## Motivation and Context
An MCP server chooses the authorization server its users sign in to. It names one in `authorization_servers`
in its Protected Resource Metadata, and states the scopes it wants in `scopes_supported`
or in the `WWW-Authenticate` challenge. Nothing binds either choice to the server's own identity.
No origin rule can settle this, because an authorization server is legitimately a different origin
from the resource it protects. Validating that a token was issued for the intended audience is a responsibility
the specification places on MCP servers rather than on clients, and there is no portable way for a client
to perform it either: access tokens are frequently opaque, and an authorization server is not required to honor
the `resource` parameter or to report an audience in the token response.
Two things follow from that, and they are separate.
The first is a judgement, and it belongs to whoever embeds this SDK, because an application often knows
which providers its users deal with. `authorization_request_validator` is handed an `AuthorizationRequest` describing
the authorization server, the scopes, the MCP server, and the RFC 8707 resource, and can refuse.
It is one object rather than keyword arguments so that later revisions of the specification can add to it
without changing the shape implementers wrote. It runs on all three grants, and on the authorization-code grant it
runs before dynamic client registration, which is why scope resolution moved above `ensure_client_registered`:
a refusal must not leave this client registered at an authorization server the host just rejected.
The second is not a judgement and is enforced here rather than asked about. `refresh!` rediscovers
the authorization server on every call, so the server named for a session can differ from the one
the stored tokens came from. SEP-2352 already binds client credentials to their issuer,
but that check passes when the issuer was never recorded and is deliberately skipped for a Client ID Metadata Document URL,
which is portable across authorization servers. The issuer that minted the tokens is now recorded with them,
and `refresh!` refuses to present them to a different one. The transport answers that refusal by running
a full authorization, which brings the new authorization server to the validator above. Tokens stored before
this carry no issuer and keep refreshing.
The hook decides whether to proceed, not what to ask for. The scopes reach the authorization server unchanged either way,
because the specification requires a client to treat the scopes in the challenge as authoritative for the operation,
and narrowing them silently would break that.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New tests in `test/mcp/client/oauth/flow_test.rb` assert what the validator receives, that a refusal raises
before any registration request is sent and before the redirect handler runs, and that the `client_credentials`
and `jwt-bearer` grants consult it too. Others cover the issuer recorded on authorization, the refusal to refresh against
a different one, and that tokens stored without an issuer still refresh. A test in `test/mcp/client/oauth/http_oauth_test.rb`
drives the two halves together: a stale issuer makes the refresh fail, the transport reauthorizes, and the validator sees
the newly named authorization server while no refresh token is ever posted to it. Each of them fails with its half of
this change removed. `bundle exec rake` (tests, RuboCop, and conformance baseline) passes.
## Breaking Changes
Refreshing now fails when the authorization server named for a session differs from the one that issued the stored tokens,
and the caller reauthorizes instead. Tokens stored before this change carry no recorded issuer and are unaffected
until their next authorization. The validator itself is additive: it defaults to `nil`, and a provider that does not offer
it authorizes as before.
## Motivation and Context
`MCP::Client::HTTP` caps a single message from the server at 4 MiB, but the OAuth flow talks to
authorization endpoints over its own Faraday connection, and that one had no cap. Discovery,
dynamic client registration, and token responses were buffered in full and handed to `JSON.parse`,
so a server that answered an OAuth request with an endless body grew the client's memory for as
long as it kept sending.
`Flow` and `IDJAGTokenExchange` each build their own connection, so both needed the bound.
The new `BoundedBody` counts bytes in a Faraday `on_data` callback and refuses the response once
it passes `MAX_RESPONSE_BYTES`, which matches the 4 MiB of `MCP::Client::HTTP::MAX_MESSAGE_BYTES`
and `MCP::Client::Stdio::MAX_LINE_BYTES`. It hands back the status paired with the bounded body
rather than the Faraday response, so no later caller can reach the unbounded `response.body`.
Those bytes are counted after decompression. The default Net::HTTP adapter negotiates `Accept-Encoding`
itself and reads the body through `Net::HTTPResponse#inflater`, so a small compressed body that expands past
the cap is refused partway through the expansion. That holds only while the connection leaves
`Accept-Encoding` alone, which is now recorded in a comment on both `default_http_client` definitions.
