream that closes without a priming event still raises the "No valid JSON-RPC response found in SSE stream" error
without reconnecting. Because the previous implementation read `response.body` and therefore worked with any Faraday adapter,
a fallback keeps that compatibility: when nothing was parsed during streaming, the body is read from `response.body`
(adapters without `on_data` support, e.g. the Faraday test adapter) or from the buffered chunks
(Faraday < 2.1, which invokes `on_data` without `env`).
The conformance client gains an `sse-retry` branch that calls the harness's `test_reconnection` tool,
and the scenario is removed from the expected failures baseline.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New unit tests covering: reconnection with `Last-Event-ID` after a primed graceful close including the `retry:` wait,
the default 1000ms delay when `retry:` is absent, raising after the reconnection attempt cap with `Last-Event-ID`
advancing across attempts, no reconnection for unprimed streams, and the non-streaming fallbacks
(JSON and SSE responses through the Faraday test adapter, which ignores `on_data`, plus buffered SSE chunks
when `on_data` receives no `env`)
## Breaking Changes
None. The `send_request` contract is unchanged; SSE bodies are now parsed incrementally instead of after EOF,
and reconnection only activates when the server opts in by sending a priming event.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP 2025-03-26 authorization spec predates Protected Resource Metadata:
the MCP server itself acted as the authorization base URL, its RFC 8414 metadata was fetched from
the server origin, and the spec's "Fallbacks for Servers without Metadata Discovery" section
required clients to use the default endpoints `/authorize`, `/token`, and `/register` relative to
the authorization base URL when no metadata was published. Both the TypeScript SDK
(`discoverOAuthServerInfo` falls back to the server base URL on PRM failure; `startAuthorization` /
`executeTokenRequest` / `registerClient` default the endpoint paths) and the Python SDK
(`build_oauth_authorization_server_metadata_discovery_urls(None, ...)` plus the same endpoint defaults)
keep this as client-side backwards compatibility, and the `auth/2025-03-26-oauth-metadata-backcompat` and
`auth/2025-03-26-oauth-endpoint-fallback` conformance scenarios exercise it.
The Ruby flow previously raised as soon as PRM discovery failed, so both scenarios were
expected conformance failures. This change adds the same fallback:
- `Flow#locate_authorization_server` first attempts PRM discovery; on any discovery failure
(404s, network errors, malformed documents, matching the TypeScript and Python SDKs' broad fallback)
the MCP server's origin becomes the legacy authorization base URL. The Communication Security check
(HTTPS or loopback) still applies to that origin, and PRM documents that parse correctly keep
their strict shape validation.
- `Flow#authorization_server_metadata` fetches RFC 8414 metadata from the base URL.
On the legacy path the `issuer` byte-match is skipped: the 2025-03-26 spec predates that requirement,
and a pre-PRM server may host its OAuth endpoints under a path prefix whose `issuer` legitimately differs
from the discovery origin (neither reference SDK validates the issuer on this path). On the modern path
the byte-match is unchanged.
- When even the metadata document is absent, synthetic metadata carrying the legacy spec's default endpoints
is used, with PKCE S256 assumed (the legacy spec mandates PKCE; the TypeScript and Python SDKs hardcode S256
on this path too). Endpoint HTTPS checks still apply.
- `run!` and `refresh!` share the new discovery helpers, and both 2025-03-26 scenarios are removed from
`conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New tests in `test/mcp/client/oauth/flow_test.rb`:
- the metadata-backcompat shape: no PRM, AS metadata at the server origin with `/oauth`-prefixed endpoints
and a mismatched `issuer` completes the flow against those endpoints (no issuer error)
- the endpoint-fallback shape: no metadata at all registers, authorizes, and exchanges the code at `/register`,
`/authorize`, and `/token` on the origin, still sending `code_challenge` (S256) and `code_verifier`
- a remote plain-http origin is rejected as the legacy authorization base
- strict-mode regression: with PRM present, a mismatched `issuer` still aborts the flow
- a malformed PRM (top-level JSON array) now selects the legacy path instead of leaking a `TypeError`,
and surfaces a domain error when that path also dead-ends
Two existing tests that asserted PRM failure was terminal were updated to dead-end the legacy path explicitly,
preserving their original intent (single flow attempt, domain error type).
## Breaking Changes
None for spec-compliant 2025-06-18+ servers, whose PRM-based discovery and issuer validation are unchanged.
Servers that previously failed hard during PRM discovery now get one legacy discovery attempt before the flow errors,
which can only turn previously failing flows into working ones.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP authorization specification and SEP-1046 allow confidential clients to
obtain tokens through the OAuth 2.1 `client_credentials` grant: a machine-to-machine flow
with no user, no browser redirect, and no authorization code. The Ruby SDK
previously supported only the interactive authorization-code flow, so it could not
authenticate against a server that requires `client_credentials`. This makes
the `auth/client-credentials-basic` conformance scenario pass and is removed from
the expected failures list.
Following the TypeScript SDK (`ClientCredentialsProvider`) and the Python SDK
(`ClientCredentialsOAuthProvider`), the grant gets its own provider class rather than
overloading the authorization-code provider. The change adds:
- `MCP::Client::OAuth::ClientCredentialsProvider`, a dedicated provider
for the grant. `client_id` and `client_secret` are mandatory
(the grant is for confidential clients), `token_endpoint_auth_method` is
`client_secret_basic` (default) or `client_secret_post` -- `none` is
rejected because an unauthenticated `client_credentials` request is
meaningless. It has no redirect arguments, so a credentials-only
client never supplies the redirect URI / handlers that grant has no use for.
- `MCP::Client::OAuth::StorageBackedProvider`, an internal module that
shares the token / client-information persistence between the two provider classes
so `Flow` can treat any provider uniformly.
- `Provider#authorization_flow` (`:authorization_code`) and
`ClientCredentialsProvider#authorization_flow` (`:client_credentials`).
`Flow#run!` dispatches on this rather than inspecting
`client_metadata[:grant_types]`, which is protocol metadata for
the authorization server, not an SDK control signal.
- `run_client_credentials!` shares the same PRM / AS metadata discovery
and Communication Security checks as the interactive flow, then
exchanges `grant_type=client_credentials` at the token endpoint via
the existing `post_to_token_endpoint` (which already applies
`client_secret_basic`). There is no PKCE, redirect, or `offline_access`
augmentation, because the grant does not issue a refresh token
(OAuth 2.1 Section 4.3.3).
- `conformance/client.rb` builds a `ClientCredentialsProvider` for
the `auth/client-credentials-*` scenarios, reusing the harness-injected
`client_id` / `client_secret`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New `ClientCredentialsProvider` tests cover: credentials are stored as
client information; `authorization_flow` is `:client_credentials`;
`client_secret_post` is accepted; missing `client_id` / `client_secret`
and `token_endpoint_auth_method: "none"` are rejected; and the token helpers
delegate to storage.
New `Flow` tests cover: a `client_credentials` provider exchanges
`grant_type=client_credentials` with HTTP Basic auth, saves the token,
and never contacts the authorization or registration endpoint;
the requested scope is taken from PRM `scopes_supported`; and a standard
`Provider` runs the authorization-code grant regardless of what its
`client_metadata[:grant_types]` lists. A `Provider` test asserts
`authorization_flow` is `:authorization_code`.
Conformance: `auth/client-credentials-basic` now passes 7/7 with no failures.
## Breaking Changes
None. `ClientCredentialsProvider` is a new class; the existing `Provider` keeps
its required `redirect_uri` / `redirect_handler` / `callback_handler` arguments
and its behaviour is unchanged. Existing interactive clients are unaffected.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP authorization specification (2025-11-25 scope-selection-strategy)
and RFC 6750 Section 3.1 describe OAuth 2.0 step-up authentication:
the client already holds a valid access token, but the server returns a 403
with `WWW-Authenticate: Bearer error="insufficient_scope", scope="..."`
to demand a higher-privileged scope for a specific operation.
The client is expected to run a fresh authorization request with
the escalated scope and retry.
Until now the Ruby SDK only ran the OAuth flow on 401 responses.
A 403 surfaced unchanged as a `RequestHandlerError` and the operation
that needed the escalated scope failed permanently, even with a valid token
in storage. This lined up with the `auth/scope-step-up` conformance
scenario being listed in `conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
The change adds:
- `MCP::Client::HTTP#send_request` recognises a 403 carrying
an `insufficient_scope` Bearer challenge as a step-up signal,
re-runs a full authorization request with the scope from the challenge,
and retries the original request. Retries are capped at
one per `send_request` call so a server that repeatedly demands more
scope cannot loop the transport.