An over-cap response is refused rather than truncated: a partial discovery or token document cannot be validated.
Protected resource metadata is the one place where refusing is not fatal, since any PRM discovery failure
already selects the legacy authorization path by design.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New unit tests in `test/mcp/client/oauth/bounded_body_test.rb` cover the streaming path,
the at-limit boundary, and the fallback for adapters that ignore `on_data`. One of them serves
a gzip body over a real socket rather than through WebMock, which returns a stubbed body verbatim
and never runs the inflater; it fails if the cap ever starts measuring compressed bytes. New tests in
`test/mcp/client/oauth/flow_test.rb` and `test/mcp/client/oauth/id_jag_token_exchange_test.rb` drive each of
the four request wrappers end to end with an over-cap body; all five fail without the cap in place.
## Breaking Changes
An OAuth endpoint response larger than 4 MiB is now rejected instead of parsed.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP Enterprise Managed Authorization extension (SEP-990, modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol#990,
accepted/final, published in the ext-auth repository) lets enterprise identity providers govern MCP authorization:
the client exchanges an IdP-issued ID token for an Identity Assertion Authorization Grant (ID-JAG) via
RFC 8693 token exchange at the IdP, then presents the ID-JAG to the MCP authorization server with
the RFC 7523 `jwt-bearer` grant, authenticating with `client_secret_basic`.
The `auth/cross-app-access-complete-flow` conformance scenario exercises the complete flow and previously failed
its two core checks (the Ruby client ran the authorization-code flow instead).
This mirrors the merged TypeScript SDK implementation (`requestJwtAuthorizationGrant` / `CrossAppAccessProvider` in
typescript-sdk; the Python SDK tracks the same work in the open python-sdk#1721), adapted to this SDK's provider design:
- New `MCP::Client::OAuth::IDJAGTokenExchange.request` performs the RFC 8693 exchange at the IdP token endpoint
(`subject_token_type` id_token, `requested_token_type` id-jag, `audience` = the MCP authorization server's issuer,
`resource` = the canonical MCP server URL) and validates that the response's `issued_token_type` is an ID-JAG
before returning the assertion. The ID-JAG itself is treated as opaque, as in the TypeScript SDK.
- New `MCP::Client::OAuth::CrossAppAccessProvider` declares `authorization_flow :jwt_bearer` and takes the assertion
from a callable (`call(audience:, resource:)`), so the common `IDJAGTokenExchange` case, enterprise secret stores,
and tests all plug in the same way (the TypeScript provider's assertion callback works identically).
The MCP AS credentials are stored as `client_secret_basic` client information.
- `Flow` dispatches `:jwt_bearer` alongside `:client_credentials`: discovery, issuer validation, and endpoint security checks
are shared with `run!`, then `run_jwt_bearer!` requests the assertion with the validated issuer as the audience and posts
the `jwt-bearer` grant through the existing `post_to_token_endpoint`.
- The conformance client builds a `CrossAppAccessProvider` when the harness injects `idp_id_token` (exchanging it at
`idp_token_endpoint` with `idp_client_id`, like the TypeScript and Python conformance clients),
and `auth/cross-app-access-complete-flow` is removed from `conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
- New `test/mcp/client/oauth/id_jag_token_exchange_test.rb` asserts the exact RFC 8693 form parameters on the wire
and the response validation: a non-ID-JAG `issued_token_type` is rejected, as are a missing `access_token`,
non-2xx responses, unparseable bodies, and non-object JSON.
- New `test/mcp/client/oauth/cross_app_access_provider_test.rb` covers the provider surface:
stored `client_secret_basic` credentials, the `:jwt_bearer` flow declaration, audience/resource passthrough to
the assertion callable, constructor validation (missing client_id, missing client_secret, non-callable assertion provider),
and storage delegation.
- New tests in `test/mcp/client/oauth/flow_test.rb` run the full grant against WebMock stubs: the token request carries
`grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer`, the assertion, the RFC 8707 `resource`, and HTTP Basic credentials,
with no DCR and no authorization-code machinery; the assertion callable receives the validated issuer as `audience`
and the canonical server URL as `resource`; an empty assertion aborts before the token endpoint is contacted.