- `run_step_up_flow!` deliberately bypasses the refresh-token path that
`run_oauth_flow!` uses on 401. Refreshing would re-issue the same
scope set the existing token already has and the server already
rejected. Only a fresh `authorization_code` grant with the escalated
scope can succeed.
- A plain 403 with no `insufficient_scope` challenge continues to
surface as `RequestHandlerError` with `error_type: :forbidden`.
- `conformance/client.rb` invokes a tool for the `auth/scope-step-up`
scenario; the scenario's authorization middleware only requires
the escalated scope on `tools/call`, so the previous `tools/list`-only
client could never trigger the second authorization.
- `auth/scope-step-up` is removed from `conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
Resolves#383.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New `HTTPOAuthTest` cases cover: the 403 insufficient_scope path
re-authorizes with the escalated scope from the challenge and retries
the original request with the new bearer token; a plain 403 without
the `insufficient_scope` challenge is surfaced as
`error_type: :forbidden` with no OAuth side effects; repeated
`insufficient_scope` responses retry at most once and then surface the 403;
a provider with a saved `refresh_token` still goes through
the full authorization request rather than exchanging the refresh token,
because the existing scope set is precisely what was rejected.
Conformance: `auth/scope-step-up` now passes 22/22 with no warnings.
`bundle exec rake test`, `bundle exec rake rubocop`, and
`bundle exec rake conformance` are all green.
## Breaking Changes
None. Behaviour on 401 is unchanged. A 403 without the `insufficient_scope`
Bearer challenge still raises the same `RequestHandlerError` as before.
The new retry only fires when both the WWW-Authenticate header signals step-up
and the transport was constructed with an OAuth provider.
## Motivation and Context
SEP-2207 describes how an OAuth client obtains refresh tokens: it
declares the `refresh_token` grant type in its client metadata and
requests the `offline_access` scope, but only when the authorization
server advertises `offline_access` in its metadata `scopes_supported`.
Requesting `offline_access` when the server does not list it is forbidden.
The Ruby SDK already supports the refresh grant (`Flow#refresh!`) but never
requested `offline_access`, so it could not obtain a refresh token from a server
that gates it behind that scope. This aligns the SDK with the Python and TypeScript SDKs
and makes the `auth/offline-access-scope` conformance scenario pass
(previously it reported one warning, `sep-2207-client-metadata-grant-types`,
and was listed in the expected-failures baseline).
The change adds:
- `Flow#augment_scope_with_offline_access`, called from `run!` after
`resolve_scope`, appends `offline_access` to the requested scope when
both the client opted into refresh tokens (its registered
`grant_types` include `refresh_token`) and the authorization server
advertises `offline_access` in its metadata `scopes_supported`.
Already-present `offline_access` is not duplicated. Gating on the server
advertisement keeps the SDK from ever requesting the scope where it is not supported.
- `conformance/client.rb` declares `refresh_token` in `grant_types`, an honest reflection
of the SDK's refresh support, which clears the SEP-2207 grant-types warning.
- `auth/offline-access-scope` is removed from `conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New `Flow` tests cover: `offline_access` is requested when the server advertises it
and the client declared the `refresh_token` grant; `offline_access` is NOT requested
when the client did not declare the grant; `offline_access` is NOT requested
when the server does not advertise it (even with the grant declared);
and `offline_access` is not duplicated when it is already part of the resolved scope.
Conformance: `auth/offline-access-scope` now passes 14/14 with no warnings,
and `auth/offline-access-not-supported` still passes 13/13 (no regression).
`bundle exec rake test`, `bundle exec rake rubocop`, and `bundle exec rake conformance`
are all green.
## Breaking Changes
None. `offline_access` is appended only when the client's own `grant_types` opt
into refresh tokens and the authorization server advertises the scope, so existing clients
that do neither see no change in the scope they request.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP 2025-11-25 authorization specification and `draft-ietf-oauth-client-id-metadata-document-00` define
Client ID Metadata Documents (CIMD): a client publishes its OAuth metadata at an HTTPS URL and uses that URL
as the OAuth `client_id` instead of going through Dynamic Client Registration. The Python and TypeScript SDKs
already implement this; the Ruby SDK now reaches parity.
The change adds:
- `MCP::Client::OAuth::Provider` accepts an optional `client_id_metadata_document_url:` keyword.
- A new `Discovery.client_id_metadata_document_url?` validator enforces structural requirements.
Spec-required: `https` scheme, a non-root path, and no fragment, userinfo, or `.`/`..` segments
(including the percent-encoded form `%2E`). Stricter than the draft as an SDK policy: query strings
are also rejected, because different encodings of the same query would yield distinct `client_id` strings for
the same logical document. The loopback `http` carve-out used for discovery URLs does not extend to CIMD URLs,
since the value is sent verbatim to the authorization server as the OAuth `client_id` and travels off-loopback.
Validation failures raise `Provider::InvalidClientIDMetadataDocumentURLError`.
- `Flow#ensure_client_registered` routes through CIMD only when the authorization server advertises
`client_id_metadata_document_supported` as JSON `boolean true`; truthy non-boolean values
(string `"true"`, `"false"`, etc.) fall back to DCR, matching the gating in the Python and TypeScript SDKs.
- The CIMD `client_id` is NOT persisted to storage. AS support is re-read on every flow so a server
that later drops CIMD support stops receiving the stale URL. Pre-registered `client_information`
continues to win over CIMD when both are available.
- `Flow#refresh!` reconstructs the CIMD `client_id` from live AS metadata when refreshing tokens obtained via CIMD.
When support has been withdrawn and no other identity is stored, it raises a clear `AuthorizationError` rather than
sending a `client_id` the authorization server no longer recognises.
- The Provider docstring and README OAuth section explain that DCR `client_metadata` and the JSON document served at
the CIMD URL are separate artifacts: DCR metadata MUST NOT include `client_id`, while the CIMD document MUST include
`client_id` set to the URL, `client_name`, and `redirect_uris` covering `redirect_uri`.
- `auth/basic-cimd` is removed from `conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`Discovery` tests cover: https with path accepted; non-https rejected (http, ftp, file); root and empty path rejected;
fragment, query, and userinfo rejected; dot segments rejected including the percent-encoded form `%2E`; nil, empty,
and malformed inputs rejected.
`Provider` tests cover: the default `nil`; rejection of http URLs (loopback included); non-https schemes;
root and empty path; fragment; query; userinfo; and dot segments.
`Flow#run!` tests cover: skip DCR when the authorization server advertises CIMD and the provider has a URL;
fall back to DCR when the authorization server does not advertise support; fall back to DCR when the value is
the string `"false"` or `"true"`; pre-registered `client_information` wins over CIMD; the CIMD `client_id` is not
persisted to storage; a second flow against an authorization server that has dropped CIMD support recovers via DCR.
`Flow#refresh!` tests cover: refresh reconstructs the CIMD `client_id` without a stored `client_information`;
refresh raises when the authorization server no longer advertises CIMD support; stored `client_information`
takes precedence over the CIMD URL during refresh.
Conformance: `auth/basic-cimd` now passes 12/12 with no warnings. `bundle exec rake test`, `bundle exec rake rubocop`,
and `bundle exec rake conformance` are all green.
## Breaking Changes
None. The `client_id_metadata_document_url:` keyword is purely opt-in and defaults to `nil`.
When the keyword is omitted, the DCR flow is unchanged. Existing OAuth users see no behaviour change.
The CIMD path is only entered when both the user explicitly configures a URL and the authorization server
advertises support via `client_id_metadata_document_supported: true`.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP Authorization spec (2025-11-25) requires clients to support
Protected Resource Metadata discovery (RFC 9728), Authorization
Server Metadata discovery (RFC 8414), Dynamic Client Registration,
and OAuth 2.1 Authorization Code grant with PKCE (S256). The Ruby SDK
previously had no client-side OAuth support: the HTTP transport raised
`RequestHandlerError` on a 401 with no recovery, and 21 `auth/*` scenarios
were listed as known failures in `conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
This aligns the Ruby SDK with the Python and TypeScript SDKs,
both of which expose a pluggable OAuth client provider that drives
the full discovery + DCR + authorization + token exchange flow.
`MCP::Client::OAuth::Provider` mirrors that surface: callers supply
`client_metadata`, a `redirect_uri`, and pluggable `redirect_handler`
/ `callback_handler` hooks plus a token/client information storage.