## Breaking Changes
None. `IDJAGTokenExchange` and `CrossAppAccessProvider` are new, and the `Flow` dispatch only activates for providers
that declare `authorization_flow :jwt_bearer`.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP `io.modelcontextprotocol/oauth-client-credentials` extension
(SEP-1046, modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol#1046) specifies
two client authentication methods for the `client_credentials` grant:
`client_secret_basic` and the RECOMMENDED `private_key_jwt`
(RFC 7523 Section 2.2 JWT client assertion). The previous commit added
the grant with secret-based authentication; this adds the JWT method,
which is what the `auth/client-credentials-jwt` conformance scenario exercises.
This mirrors the merged implementations in the TypeScript SDK
(`PrivateKeyJwtProvider`, typescript-sdk#1157) and the Python SDK
(`PrivateKeyJWTOAuthProvider` / `SignedJWTParameters`, python-sdk#1663),
adapted to this SDK's provider design:
- New `MCP::Client::OAuth::JWTClientAssertion` builds the RFC 7523 compact
JWS with openssl, keeping the SDK free of a JWT gem dependency
(the TypeScript and Python SDKs use jose and PyJWT). Claims follow SEP-1046:
`iss` and `sub` carry the client_id, `aud` carries the authorization
server's issuer identifier, plus `exp` (300-second lifetime, matching both SDKs),
`iat`, and a unique `jti`. ES256 and RS256 are supported; ES256 signatures are
converted from OpenSSL's ASN.1 DER form to the raw 64-byte `r || s` encoding
JWS requires (RFC 7518 Section 3.4).
- `ClientCredentialsProvider` accepts
`token_endpoint_auth_method: "private_key_jwt"` with `private_key:`
(PEM string or `OpenSSL::PKey::PKey`) and a required `signing_algorithm:`
(no default, so an algorithm mismatch with the server's
`token_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported` fails loudly at construction;
both reference SDKs also take the algorithm explicitly).
The key stays on the provider and is never written to `storage`;
a throwaway assertion is signed at construction to fail fast on an unparseable key
or a key/algorithm mismatch.
- `Flow#post_to_token_endpoint` sends `client_assertion_type` and a freshly
signed `client_assertion` for `private_key_jwt`,
using the `ensure_issuer_matches!`-validated issuer as the audience,
and omits `client_id` from the body per SEP-1046
(identity travels in the assertion's claims).
- The conformance client builds a `private_key_jwt` provider
when the harness injects `private_key_pem`, defaulting the algorithm to
ES256 like the TypeScript and Python conformance clients,
and `auth/client-credentials-jwt` is removed from
`conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
Scope notes: only ES256 and RS256 are supported for now (the TypeScript and
Python SDKs accept whatever their JWT libraries support);
adding further algorithms is additive. There is also no injection point yet for
externally signed assertions (the TypeScript SDK's `StaticPrivateKeyJwtProvider` and
the Python SDK's `assertion_provider` callback cover KMS/HSM-held keys);
that is a separate follow-up.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New `test/mcp/client/oauth/jwt_client_assertion_test.rb` covers the JWS construction:
header and RFC 7523 claims, unpadded base64url segments,
ES256 signature round-trip verification (raw -> DER -> `OpenSSL::PKey::EC#verify`),
RS256 verification, PEM and parsed-key input, lifetime override, unique `jti` per assertion,
and rejection of unsupported algorithms, key/algorithm mismatches
(including a P-384 key with ES256), unparseable PEM, and public-only keys.
New tests in `test/mcp/client/oauth/client_credentials_provider_test.rb` cover
the provider surface: `private_key_jwt` construction, the key and
secret never reaching `client_information`, required `private_key` / `signing_algorithm`,
rejection of a simultaneous `client_secret`, fail-fast on key/algorithm mismatch,
and `client_assertion(audience:)` producing a JWT with the expected claims.
A new test in `test/mcp/client/oauth/flow_test.rb` runs the full grant against WebMock stubs
and asserts the token request carries `grant_type=client_credentials`,
the RFC 7523 `client_assertion_type`, an assertion whose `iss`/`sub` are the client_id
and whose `aud` is the issuer, the RFC 8707 `resource`, and neither `client_id` nor
any secret in the body or headers.
`bundle exec rake` passes; the `auth/client-credentials-jwt` conformance scenario
passes 7/7 checks and the baseline check passes with its expected-failure entry removed.
## Breaking Changes
None. `client_secret:` becomes optional on `ClientCredentialsProvider` only
in the signature; it is still required for the secret-based methods, and all
existing construction paths behave unchanged.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP authorization specification and SEP-1046 allow confidential clients to
obtain tokens through the OAuth 2.1 `client_credentials` grant: a machine-to-machine flow
with no user, no browser redirect, and no authorization code. The Ruby SDK
previously supported only the interactive authorization-code flow, so it could not
authenticate against a server that requires `client_credentials`. This makes
the `auth/client-credentials-basic` conformance scenario pass and is removed from
the expected failures list.
Following the TypeScript SDK (`ClientCredentialsProvider`) and the Python SDK
(`ClientCredentialsOAuthProvider`), the grant gets its own provider class rather than
overloading the authorization-code provider. The change adds:
- `MCP::Client::OAuth::ClientCredentialsProvider`, a dedicated provider
for the grant. `client_id` and `client_secret` are mandatory
(the grant is for confidential clients), `token_endpoint_auth_method` is
`client_secret_basic` (default) or `client_secret_post` -- `none` is
rejected because an unauthenticated `client_credentials` request is
meaningless. It has no redirect arguments, so a credentials-only
client never supplies the redirect URI / handlers that grant has no use for.
- `MCP::Client::OAuth::StorageBackedProvider`, an internal module that
shares the token / client-information persistence between the two provider classes
so `Flow` can treat any provider uniformly.
- `Provider#authorization_flow` (`:authorization_code`) and
`ClientCredentialsProvider#authorization_flow` (`:client_credentials`).
`Flow#run!` dispatches on this rather than inspecting
`client_metadata[:grant_types]`, which is protocol metadata for
the authorization server, not an SDK control signal.
- `run_client_credentials!` shares the same PRM / AS metadata discovery
and Communication Security checks as the interactive flow, then
exchanges `grant_type=client_credentials` at the token endpoint via
the existing `post_to_token_endpoint` (which already applies
`client_secret_basic`). There is no PKCE, redirect, or `offline_access`
augmentation, because the grant does not issue a refresh token
(OAuth 2.1 Section 4.3.3).
- `conformance/client.rb` builds a `ClientCredentialsProvider` for
the `auth/client-credentials-*` scenarios, reusing the harness-injected
`client_id` / `client_secret`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
New `ClientCredentialsProvider` tests cover: credentials are stored as
client information; `authorization_flow` is `:client_credentials`;
`client_secret_post` is accepted; missing `client_id` / `client_secret`
and `token_endpoint_auth_method: "none"` are rejected; and the token helpers
delegate to storage.
New `Flow` tests cover: a `client_credentials` provider exchanges
`grant_type=client_credentials` with HTTP Basic auth, saves the token,
and never contacts the authorization or registration endpoint;
the requested scope is taken from PRM `scopes_supported`; and a standard
`Provider` runs the authorization-code grant regardless of what its
`client_metadata[:grant_types]` lists. A `Provider` test asserts
`authorization_flow` is `:authorization_code`.
Conformance: `auth/client-credentials-basic` now passes 7/7 with no failures.
## Breaking Changes
None. `ClientCredentialsProvider` is a new class; the existing `Provider` keeps
its required `redirect_uri` / `redirect_handler` / `callback_handler` arguments
and its behaviour is unchanged. Existing interactive clients are unaffected.
## Motivation and Context
The MCP Authorization spec (2025-11-25) requires clients to support
Protected Resource Metadata discovery (RFC 9728), Authorization
Server Metadata discovery (RFC 8414), Dynamic Client Registration,
and OAuth 2.1 Authorization Code grant with PKCE (S256). The Ruby SDK
previously had no client-side OAuth support: the HTTP transport raised
`RequestHandlerError` on a 401 with no recovery, and 21 `auth/*` scenarios
were listed as known failures in `conformance/expected_failures.yml`.
This aligns the Ruby SDK with the Python and TypeScript SDKs,
both of which expose a pluggable OAuth client provider that drives
the full discovery + DCR + authorization + token exchange flow.
`MCP::Client::OAuth::Provider` mirrors that surface: callers supply
`client_metadata`, a `redirect_uri`, and pluggable `redirect_handler`
/ `callback_handler` hooks plus a token/client information storage.