`MCP::Client::OAuth::InMemoryStorage` is provided as a default.
`MCP::Client::HTTP` accepts a new optional `oauth:` keyword. When present,
the transport attaches `Authorization: Bearer` to every request,
and on a 401 parses `WWW-Authenticate` for the `resource_metadata` URL
and `scope` challenge, drives the discovery + DCR + authorization code flow
through the provider, and retries the failed request once with the acquired token.
Spec compliance details:
- The `WWW-Authenticate` parser handles multiple challenges
(e.g. `Basic ..., Bearer ...` or `Bearer ..., DPoP ...`), extracting only
the parameters that belong to the Bearer challenge.
- The PRM `resource` value is required to cover the MCP server URL
(same scheme/host/port, with the PRM path as a prefix of the server path)
before the flow continues, preventing redirection of issued tokens to a different audience.
- Both authorization and token requests always include a `resource`
parameter (RFC 8707), defaulting to a canonicalized form of
the MCP server URL when PRM does not advertise one.
- `client_secret_basic`, `client_secret_post`, and `none` token endpoint
authentication methods are supported. When pre-registered client information
specifies no `token_endpoint_auth_method`, the transport defaults to
`client_secret_basic` per RFC 6749 §2.3.1 an dthe TS/Python SDK convention.
Pre-registered client credentials supplied via `Storage#save_client_information`
with either string or symbol keys are honored, skipping DCR.
- Scope resolution follows the spec order: the `WWW-Authenticate` challenge scope wins first,
then PRM `scopes_supported`, and `Provider#scope` is the last-resort fallback only
if neither is supplied (the provider-supplied scope must not pre-empt server-advertised scope).
- Token endpoint error responses (RFC 6749 §5.2) are parsed: a 4x with
`error: "invalid_grant"` raises `Flow::InvalidGrantError`,
so `MCP::Client::HTTP` can discard the stored refresh token only when
the AS truly says it is dead. Generic `AuthorizationError`
(5xx, network failures, other error codes) leaves the refresh token
intact, so a transient AS outage does not force interactive reauth
on the next attempt.
- The OAuth `state` parameter is compared via
`OpenSSL.fixed_length_secure_compare` (with a `bytesize` guard) to
prevent timing-based discovery of the expected value.
- The 401 retry guard is a request-scoped local variable, so an MCP server
that keeps returning 401 is surfaced as an error after one
retry rather than triggering an infinite re-authorization loop.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Unit tests cover PKCE generation, multi-challenge `WWW-Authenticate` parsing,
PRM and Authorization Server metadata URL builders, the full Flow orchestrator
(success path, state mismatch, missing PKCE support, skipping DCR for both string
and symbol-keyed preregistered client information, `client_secret_basic`
token endpoint authentication, PRM `resource` mismatch rejection, fallback to
the server URL when PRM omits `resource`, scope resolution preferring PRM
`scopes_supported` over `Provider#scope`, default `client_secret_basic` for
confidential clients without an explicit `token_endpoint_auth_method`,
and the new `InvalidGrantError` vs generic `AuthorizationError` split for
token endpoint rejections), and the HTTP transport behavior
(401 recovery + retry, no-provider fallthrough, no infinite loop on repeated 401,
no infinite loop on flow failure, refresh-token retention on transient 5xx from
the token endpoint).
Conformance: `bundle exec rake conformance` newly passes 16 `auth/*`
scenarios beyond the existing baseline, including
`auth/metadata-default`, `metadata-var{1,2,3}`,
`scope-from-www-authenticate`, `scope-from-scopes-supported`,
`scope-omitted-when-undefined`, `scope-retry-limit`,
`token-endpoint-auth-{basic,post,none}`, `pre-registration`,
`resource-mismatch`, and `offline-access-not-supported`. Remaining
`auth/*` scenarios stay in `expected_failures.yml`.
`bundle exec rake test rubocop` is clean.
## Breaking Changes
None. `MCP::Client::HTTP#initialize` accepts a new optional `oauth:`
keyword that defaults to `nil`, preserving existing behavior. When unset,
the transport raises `MCP::Client::RequestHandlerError` on a 401 exactly as before.
## Motivation and Context
PR #248 introduced server conformance testing using `@modelcontextprotocol/conformance`.
This extends coverage to the client side so that `MCP::Client` behavior can also be validated against
the MCP specification.
### Scope
Client conformance is driven by the conformance runner, which spawns test servers for each scenario
and invokes `conformance/client.rb` against them. The client script delegates the MCP initialize
handshake to `MCP::Client#connect` and executes scenario-specific operations (for example listing
tools or calling a tool).
### Usage
Run all conformance tests (server + client):
```console
bundle exec rake conformance
```
Run a single client scenario:
```console
bundle exec rake conformance SCENARIO=initialize
```
List available scenarios:
```console
bundle exec rake conformance_list
```
## How Has This Been Tested?
Ran `bundle exec rake conformance` locally.
- Server conformance: 40 passed, 0 failed.
- Client conformance: 3 passed, 54 failed (all 54 listed in `expected_failures.yml`).
## Breaking Change
No. This change only adds test infrastructure under `conformance/` and does not modify SDK behavior.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP specification (2025-11-25) defines elicitation as a server-to-client
request mechanism that allows servers to request user input during tool execution:
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-11-25/client/elicitation
This aligns with the Python SDK, which also exposes separate methods for form and URL mode elicitation.
Three methods are added following the Python SDK's API design:
- `create_form_elicitation`: collects structured data via JSON Schema
- `create_url_elicitation`: directs users to external URLs for sensitive
interactions (OAuth, credentials, etc.)
- `notify_elicitation_complete`: notifies the client that a URL mode
interaction has completed
`URLElicitationRequiredError` (error code `-32042`) is defined as a subclass of `RequestHandlerError`
with its own `error_code` and `error_data` attributes. `JsonRpcHandler#handle_request_error` is
extended to check for these attributes so that MCP-specific error codes can be propagated without
embedding MCP knowledge in the generic JSON-RPC layer.
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Unit tests for `ServerSession` form/URL mode, capability checks, nil
capabilities, notification, and `URLElicitationRequiredError`
- `ServerContext` delegation tests for all three elicitation methods
- `JsonRpcHandler` tests for custom error code and fallback behavior
- `Methods` capability test for `NOTIFICATIONS_ELICITATION_COMPLETE`
- Conformance tests pass (40/40), including `tools-call-elicitation`,
`elicitation-sep1034-defaults`, and `elicitation-sep1330-enums`
- All tests pass (`rake test`), RuboCop is clean
- Verified form mode elicitation end-to-end with a sample MCP server
running in Claude Code
## Breaking Changes
None. This is a new feature addition.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP specification defines `sampling/createMessage` to request LLM completions from the client.
The Ruby SDK did not yet support server-to-client requests,
so the server had no way to ask the client to sample an LLM.
This caused the `tools-call-sampling` conformance test to fail.
This adds `Server#create_sampling_message` to send a `sampling/createMessage` request
to the client via the transport layer. The method validates that the client declared
the `sampling` capability during initialization, and optionally checks the
`sampling.tools` capability when tools or tool_choice parameters are provided.
On the transport side, `Transport#send_request` is introduced as an abstract method,
with implementations in both `StdioTransport` and `StreamableHTTPTransport`.
Each transport assigns a unique request ID, sends the JSON-RPC request to the client,
and blocks until the client responds.
Client capabilities are stored per session via `ServerSession`, so validation is scoped
to the originating client. `ServerSession#create_sampling_message` uses
`build_sampling_params` for capability validation and sends the request directly through
the transport with the session ID, following the same pattern as `notify_progress`.
`Server#create_sampling_message` is the public API for single-client transports
(e.g., StdioTransport).
For multi-client transports (e.g., StreamableHTTPTransport),
`ServerSession#create_sampling_message` must be used to route requests to the correct client.
Tools using `server_context.create_sampling_message` automatically route to the correct session
regardless of transport.
`StreamableHTTPTransport#send_request` requires `session_id` to prevent broadcasting sampling requests
to all connected clients. Missing or invalid session IDs raise explicit errors instead of silently failing.
The `include_context` parameter is soft-deprecated in the MCP specification but is included
for compatibility with existing clients that declare the `sampling.context` capability.
Python and TypeScript SDKs also retain this parameter.