`MCP::Client::OAuth::InMemoryStorage` is provided as a default.
`MCP::Client::HTTP` accepts a new optional `oauth:` keyword. When present,
the transport attaches `Authorization: Bearer` to every request,
and on a 401 parses `WWW-Authenticate` for the `resource_metadata` URL
and `scope` challenge, drives the discovery + DCR + authorization code flow
through the provider, and retries the failed request once with the acquired token.
Spec compliance details:
- The `WWW-Authenticate` parser handles multiple challenges
(e.g. `Basic ..., Bearer ...` or `Bearer ..., DPoP ...`), extracting only
the parameters that belong to the Bearer challenge.
- The PRM `resource` value is required to cover the MCP server URL
(same scheme/host/port, with the PRM path as a prefix of the server path)
before the flow continues, preventing redirection of issued tokens to a different audience.
- Both authorization and token requests always include a `resource`
parameter (RFC 8707), defaulting to a canonicalized form of
the MCP server URL when PRM does not advertise one.
- `client_secret_basic`, `client_secret_post`, and `none` token endpoint
authentication methods are supported. When pre-registered client information
specifies no `token_endpoint_auth_method`, the transport defaults to
`client_secret_basic` per RFC 6749 §2.3.1 an dthe TS/Python SDK convention.
Pre-registered client credentials supplied via `Storage#save_client_information`
with either string or symbol keys are honored, skipping DCR.
- Scope resolution follows the spec order: the `WWW-Authenticate` challenge scope wins first,
then PRM `scopes_supported`, and `Provider#scope` is the last-resort fallback only
if neither is supplied (the provider-supplied scope must not pre-empt server-advertised scope).
- Token endpoint error responses (RFC 6749 §5.2) are parsed: a 4x with
`error: "invalid_grant"` raises `Flow::InvalidGrantError`,
so `MCP::Client::HTTP` can discard the stored refresh token only when
the AS truly says it is dead. Generic `AuthorizationError`
(5xx, network failures, other error codes) leaves the refresh token
intact, so a transient AS outage does not force interactive reauth
on the next attempt.
- The OAuth `state` parameter is compared via
`OpenSSL.fixed_length_secure_compare` (with a `bytesize` guard) to
prevent timing-based discovery of the expected value.
- The 401 retry guard is a request-scoped local variable, so an MCP server
that keeps returning 401 is surfaced as an error after one
retry rather than triggering an infinite re-authorization loop.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Unit tests cover PKCE generation, multi-challenge `WWW-Authenticate` parsing,
PRM and Authorization Server metadata URL builders, the full Flow orchestrator
(success path, state mismatch, missing PKCE support, skipping DCR for both string
and symbol-keyed preregistered client information, `client_secret_basic`
token endpoint authentication, PRM `resource` mismatch rejection, fallback to
the server URL when PRM omits `resource`, scope resolution preferring PRM
`scopes_supported` over `Provider#scope`, default `client_secret_basic` for
confidential clients without an explicit `token_endpoint_auth_method`,
and the new `InvalidGrantError` vs generic `AuthorizationError` split for
token endpoint rejections), and the HTTP transport behavior
(401 recovery + retry, no-provider fallthrough, no infinite loop on repeated 401,
no infinite loop on flow failure, refresh-token retention on transient 5xx from
the token endpoint).
Conformance: `bundle exec rake conformance` newly passes 16 `auth/*`
scenarios beyond the existing baseline, including
`auth/metadata-default`, `metadata-var{1,2,3}`,
`scope-from-www-authenticate`, `scope-from-scopes-supported`,
`scope-omitted-when-undefined`, `scope-retry-limit`,
`token-endpoint-auth-{basic,post,none}`, `pre-registration`,
`resource-mismatch`, and `offline-access-not-supported`. Remaining
`auth/*` scenarios stay in `expected_failures.yml`.
`bundle exec rake test rubocop` is clean.
## Breaking Changes
None. `MCP::Client::HTTP#initialize` accepts a new optional `oauth:`
keyword that defaults to `nil`, preserving existing behavior. When unset,
the transport raises `MCP::Client::RequestHandlerError` on a 401 exactly as before.
Koichi ITO