Ref: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/latest/server/utilities/sampling
## How Has This Been Tested?
Added comprehensive tests in `test/mcp/server_sampling_test.rb` covering required and optional parameters,
capability validation, error handling, nil-param omission, per-session capability isolation,
and HTTP init capability scoping.
Added transport tests in `test/mcp/server/transports/stdio_transport_test.rb` and
`test/mcp/server/transports/streamable_http_transport_test.rb` for `send_request` round-trip behavior,
error responses, stateless mode rejection, missing session_id, invalid session_id, and no-active-stream error.
Conformance: `tools-call-sampling` is removed from expected failures. The conformance server's `TestSampling`
tool now calls `server_context.create_sampling_message` instead of returning a stub error.
This aligns the Ruby SDK with the MCP specification and other SDK implementations.
## Breaking Changes
None for end users.
`Transport#send_request` is a new abstract method. `ServerSession#create_sampling_message` is a new method.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP specification defines `notifications/progress` for reporting incremental progress
during long-running tool operations. The Ruby SDK did not yet support this, so tools had no way to
send progress updates to clients. This caused the `tools-call-with-progress` conformance test to fail.
This adds an `MCP::ServerContext` wrapper that provides a `report_progress` method on
`server_context`. Tools call `server_context.report_progress(value, total:, message:)` to send
notifications back to the client. The method is a no-op when no `progressToken` was provided,
so tools can call it unconditionally without checking for a token.
This design is consistent with the TypeScript and Python SDKs, which provide progress
reporting through a context object rather than a separate parameter.
On the client side, `Client#call_tool` now accepts a `progress_token:` parameter that sets
`_meta.progressToken` in the request.
Ref: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/latest/server/utilities/progress
## How Has This Been Tested?
Added comprehensive tests in `test/mcp/server_progress_test.rb` covering `notify_progress`,
tool integration with progress, block-defined tools, `**kwargs` tools, and no-op behavior
without a token.
Added client tests for `progress_token:` parameter inclusion and omission.
Added `test/mcp/server_context_test.rb` test for non-Hash `server_context` preservation
when `_meta` is present.
Conformance: `tools-call-with-progress` removed from expected failures.
## Breaking Change
`server_context` is now always an `MCP::ServerContext` instance when passed to tools,
even if the server has no context configured. Code that checks `server_context ?` to
detect a nil context will need to be updated, as `ServerContext` is always truthy.
`ServerContext` delegates method calls to the underlying context object via
`method_missing`, so `server_context[:key]` and other accessor patterns continue to work.
In practice, this is unlikely to affect users. A tool that declares `server_context:`
is opting in to use the context; if the server has no context configured, that is a
server configuration issue rather than something the tool should handle with a nil check.
## Motivation
To assess and track the Ruby SDK's compliance with the MCP
specification, integrate `@modelcontextprotocol/conformance` as the
standard evaluation harness. This makes it possible to measure
conformance objectively, catch regressions early, and produce the kind
of evaluation data needed for SDK tier assessments.
## Scope
Only server conformance is included at this point. Client conformance
requires protocol-level features that MCP::Client does not yet
support (initialize handshake, notifications, ping, etc.).
## Usage
Run conformance tests:
```console
bundle exec rake conformance
```
Start the conformance server in the foreground for iterating on a single
scenario without the per-run startup overhead:
```console
bundle exec rake conformance_server
```
## Default Rake Task (`bundle exec rake`)
It is configured to run in order of lower execution cost: `rubocop`, `test`, and then `conformance`.
## CI
`.github/workflows/conformance.yml` file has been added to run the conformance tests in CI.
## SDK Tier Report
The MCP SDK Tier system (https://modelcontextprotocol.io/community/sdk-tiers)
requires SDK maintainers to self-assess and report results to the SDK Working
Group via https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/issues.
To generate a full tier assessment report, use the `/mcp-sdk-tier-audit`
slash command from the https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/conformance repository with
the conformance server running:
```console
# Terminal 1 (this repository): start the conformance server
bundle exec rake conformance_server
# Terminal 2 (conformance repository): run the tier audit skill as a slash command in Claude Code
/mcp-sdk-tier-audit /path/to/modelcontextprotocol/ruby-sdk http://localhost:9292/mcp
```
The skill evaluates conformance pass rate, issue label taxonomy, triage
metrics, documentation coverage, and policy compliance, then produces a
markdown report suitable for tier advancement submissions.
Koichi ITO